Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Pi314>

    Latvia VS Faroe Islands

    International Friendly
    Analysis More Tips
    Latvia
    Latvia 0
    1 Faroe Islands
    Faroe Islands
    Further Reading
    • David adrian Perez
      David adrian Perez
      Latvia VS Faroe Islands In this international football friendly, Latvia will host the Faroe Islands. Both teams are mid - lower ranked in Europe, with a small gap in the world rankings. The main purpose of this friendly is to train and integrate the lineup, as well as adjust the competitive state, showing a practical attitude. In terms of the world rankings, the Faroe Islands are ranked 123rd, slightly ahead of Latvia, which is ranked 137th. However, the ranking gap doesn't fully reflect the difference in their recent form. Latvia has shown a steady improvement in their recent performance. They have an unbeaten record of 2 wins and 1 draw in their last three matches, greatly enhancing their stability. They previously defeated two Gibraltar teams. In the last friendly against Lithuania, they maintained a stable performance throughout the game and finally drew 1 - 1. Their control of the offensive and defensive rhythm has become more mature. Visit Nowgoal.net to get real - time livescore
      O/U
      INT FRL Latvia 0-1 Faroe Islands
    • Gilbert Joseph
      Gilbert Joseph
      Latvia VS Faroe Islands Latvia, ranked 137th in the world, employs a 3 - 5 - 1 - 1 formation. The team consists mainly of players from the domestic league. Their midfield lacks creativity, and the front line has no stable goal - scorers. They rely too much on crosses from the flanks, resulting in weak offensive capabilities when breaking through the opponent's defense. On the other hand, the Faroe Islands, ranked 123rd, use a 3 - 4 - 3 formation. Although their front line has some attacking power, their overall technique is rather rough. Their defense moves slowly and is prone to making mistakes under pressure. Visit Nowgoal.net to get real - time livescore & live football streaming Latvia has been in poor form recently. In their last five games, they've had no wins, one draw, and four losses. They've only scored three goals while conceding 11, showing an imbalance in both offense and defense. In the previous UEFA World Cup qualifier, they lost 1-2 to Serbia and have failed to keep a c
      O/U
      INT FRL Latvia 0-1 Faroe Islands
    • Marc Msc
      Marc Msc
      Latvia VS Faroe Islands Looking at the recent form of the two teams, there's a clear contrast. Based on the data from the past 10 matches, Latvia has been in a rather sluggish state. They've only managed 2 wins, 4 draws, and 4 losses, with a low win - rate of just 20%. In terms of their offensive performance, even when they've managed to keep their opponents scoreless in 60% of the games, their goal - scoring probability remains low. This indicates potential flaws in their tactical system. When facing stronger teams like Gibraltar, England, and Serbia in the UEFA Nations League and European Qualifiers, Latvia's defensive problems have been particularly prominent. For example, they conceded 5 goals in a game against England, highlighting the instability of their defense. On the other hand, the Faroe Islands have shown good form, especially in their recent away games. They've achieved 6 wins and 4 losses in the last 10 matches, with an impressive win - rate of 60%. They've also managed t
      O/U
      INT FRL Latvia 0-1 Faroe Islands
    More Recommend
    • Belconnen United VS Canberra White Eagles Bellconnen United has been struggling in terms of offensive efficiency, with a conversion rate of only 8.3%, which is lower than the league average of 11.7%. Their xG efficiency of 0.78 indicates that they are scoring fewer goals than expected. On the other hand, Canberra White Eagles are showing better offensive performance. Their key pass success rate is 74%, 12 percentage points higher than Bellconnen United. They also have a valuable forward pass rate of 1.35 times per 90 minutes. In the midfield, Bellconnen United has a weak control. After losing the ball, their transition speed is only 2.1 seconds, far slower than the 1.5 seconds of Canberra White Eagles. In terms of physical performance, Canberra players run an average of 11.2 kilometers, and their high - intensity sprints (23 times) are 4 more than Bellconnen United. I invite you to follow me to stay updated on more insightful analysis. Visit Nowgoal.net to get real-time livescore & liv
      AH
      NPLCF Belconnen United - Canberra White Eagles
    • Wynnum Wolves VS Eastern Suburbs Brisbane The Winnum Wolves have shown remarkable form in recent matches. Their offensive conversion rate in the last five games stands at 18.7%, significantly higher than Easton Saber's 12.3%. Moreover, their xG efficiency of 0.92 ranks third in the league, indicating a high - end finishing ability. In terms of offensive organization, the home team's key pass success rate is 68%, and the front - field passing value index is 1.15, while the visiting team's is only 0.87. This shows their precise offensive setup. When it comes to midfield control, the Wolves average a 57% ball - possession rate. Their transition speed index is 0.89, higher than the league average of 0.75, and they execute an average of 12.4 fast breaks per game. In terms of physical performance, they cover 108.3 kilometers per game and have 156 high - intensity sprints, compared to the visitors' 121. This clearly shows their superiority in physical reserves. Visit Nowgoal.net to get real -
      AH
      AUS QSL Wynnum Wolves - Eastern Suburbs Brisbane
    • KuPs VS Vaasa VPS In the comparison between KuPS and VPS Vaasa, VPS shows a clear edge in multiple aspects. In terms of offensive conversion rate, KuPS has a 28% conversion rate in the last five games, which is lower than VPS's 35%. The xG efficiency of KuPS is 0.78 per chance, while VPS reaches 1.12 per chance. Regarding key passing success rate, KuPS has a 41% rate, compared to VPS's 56%. In terms of the value of forward passes, KuPS only has 0.8 passes per 90 minutes, while VPS achieves 2.3 passes. In midfield control, VPS has a faster transition speed. It takes 2.1 seconds for VPS to make a transition, 0.5 seconds faster than KuPS. VPS also has a 67% success rate in fast - breaks. In terms of physical performance, VPS runs 2.3 kilometers more than KuPS throughout the game and has 11 more high - intensity sprints. Visit Nowgoal.net to get real - time livescore & live football streaming VPS Vasa has shown a strong defensive and offensive performance compared to KooTeePee. In terms of
      AH
      FIN CUP KuPs - Vaasa VPS
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.