Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Loyal08>

    Iceland U21 VS Estonia U21

    UEFA - EURO U21 Qualifying
    Analysis More Tips
    Iceland U21
    Iceland U21
    Estonia U21
    Estonia U21
    Further Reading
    • Richard Whitehead
      Richard Whitehead
      Iceland U21 VS Estonia U21 Iceland U21 has been in a stable form in the recent UEFA European Under-21 Championship qualifiers. They've earned 8 points from 5 matches (2 wins, 2 draws, and 1 loss), with a solid defense that keeps the average goals conceded per game under 1. On the contrary, Estonia U21 has played only two matches in the last 30 days, and both ended in defeats. Their poor form indicates a lack of confidence and team cohesion. In the last three encounters between the two teams, Iceland U21 has dominated, securing 2 wins and 1 draw. In particular, the 5 - 2 thrashing in 2018 clearly shows that Iceland U21 has a significant edge in terms of hard - power and talent pool at this age level. Iceland U21 has been in excellent form, with their defense being particularly impressive as they've managed to keep their average goals conceded per game to under one. In contrast, Estonia U21 has had a tough time. They've only played two matches in the last 30 days, and both ended in defea
      O/U
      UEFA U21Q Iceland U21 - Estonia U21
    • BET ENSURED
      BET ENSURED Won 12/20
      Iceland U21 Stats In the last games, Iceland U21 has shown diverse performance statistics. They have a win rate of 30%, while their draw rate stands at 20%. On the other hand, they lost 50% of the games. Interesting aspects include a 30% rate of winning with over 1.5 goals scored and a 50% rate of losing while conceding over 1.5 goals. On average, Iceland U21 scores 1 goals per game and concedes 2 goals per game. Their clean sheet rate is 10% of the games, and the team scored in 70% of the games. Goals were scored in both halves in 30% of the games, and both teams scored (BTTS) in 70% of the matches. The combination of winning and BTTS occurred in 30% of the games, while a draw with BTTS was seen in 10%, and losing with BTTS in 30%. The match total goals were 0 goals in 10% of the games, 1 goal in 0% of the games, 2 goals in 30% of the games, 3 goals in 30% of the games, and 4 or more goals in 30% of the games. Estonia U21 Stats In their recent games, Estonia U21 has demonstrated varie
      AH
      UEFA U21Q Iceland U21 - Estonia U21
    • Johnson Vincent
      Johnson Vincent
      Match Analysis Both teams are competing in Group C, where Iceland currently sits in 4th place with 8 points, while Estonia is at the bottom of the table in 6th place with only 2 points. Iceland's Form: Iceland enters this match in solid form, riding a four-game unbeaten streak. They recently secured back-to-back victories against Luxembourg U21 (2–1 and 3–1) in late 2025. However, they will be without key midfielder Eggert Aron Gudmundsson due to injury. Estonia's Struggles: Estonia is winless in their last five matches. Their away form is particularly concerning, having lost 16 consecutive away matches. While they managed a 1–1 draw in the reverse fixture against Iceland in September 2025, they were dominated in their most recent competitive outing, a 6–1 loss to France. Head-to-Head: Iceland has a superior historical record against Estonia, with 2 wins and 1 draw in their last three meetings. Iceland has averaged 3 goals per match across these encounters. Predicted
      AH
      UEFA U21Q Iceland U21 - Estonia U21
    More Recommend
    • Germany U20 VS Czech Republic U20 I'm a professional analyst with a long - standing and stable track record in sports information. I've tailored a high - quality long - term product for my followers. Looking at the performance of the two teams, Germany U20 has a clear edge. Their average shot - on - target conversion rate is 28%, significantly higher than Czech's 19%. The xG efficiency of 1.15 for Germany U20 compared to 0.92 for Czech also shows their superiority in finishing. In terms of passing, Germany U20's key passing success rate is 62%, leading Czech by 15 percentage points. They also have a high - value passing rate of 0.87 times per 90 minutes in the front 30 - meter area. The difference in midfield control is remarkable. Germany U20 takes an average of 4.2 seconds to complete the first offensive finish in transition attacks, 0.8 seconds faster than Czech. Their overall running performance is also better. The team's average running distance is 10.2 km, with high - intensity s
      O/U
      EL U20 Germany U20 - Czech Republic U20
    • Malta VS Luxembourg I'm a professional analyst with a long - standing and stable track record, and I've tailored a high - quality long - term product for you. In recent performances, Malta has shown relatively poor attacking efficiency in the UEFA Nations League. In the past five games, their average shots on target per 90 minutes are only 2.1, and the xG efficiency is 0.87, which is lower than Luxembourg's 1.35. In terms of passing, Luxembourg has a significant edge. Their key pass success rate is 41.6%, 12.3% higher than Malta's. In the attacking third, they achieve 0.98 valuable passes per 90 minutes. When it comes to midfield control, Luxembourg dominates. They have an average ball - possession rate of 62.3%, suppressing Malta. Their transition speed and breakthrough efficiency reach 0.74 times per 90 minutes. In terms of running statistics, Luxembourg players also outperform. Their high - intensity sprints per player (14.7 times) and total running distance (109.3 km) are more than
      O/U
      UEFA NL Malta - Luxembourg
    • Gibraltar VS Latvia I'm a professional analyst with a long - standing and stable information service. This is a high - quality long - term product tailored for my followers. In terms of offensive efficiency, Gibraltar had 12 offensive terminations throughout the game, scoring only 1 goal with an xG value of 0.89 and a conversion rate of 8.3%. In contrast, Latvia had 6 offensive terminations, scoring 1 goal, with an xG value of 0.68 and a conversion rate of 14.7%. Regarding key passes, Gibraltar's success rate was 32%, while Latvia's was 28%. However, Latvia's front - field passing value index reached 1.15, higher than Gibraltar's 0.92. In the midfield area, Gibraltar had a control rate of 58%. But its conversion speed was only 0.47 times per minute. Latvia, on the other hand, created scoring opportunities through 3 fast - breaks. In terms of physical performance, Gibraltar ran a total distance of 107 km during the game, but they were 12 times behind Latvia in high - intensity sprints.
      O/U
      UEFA NL Gibraltar - Latvia
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.