Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Lucky68>

    PSIM Yogyakarta VS Bali United

    Indonesia Super League
    Analysis More Tips
    PSIM Yogyakarta
    PSIM Yogyakarta 3
    3 Bali United
    Bali United
    Further Reading
    • rebbeca
      rebbeca
      PSIM Yogyakarta VS Bali United Based on the latest data, the last two encounters between Persija Jakarta and Bali United have shown different patterns. In an Indonesian Super League match, Bali United hosted Persija Jakarta. They trailed 1 - 2 in the first half and eventually lost 1 - 3, with a corner - kick difference of -2. In another friendly match, Bali United also played at home against Persija Jakarta, winning 6 - 0 with a corner - kick difference of -7. These data indicate a significant disparity in their home - field performances. Bali United seems more stable in crucial games, while Persija Jakarta's defense appears to have some weaknesses. Moreover, the historical background of their past meetings adds more points of interest to the upcoming game. Although there is no clear clue about the current league rankings of the two teams, it can be seen from the overall performance and confrontation data in recent times that Persija Jakarta may face a tough battle. In particular, how
      AH
      IDN ISL PSIM Yogyakarta 3-3 Bali United
    • Sebastian B
      Sebastian B
      PSIM Yogyakarta VS Bali United In this match, the Yongyakaada team in the Indonesian Super League has shown a fairly good overall offensive ability recently. They can basically score goals in each game. The Bali United's performance is somewhat inferior to Yongyakaada, but both teams have goal - scoring capabilities, yet they are not favored in terms of data. In terms of strength comparison, Yongyakaada takes the initiative by leveraging its home - field advantage. In 8 games, it has won 3, drawn 3, and lost only 2. Yongyakaada has performed well recently. In recent matches, it has played a defensive - counterattack tactic. Its active attack ability is insufficient, making it seem rather passive. The Bali United's performance is also okay, but it is not as good as Yongyakaada in combat. In their previous encounter, the Bali United had an advantage in history. In this round, Yongyakaada is going all out for victory. Can Yongyakaada continue to win? Suggestion: Choose Yongyakaada with a
      AH
      IDN ISL PSIM Yogyakarta 3-3 Bali United
    • udadhe
      udadhe Won 6/10
      PSIM Yogyakarta datang ke pertandingan ini setelah bermain imbang 2-2 melawan Persik Kediri di ajang Liga 1. Dalam laga tersebut, PSIM menunjukkan daya juang yang baik dengan mampu membalas dan menjaga keseimbangan skor hingga akhir pertandingan. Dalam enam pertandingan terakhir, tim asal Yogyakarta itu mencatatkan tujuh gol, dengan rata-rata lebih dari satu gol per laga. Produktivitas tersebut memperlihatkan bahwa lini serang mereka cukup konsisten, meskipun stabilitas permainan masih perlu ditingkatkan agar mampu mengamankan kemenangan secara rutin. Di sisi lain, Bali United tengah berada dalam tren kurang meyakinkan setelah menelan kekalahan dari Persija Jakarta pada laga sebelumnya. Dalam enam pertandingan terakhir, tim asuhan Stefano Cugurra mampu mencetak sembilan gol dengan rata-rata 1,5 gol per pertandingan. Catatan tersebut menunjukkan bahwa Bali United tetap memiliki ketajaman di lini depan, namun hasil akhir pertandingan belum sepenuhnya konsisten. Kombinasi antara produktiv
      1x2
      IDN ISL PSIM Yogyakarta 3-3 Bali United
    More Recommend
    • Fiorentina VS Pisa I'm a well - known expert, providing long - term and stable information. This is a set of high - quality long - term products tailored for everyone! In the recent 6 games, Florence's average on - target conversion rate is 18.7%, higher than Pisa's 9.3%. Florence's xG efficiency reaches 1.12 (ranked 3rd in the league), while Pisa's is only 0.68. The key passing success rate of the home team (Florence) is 47%, leading the away team (Pisa) which is 32%. The offensive passing value index of Florence is 1.81, compared with Pisa's 0.93. In terms of midfield control, Florence's passing success rate is 89% and the transition speed is 4.2 seconds per time, while Pisa has only 81% and 5.5 seconds. Both teams' total running distances in a full - game exceed 105 km, but Florence has 28 more high - intensity sprints. View and suggestion: Home win. Suggestion: Florence -0.75 (Exclusive for big bettors) Florence averages 14.3 tackles per game (Pisa 9.1), 8.7 interceptions (Pisa 5
      AH
      ITA D1 Fiorentina - Pisa
    • Al Qadsiah VS Al-Ettifaq I'm a top influencer with a long - standing and stable track record in providing quality information. This is a long - term, high - quality product tailored for my followers! Al - Qadsiah's recent offensive conversion rate is 11.3%, lower than Al - Dammam's 14.8%. However, its xG efficiency is 0.93, higher than Al - Dammam's 0.86, which indicates that Al - Qadsiah has a better ability to seize opportunities. In terms of key passing success rate, it's 42% for Al - Qadsiah and 38% for Al - Dammam. The value of forward passes is 0.78 for Al - Qadsiah and 0.65 for Al - Dammam. Al - Dammam has a slightly better passing and ball - control quality. Al - Qadsiah has a 51% midfield control rate, a slight advantage. But Al - Dammam's average transition speed is 1.8 seconds, 0.3 seconds faster. In terms of running distance, Al - Qadsiah's total team distance is 109 km, 1.2 km more than Al - Dammam. The number of high - intensity sprints is 127 for Al - Qadsiah and 115 f
      O/U
      SPL Al Qadsiah - Al-Ettifaq
    • Damac FC VS Al-Ahli SFC I'm a leading expert with long - term and stable information. This is a long - term high - quality product tailored for everyone! Al Ittihad has an offensive conversion rate of 35%, leading Damac by 22%. Its xG efficiency is 1.2 times that of Damac's 0.8. The key pass success rate is 65% compared to Damac's 45%, and the value of forward passes is 12.3 versus 8.7. Al Ittihad's midfield control rate is 62%, suppressing Damac's 38%. The average transition speed is 25 seconds, faster than Damac's 38 seconds. Al Ittihad runs 112 kilometers, exceeding Damac's 105 kilometers, and has 48 high - intensity sprints, 16 more than Damac. View and suggestion: Away team victory. Suggestion: Al Ittihad -1.5 (Exclusive for big players). In terms of defense, the number of tackles is 18 vs 12, interceptions are 10 vs 6, and clearances are 15 vs 9. The offensive efficiency conversion rate is 38%, far exceeding 25%, and the xG comparison is 2.1:0.9. Al Ittihad comprehensively domi
      AH
      SPL Damac FC - Al-Ahli SFC
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.