Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Loyal08>

    JEF United Ichihara Chiba VS Yokohama Marinos

    Japan J1 League
    Analysis More Tips
    JEF United Ichihara Chiba
    JEF United Ichihara Chiba 2
    3 Yokohama Marinos
    Yokohama Marinos
    Further Reading
    • Liam 665
      Liam 665
      JEF United Ichihara Chiba VS Yokohama Marinos Chiba Júbilo will host Yokohama FC in an upcoming match. Based on their performances this season, Chiba Júbilo is facing a tough challenge. They've only managed 2 wins, 3 draws, and 7 losses in 12 games, accumulating 9 points and sitting in 10th place in the league. Their home form is relatively better. In 6 home games, they've got 2 wins, 2 draws, and 2 losses, scoring 7 goals and conceding 8, ranking 7th in terms of home - game points. However, on the road, they've suffered 4 consecutive defeats, scoring only 4 goals while conceding 10, which is a worrying slump. On the other hand, Yokohama FC, the visiting team, has a slight edge in the overall record. With 4 wins, 0 draws, and 8 losses, they've amassed 12 points and are in 8th place. Although their home form has been inconsistent, they've managed 2 wins and 4 losses in their last 6 games, showing some competitiveness. Visit latest domain Nowgoal.net to get real - time livescore & live
      AH
      JPN D1 JEF United Ichihara Chiba 2-3 Yokohama Marinos
    • BET ENSURED
      BET ENSURED Won 4/4
      JEF Utd Chiba Stats In the last games, JEF Utd Chiba has shown diverse performance statistics. They have a win rate of 20%, while their draw rate stands at 20%. On the other hand, they lost 60% of the games. Interesting aspects include a 20% rate of winning with over 1.5 goals scored and a 50% rate of losing while conceding over 1.5 goals. On average, JEF Utd Chiba scores 1 goals per game and concedes 2 goals per game. Their clean sheet rate is 0% of the games, and the team scored in 80% of the games. Goals were scored in both halves in 10% of the games, and both teams scored (BTTS) in 80% of the matches. The combination of winning and BTTS occurred in 20% of the games, while a draw with BTTS was seen in 20%, and losing with BTTS in 40%. The match total goals were 0 goals in 0% of the games, 1 goal in 10% of the games, 2 goals in 30% of the games, 3 goals in 50% of the games, and 4 or more goals in 10% of the games. Yokohama F-Marinos Stats In their recent games, Yokohama F-Marinos has
      AH
      JPN D1 JEF United Ichihara Chiba 2-3 Yokohama Marinos
    • Rowland🤍
      Rowland🤍
      JEF United Ichihara Chiba VS Yokohama Marinos Yokohama F. Marinos may have the upper hand in terms of strength, but their defense is in disarray and their form has been inconsistent. This gives Chiba F.C. a chance to grab some points. The major issue with Chiba F.C. is the lack of stability in their attacking end. Although their home - defense shows some resilience (conceding only 8 goals in the last 6 home games), their forwards are poor at seizing opportunities. As a result, the team often loses points even when the game situation is not unfavorable. However, Chiba F.C. has a relatively complete lineup. Only long - term injured players like Yuta Ueda and Kazuki Tanaka are absent, allowing the team to field a full - strength squad. Facing a Yokohama side with a damaged defense, Chiba F.C. can take advantage of their home - field advantage to look for counter - attack opportunities. Visit latest domain Nowgoal.net to get real - time livescore & live football streaming Chiba Júbilo is
      AH
      JPN D1 JEF United Ichihara Chiba 2-3 Yokohama Marinos
    More Recommend
    • Inter Turku VS HJK Helsinki I'm a professional analyst with a long - standing and stable record of providing high - quality information. I've tailored a long - term and top - notch product for my followers. In this season, Turku International has an offensive conversion rate of 24%, which is lower than Helsinki's 31%. Moreover, Turku International's xG efficiency is only 0.85, far behind Helsinki's 1.12. In terms of key pass success rate, Helsinki leads by 12 percentage points, reaching 67%. Its forward - field passing value creates 0.7 absolute goal - scoring opportunities every 30 minutes. The midfield control statistics show that Helsinki has a ball - possession rate of 58%, suppressing its opponent. On average, it is 1.3 seconds faster in transition speed, which can trigger quick counter - attacks. Visit latest domain Nowgoal.net to get real - time livescore & live football streaming Helsinki has shown a clear edge over Turku International in multiple aspects. In terms of physical
      0
      FIN D1 Inter Turku - HJK Helsinki
    • Den Bosch VS Almere City FC I'm a key expert with a long - standing stable information source, and I've tailored a high - quality long - term product for my followers. Deventer has a significant edge over Almere City in multiple aspects. In terms of offensive conversion, Deventer's offensive conversion rate is 15.6%, 58% higher than Almere City's 9.8%. Its xG efficiency is 1.07/xG, 30% better than Almere City's 0.82. Deventer also leads in passing. The success rate of key passes is 61% compared to Almere City's 47%, and the value of front - court passes is 1.32 per pass, while Almere City's is only 0.98 per pass. In midfield control, Deventer holds a 54% control rate, and with a conversion speed of 1.2 seconds per play, it exerts pressure on the opponent. In terms of physical performance, Deventer runs a total distance of 108 km, 9% more than Almere City, and has 142 high - intensity sprints, 15% more than its opponent. This shows that Deventer has a clear advantage in physical reserve
      O/U
      HOL D2 Den Bosch - Almere City FC
    • Tromso IL VS Brann I'm a professional analyst with a long - standing and stable information service. I've tailored a high - quality long - term product for my followers. In terms of offensive performance, Tromsø has an offensive conversion rate of 32% in the last 6 games, which is lower than Brann's 41%. The xG efficiency of Tromsø is 1.18, while Brann's is 1.45. Brann also shows superiority in passing. The key passing success rate of Brann is 72%, 18 percentage points higher than that of Tromsø. The value of forward passes for Brann is 0.92, compared to Tromsø's 0.65, indicating a stronger penetration ability. In midfield transition, Brann can complete a counter - attack in an average of 12 seconds, faster than Tromsø's 15 seconds. In terms of physical performance, Brann runs 112 km in a whole game, leading by 10 km, and has 28 high - intensity sprints, compared to Tromsø's 19. Visit latest domain Nowgoal.net to get real - time livescore & live football streaming Brann has a cle
      0
      NOR D1 Tromso IL - Brann
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.