Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Okiem Madridisty
251
Articles
0
Like
0
Follower
62.9%
Win Rate
+19%
ROI
65
Tips
1.92
Avg Odds
Member Ranking
-
1
x4payFollow78.6%Win Rate +41.8%ROI 14Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
2
NajibbbbbxcFollow75%Win Rate +35.1%ROI 22Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
3
Uefa ChampionsFollow75%Win Rate +53.3%ROI 12Tips 1.97Avg Odds -
4
ต.เต้ย 🍀Follow73.3%Win Rate +32.1%ROI 15Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
5
OC TIPSTERFollow73.1%Win Rate +32%ROI 29Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
6
El CapitanFollow72.2%Win Rate +25.7%ROI 18Tips 1.88Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
SUNYANI MAYOR🦉🎶Drogheda United VS Shelbourne In this Airtricity League encounter, a captivating battle is on the horizon. Drogheda United has shown lackluster performance in attack this season. Their offensive conversion rate stands at a mere 9.8%, significantly lower than the league average of 12.3%. Meanwhile, Shelbourne's xG efficiency is 0.78, placing them in the lower echelons of the league. In terms of key pass success rates, neither team has managed to break through the 55% mark. The offensive passing value indices of Drogheda United and Shelbourne are 1.2 and 1.1 respectively, indicating a lack of effective offensive organization. Drogheda United's midfield transition speed reaches 7.8 times per 15 minutes, higher than Shelbourne's 5.4 times. However, their possession rate is only 42%, which reflects their preference for quick counter - attacks. Both teams' average running distances per game are less than 105km, and the total number of high - intensity sprints is less than 120. This limited pO/U
IRE PR
Drogheda United
-
Shelbourne
-
Marc MscDrogheda United VS Shelbourne Both teams in this game have their own offensive challenges. Drogheda United has a low offensive conversion rate this season, at just 9.8%, which is below the league average of 12.3%. Meanwhile, Shelbourne's xG efficiency is 0.78, placing it in the lower - tier of the league. In terms of key pass success rate, neither team has managed to exceed the 55% mark. Their front - field passing value indices are 1.2 and 1.1 respectively, indicating a lack of effective offensive organization. Drogheda United has a faster midfield transition speed, reaching 7.8 times per 15 minutes, compared to Shelbourne's 5.4 times. However, Drogheda United only has a 42% possession rate, which reflects its characteristic of quick counter - attacks. Both teams' average running distances per game do not exceed 105 km, and the total number of high - intensity sprints is less than 120. Their physical reserves limit the intensity of their attacks. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2AHIRE PR
Drogheda United
-
Shelbourne
-
OC TIPSTERDrogheda United VS Shelbourne The attacking conversion rate of Drogheda United this season is only 9.8%, lower than the league average of 12.3%. Meanwhile, Shelbourne's xG efficiency is 0.78, ranking at the lower end of the league. In terms of key pass success rate, neither team has exceeded the 55% mark. The front - court passing value indices are 1.2 and 1.1 respectively, indicating a lack of offensive organization. Drogheda United's midfield transition speed reaches 7.8 times per 15 minutes, higher than Shelbourne's 5.4 times. However, its possession rate is only 42%, which reflects its characteristic of fast counter - attacks. Both teams' average running distances per game do not exceed 105 km, and the total number of high - intensity sprints is less than 120. The limited physical reserves restrict their offensive intensity. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming In this game, Sherbourne shows a clear edge in multiple aspects. In terms ofAHIRE PR
Drogheda United
-
Shelbourne
IRE PR
More Recommend
-
Naftan Novopolock VS FC Baranovichi Baranovichi has shown greater stability in offensive efficiency. Their offensive conversion rate of 18.7% is higher than Naftan's 15.2%. Moreover, the xG efficiency value of 0.85 indicates that they create better - quality scoring opportunities compared to Naftan's 0.73. In terms of passing data, Baranovichi's key passing success rate of 82% is significantly better than Naftan's 74%. The value of forward - field passes, at 2.4 times per 90 minutes, suppresses Naftan's 1.8 times. Regarding midfield control, Baranovichi recovers the ball 14.3 times per game on average and initiates 11.6 counter - attacks. Their offensive - defensive conversion efficiency is 27% higher than Naftan's. In terms of physical fitness, Baranovichi's total team running distance exceeds 112 km, with 23 high - intensity sprints, leading Naftan by over 9% in both aspects. I believe that only by making careful recommendations can we achieve long - term development. Visit Nowgoal.nO/U
BLR D1
Naftan Novopolock
-
FC Baranovichi
-
Ranheim IL VS Lyn Oslo Lanheims shows a stronger offensive performance this season. Their average offensive conversion rate is 12.8%, higher than Lian's 9.5%. The xG efficiency of 1.32 also indicates a better offensive quality compared to Lian's 0.98. In terms of key passing, Lanheims has a 78% success rate, while Lian only reaches 65%. This data gap shows that Lanheims' front - court organization is more penetrative. The value of front - court passes per game is 2.1 times for Lanheims, leading Lian's 1.6 times. Regarding midfield control, Lanheims has a 58% ball - possession rate and an average offensive transition time of 1.8 seconds. In contrast, Lian has a 42% ball - possession rate and a 2.5 - second counter - attack response time, which means Lanheims exerts more pressure. In terms of running data, Lanheims' total team runs an average of 112 kilometers per game with 195 high - intensity sprints, while Lian runs 105 kilometers and has 160 sprints, indicating that Lanheims has a phO/U
NOR AL
Ranheim IL
-
Lyn Oslo
-
Waterford United VS Shamrock Rovers Watford United ended 12 attacks in the whole - field, scoring only 1 goal. Their xG value was 1.2, with a conversion rate of 8.3%, lower than the league average of 12.5%. Shamrock Rovers ended 9 attacks and scored 2 goals. Their xG value was 1.8, and the conversion rate reached 22.2%. In terms of the passing success rate in the front - field, Watford United had a 64% rate with 3 key passes, while Shamrock Rovers achieved 78% with 5 key passes. The front - field passing value index was 2.1:1.3 in favor of Shamrock Rovers. Watford United had a 53% midfield control rate, but their transition speed was only 0.45m/s. Shamrock Rovers, with a 47% midfield control rate, boasted a transition speed of 0.62m/s. Watford United led in the whole - field running distance, covering 107km, but they had 38 high - intensity sprints, fewer than their opponents' 51. I believe that only by making careful recommendations can long - term development be achieved. Visit NowgoO/UIRE PR
Waterford United
-
Shamrock Rovers
BLR D1
NOR AL
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post