Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Loyal08>

    Canada VS Ireland

    International Friendly
    Analysis More Tips
    Canada
    Canada 1
    1 Ireland
    Ireland
    Further Reading
    • Alfer
      Alfer
      Canada VS Ireland Canada has shown high stability in their home games. Their win rate stands at 50%, with a draw ratio of 40% and only 10% losses. Statistics indicate that Canada averages 1.1 goals per game, while conceding only 0.71 goals. They have a goal difference of 8, which shows they have some offensive power and a solid defense. The home team also performs well in terms of corner kicks and yellow cards, averaging 6.1 corner kicks and 2.4 yellow cards per game. In contrast, Ireland has a comparable away win rate to Canada at 50%. However, their draw ratio is slightly lower at 30%, and the loss ratio rises to 20%. Ireland scores more goals, with an average of 1.7 per game, but they also concede 1.5 goals, resulting in a goal difference of 8. Notably, Ireland has a higher away goal - scoring efficiency, with more shots per game than their opponents, indicating a strong attacking ability. Visit Nowgoal.net to get real - time livescore & live football streaming When facing a team as
      O/U
      INT FRL Canada 1-1 Ireland
    • Alpha Crypto Ads 💎🚀
      Alpha Crypto Ads 💎🚀
      Canada VS Ireland Canada's recent form in the competition has been on a steady rise. In their last six matches, they've achieved three wins, two draws, and one loss, showing a positive overall trend. Their offense and defense are becoming more in sync. The team has good physical reserves, with excellent running ability throughout the game. Their mid - field and front - field players have a strong attacking force, and their wingers have a remarkable speed advantage. They can continuously break through the opponent's defense, creating numerous shooting and set - piece opportunities. The midfield has a rapid pace of attack - defense transition and a wide interception coverage. It can not only strengthen the back - line defense but also quickly initiate offensive pushes and connect the front - field attacks. The finishing efficiency of the front - field players has been gradually improving, with multiple players contributing to the goals, ensuring a stable and abundant offensive output. Vi
      AH
      INT FRL Canada 1-1 Ireland
    • Colleen Hensley
      Colleen Hensley
      Canada VS Ireland Canada has won 5, drawn 4, and lost 1 in their last 10 matches. Ireland, on the other hand, has won 5, drawn 3, and lost 2 in the same period. Their overall performances don't show a significant gap. Ireland's form has been mediocre. Their recent performances have been disappointing, and they're currently in a slump. Canada, however, has been in a bit of a state of flux. Although their overall performance has declined, they've shown some improvement recently. They won their last game. Currently, Canada sits in the middle of the league table. In their past encounters, Canada didn't hold a clear advantage. Moreover, their performance in the playoffs was average, and their strength and form have declined significantly this season. Both teams are going through a period of inconsistent form. Ireland's current state is concerning, but they've shown some signs of improvement. Canada, despite a long - term decline, has played well recently. It remains to be seen which team wi
      O/U
      INT FRL Canada 1-1 Ireland
    More Recommend
    • KTP Kotka VS FC Haka I'm a well - known expert with a long - standing and stable information service. I've tailored a long - term high - quality product for my followers. In terms of offensive conversion rates in the recent 5 matches, Kotka's rate is 12.3%, lower than Haka's 18.7%. However, Kotka's xG efficiency is 0.83, higher than Haka's 0.69, which indicates that Haka has a lack of ability to seize opportunities. Regarding the key pass success rate, Kotka's 61% is better than Haka's 53%. But in terms of the value of forward passes, Haka creates 0.7 threatening passes every 15 minutes, more than Kotka's 0.4. In midfield control, Haka takes an average of 2.8 seconds in the transition phase, 0.5 seconds faster than Kotka. This results in a 23% increase in the efficiency of fast - counterattacks. In terms of physical performance, Haka runs 3.2 kilometers more than Kotka in the whole game. Haka also has 18 high - intensity sprints compared to Kotka's 11, showing an advantage in physical
      AH
      FIN D2 KTP Kotka - FC Haka
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.