Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    Soccer> Community> God Messi>

    Georgia VS Spain

    FIFA World Cup qualification (UEFA)
    Analysis More Tips
    Georgia
    Georgia 0
    4 Spain
    Spain
    Further Reading
    • GoalWin88
      GoalWin88 Won 5/6
      FIFA World Cup qualification (UEFA) Georgia vs Spain Good question. To prepare for a Spain away win against Georgia (i.e., to analyze, predict, or bet on that outcome), here are some key points and a breakdown + strategy outline. (If by prepare you meant something else e.g., for fantasy, betting, or tactical analysis tell me and Ill adjust.) Analysis: Why Spain Are Strong Favorites H2H Dominance In recent head-to-head matches, Spain have beaten Georgia almost every time. According to FootyStats, in the last 7 matches, Spain won 6. Recent Form Spain are in very good shape: according to Forebet, their recent form shows a lot of goals scored and strong control. Georgia, on the other hand, seem to struggle in possession and building play.
      AH
      WCPEU Georgia 0-4 Spain
    • FranCo LeGend
      FranCo LeGend
      FIFA World Cup qualification (UEFA) Georgia vs Spain Georgia Style: Georgia tends to rely on direct play and transitions. Forebet notes they dont always dominate possession but try to punch through via vertical attacks. Speed in attack: They can catch teams off-guard on the break. Individual quality: Players like Khvicha Kvaratskhelia are capable of moments of brilliance. Defensive fragility: According to DailySports, their defense can be exposed, especially against high-quality teams. Possession: They average a relatively low possession and higher error rate in build-up. Depth: Georgia may struggle to sustain pressure over 90 minutes against a technically superior side. Spain Style: Highly possession-oriented, but also very efficient. Forebet describes Spains control + their ability to dominate territory. Ball retention: Spain usually out-possess their opponents and build through midfield. Defensive solidity: Theyve kept multiple clean sheets in qualifying. Creative and set-play quali
      O/U
      WCPEU Georgia 0-4 Spain
    • Loyal08
      Loyal08 Won 3/5
      Georgia VS Spain Georgia's recent record shows that they have achieved 4 wins, 2 draws and 4 losses in the last 10 matches, with a winning rate of 40%. They have shown inconsistent performances in the European qualifiers, including a 3 - 0 home win against Bulgaria and a 1 - 4 away loss to Turkey. Overall, their offensive and defensive statistics are average, with a ball - possession rate of 55% and 12 shots per game. On the other hand, Spain is in excellent form. They have 7 wins and 3 draws in the last 10 matches, with a winning rate of 70%. They have remained unbeaten in the qualifiers, including a 4 - 0 home win against Bulgaria and a 2 - 0 win against Georgia. They have a high ball - possession rate of 78% and 33 shots per game, showing strong offensive firepower. In terms of historical head - to - head records, Georgia has lost all 5 recent matches against Spain, with a winning rate of 0%. Spain holds an absolute advantage and has won many matches by large margins. As for the tea
      O/U
      WCPEU Georgia 0-4 Spain
    More Recommend
    • Portugal and Armenia would likely feature a significant contrast in style and overall quality, as Portugal is one of the stronger teams in European football, while Armenia, though improving, generally operates at a lower level. Let's break down some key aspects: Portugal: Historically, Portugal has played with a flexible system under various managers. They can shift between a 4-3-3 formation or a 4-2-3-1, focusing on ball control and attacking through the wings. The key is often to create space for their creative players to operate in, while Ronaldo (if playing) tends to play as a focal point or central striker. Armenia: Armenia tends to play with a more compact system, typically a 4-2-3-1 or a 4-3-3, trying to absorb pressure and hit on the break. Their focus is often on direct, quick counter-attacks, especially utilizing Mkhitaryans skill in transition. Prediction like Portugal .
      AH
      WCPEU Portugal - Armenia
    • The match between Ukraine and Iceland could be analyzed from a variety of angles, depending on the context you're referring to whether it's a specific game, the overall teams, or a comparison of their football styles. Heres a breakdown based on common key factors like team form, tactical setup, and key players, assuming were discussing a hypothetical international fixture or general comparison between the two sides: Ukraine: Style of Play: Ukraine typically employs an attacking, direct style of play, especially under their recent managers. They focus on fast transitions and play a lot through the wings, utilizing their wingers to stretch opposition defenses. Iceland: Style of Play: Iceland is known for a more pragmatic and organized approach. They typically set up in a compact defensive structure and rely on set-pieces, counter-attacks, and physical play. prediction like Iceland.
      AH
      WCPEU Ukraine - Iceland
    • Italy vs. Norway analysis, assuming youre talking about a football (soccer) match between the two teams. Italy Style of Play: Traditionally, Italy has been known for its defensive tactics, often playing with a 4-3-3 or 4-4-2 formation, focusing on solid defense, midfield control, and quick counter-attacks. In recent years, however, Italy has evolved under coaches like Roberto Mancini to adopt a more attacking and fluid style of play while retaining their defensive resilience. Norway Style of Play: Norway is generally known for a direct and physical style of play, often looking to utilize the long ball to get the ball into attacking positions quickly. Their emphasis is on strength, aerial duels, and counter-attacking football. prediction like over 2.5/3.
      O/U
      WCPEU Italy - Norway
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2025 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.