Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Loyal08>

    Marseille VS Metz

    France Ligue 1
    Analysis More Tips
    Marseille
    Marseille
    Metz
    Metz
    Further Reading
    • Rowland🤍
      Rowland🤍
      Marseille VS Metz Marseille has shown some fluctuations in their recent Ligue 1 performances. In their last 10 games, they've managed 4 wins, 2 draws, and 4 losses, with a win - rate of just 40%. Moreover, their overall winning probability hasn't exceeded 30%. On the offensive end, Marseille's attacking efficiency has been inconsistent. Nearly half of their goals in recent games were scored in the first half, and most of them were odd - numbered goals. This indicates that their front - line might lack sufficient and continuous output at crucial moments. In contrast, Metz's situation in the last 10 games is even more challenging. Among their 5 wins, none came from away games. They've faced consecutive losses and draws recently, remaining winless in the last 3 games. When looking at the data, Metz has often failed to achieve satisfactory goal results against strong opponents in the past few matches. Their offensive firepower is notably insufficient, especially in away games. Visit latest
      AH
      FRA D1 Marseille - Metz
    • Apoorv
      Apoorv
      Marseille VS Metz Marseille has shown a remarkable edge in offensive efficiency recently. In their last five matches, their offensive conversion rate reached 18.3%, significantly higher than Metz's 12.1%. In terms of key passes, Marseille's success rate stands at 78.4%, leading Metz's 65.2%. The value of their forward passes is also more prominent, with 0.42 per pass, compared to Metz's 0.29. When it comes to midfield control, Marseille has an average ball - possession time of 41 minutes, 6 minutes more than Metz. Their counter - attack speed is 1.8 times per minute. In high - intensity running statistics, Marseille's average running distance per match is 112 kilometers, accompanied by 19.3 sprints, comprehensively outperforming Metz's 103 kilometers and 14.6 sprints. Visit latest domain Nowgoal.net to get real-time livescore & live football streaming Marseille has shown dominance on the defensive end, with an average of 14.2 tackles and 8.7 interceptions per game. In contrast, Metz on
      AH
      FRA D1 Marseille - Metz
    • rebbeca
      rebbeca
      Marseille VS Metz Marseille has had 4 wins, 2 draws, and 4 losses in their last 10 games. They played extremely well in their last match. On the other hand, Metz has 0 wins, 3 draws, and 7 losses in their last 10 games. The recent performance of Metz is quite different from that of Marseille. Marseille's good performance in the last game has greatly boosted the morale of their players. Metz's performance is also commendable, with a slight edge in terms of strength and a better recent form. However, they lost 2 out of their last 3 games, which has significantly reduced their combat effectiveness. In their 6 home games, Metz achieved 4 wins and 2 losses, which is quite impressive. But Metz has a poor goal - scoring ability and concedes many goals. The gap between their offense and defense is not large, and they are easily affected by the opponent's momentum. Their overall defensive ability is rather weak. In this game, Metz is highly motivated to win. We'll just have to wait and see how
      AH
      FRA D1 Marseille - Metz
    More Recommend
    • Augsburg VS TSG Hoffenheim I've crafted a long - term high - quality product tailored for my followers. Looking at the recent form of the two teams, Hoffenheim has shown remarkable attacking efficiency in the Bundesliga. In their last five league games, Hoffenheim's offensive conversion rate reached 18.7%, significantly higher than Augsburg's 12.3%. Their xG efficiency value of 1.08 places them among the top five in the league. In terms of passing, Hoffenheim's key passing success rate stands at 42%, compared to Augsburg's 29%. The passing value index in the front 30 - meter area is +0.67, indicating a lead. When it comes to the speed of midfield transitions, Hoffenheim is much quicker. They can complete the transition from defense to attack in an average of 8.2 seconds, while Augsburg takes 11.5 seconds. In terms of physical performance, Hoffenheim's total running distance of 108 km and 142 high - intensity sprints in a game are both more than 12% higher than Augsburg's. Visit latest
      AH
      GER D1 Augsburg - TSG Hoffenheim
    • AS Roma VS Pisa I'm a leading expert, offering long - term, high - quality information. For this match, Roma shows significant advantages in the offensive end when playing at home. In terms of offensive conversion rate, Roma has achieved an 18.3% conversion rate in the last 5 home games. This is much higher than Pisa's 10.7%. Also, Roma's average key pass success rate is 72%, while Pisa's is only 48%. The passing value index in the front - field for Roma reaches 2.1, compared to Pisa's 0.9. In midfield control, Roma has an average ball - possession rate of 62%, which gives them an edge. They can complete 3.2 fast - breaks every 15 minutes, while Pisa only manages 1.8 times. Regarding running data, Roma's players run an average of 107 kilometers per game. They have 215 high - intensity sprints per game, 42 more than Pisa. In the defensive end, Roma leads in both tackles (15 per game) and interceptions (10 per game). Visit latest domain Nowgoal.net to get real - time livescore & live foo
      AH
      ITA D1 AS Roma - Pisa
    • West Ham United VS Wolves I'm a professional analyst with a long - standing and stable information source. I've tailored a high - quality long - term product for my followers. Looking at the statistics, in terms of the offensive finishing conversion rate this season, West Ham United has an average of 9.8%, while Wolverhampton Wanderers stands at 11.2%. Moreover, Wolverhampton Wanderers has a better xG efficiency of 0.85 compared to West Ham United's 0.79. When it comes to the key pass success rate, West Ham United edges slightly ahead with 58%. However, Wolverhampton Wanderers shows a stronger performance in the front - field passing value, reaching 1.32 times per 90 minutes, 0.28 times more than their opponents. In the midfield control, West Ham United occupies 54% of the area. But Wolverhampton Wanderers has an edge in the transition speed, being 0.5 seconds faster at 3.2 seconds. In terms of physical performance, Wolverhampton Wanderers runs an average of 112.3 km per game, and thei
      AH
      ENG PR West Ham United - Wolves
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.