Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Godswill Red>

    Willem II VS De Graafschap

    Holland Eerste Divisie
    Analysis More Tips
    Willem II
    Willem II
    De Graafschap
    De Graafschap
    Further Reading
    • Virak168
      Virak168
      In terms of handicap, the line is likely to be around Willem II -0.75 or -1, indicating expectations of a home victory by at least one goal. Willem II’s attacking quality and home advantage suggest they have the tools to cover this spread. However, De Graafschap’s resilience means they could keep the match competitive, particularly if they defend well and capitalize on limited chances. In conclusion, Willem II are the stronger side heading into this matchup, with better form, tactical organization, and home advantage. While De Graafschap are capable of causing problems, especially on the counterattack, Willem II are expected to control the game and create more scoring opportunities. For handicap bettors, backing Willem II appears reasonable, but the margin of victory may depend on their ability to convert chances efficiently and break down a disciplined opponent. ⚽
      O/U
      HOL D2 Willem II - De Graafschap
    • Lucas D
      Lucas D
      Willem II VS De Graafschap William II has shown strong competitiveness in their last 10 matches. With a record of 6 wins, 2 draws, and 2 losses, they've demonstrated consistent performance. In terms of attack, they scored more than one goal in 5 of those games. In the last 3 matches, they averaged 1.67 goals per game. On the defensive side, they only conceded 2 goals, indicating high overall tactical execution. On the other hand, Graafschap only managed 4 wins in their last 10 games. The win - loss ratio is quite unbalanced, and their offensive performance has been rather volatile. Although they've had some high - scoring games, their win rate is only 40%, and their goal - scoring consistency is low. When facing stronger opponents, there are uncertainties about their performance. In this encounter, whether William II can maintain their strong form will be the key to deciding the outcome of the game. The teams are separated by just one point in the standings, which means both are highly
      O/U
      HOL D2 Willem II - De Graafschap
    • Loyal08
      Loyal08 Won 7/9
      Willem II VS De Graafschap I'm a professional analyst with long - term and stable information. I've tailored a high - quality long - term product for my followers. In terms of offensive performance, Willem II has an attack conversion rate of 15%, higher than Graafschap's 11%. However, Willem II's xG efficiency is 0.8, lower than Graafschap's 1.2. When it comes to passing, Graafschap has a key passing success rate of 65%, better than Willem II's 58%. Graafschap also has a higher value of forward passes, with 2.5 times per 90 minutes compared to Willem II's 1.8 times. In midfield control, Willem II has a 54% control rate, slightly better. But Graafschap is faster in transition, with an average transition speed of 18 seconds compared to Willem II's 23 seconds. In terms of physical performance, Graafschap runs 105 kilometers in the whole game, 3 kilometers more than Willem II's 102 kilometers. Graafschap also has an advantage in high - intensity sprints, with 27 times compared to Willem II
      AH
      HOL D2 Willem II - De Graafschap
    More Recommend
    • Flint Town VS Llanelli Based on the comparison between the initial and real - time data, one team seems to have a good chance of winning. Flint Town has an offensive conversion rate of 12%, lower than Llanelli's 18%. However, Flint Town's xG efficiency is only 0.85, significantly different from Llanelli's 1.25. Llanelli's key pass success rate is 47%, 19 percentage points higher than Flint Town. The value index of Llanelli's forward passes reaches 2.3, while Flint Town's is only 0.9. In the midfield area, Llanelli completed 28 effective transitions, compared to Flint Town's 12. The average transition time of Llanelli is 18 seconds, while Flint Town takes 26 seconds. In terms of the whole - field running distance, Llanelli runs 12% more than Flint Town. Llanelli also has 37 high - intensity sprints, leading Flint Town by 22 times. I suggest setting up app notifications to receive timely recommendations and enjoy daily surprises. Lanelli shows a strong performance in both offense and def
      AH
      Welsh PR Flint Town - Llanelli
    • Wycombe Wanderers VS Port Vale I'm confident in predicting the outcome of this match. Let's look at the statistics. In the past six games, Port Vale's key passing success rate reached 62%, higher than Wycombe Wanderers' 48%. In the attacking third, Port Vale's passing value (0.85) is better than Wycombe's 0.67. Wycombe's average offensive conversion rate is only 9%, while Port Vale's reaches 15%. Port Vale's xG efficiency (1.25/xG/90) is 18% higher. Regarding midfield transition speed, Port Vale takes an average of 12.3 seconds from losing the ball to the first touch, 2.1 seconds faster than Wycombe. In terms of total running distance, Port Vale leads with 109 km compared to Wycombe's 112 km, and the number of high - intensity sprints (142 times) exceeds Wycombe by 27 times. Based on these data, Port Vale seems to have a significant advantage in many aspects, and they are more likely to win this game. In terms of recent defensive performance, Port Vale shows stronger stability compared
      AH
      ENG L1 Wycombe Wanderers - Port Vale
    • Blackpool VS Burton Albion When comparing the initial odds with the real - time data, the advantage seems clear. Blackpool has had a relatively poor offensive record recently. In their last five matches, their offensive conversion rate is only 8.7%, and their xG efficiency value of 0.83 is lower than the league average of 1.05. On the other hand, Burton shows better performance in several aspects. Their key pass success rate reaches 68%, while Blackpool's is only 49%. In terms of offensive opportunities, Burton creates 0.7 xG opportunities per 90 minutes through their forward passes. In terms of midfield transition speed, Burton is much faster, with a transition time of 3.2 seconds compared to Blackpool's 4.1 seconds. Burton also has a higher average running distance of 109 km per game, while Blackpool runs 104 km on average. Moreover, Burton has 112 high - intensity sprints per game, more than Blackpool's 93. Overall, considering these factors, the odds seem to be in Burton's favor. B
      AH
      ENG L1 Blackpool - Burton Albion
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.