Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Okiem Madridisty>

    Jiangxi Liansheng FC VS Henan Football Club

    Chinese FA Cup
    Analysis More Tips
    Jiangxi Liansheng FC
    Jiangxi Liansheng FC 0
    2 Henan Football Club
    Henan Football Club
    Further Reading
    • pepper4455
      pepper4455
      The 2026 Chinese Super Cup tournament features a dramatic fourth-round clash between Jiangxi Liansheng and Henan FC. This is an official match with significant knockout implications for both clubs. Jiangxi Liansheng plays in the lower league with modest financial resources and a limited squad. Meanwhile, Henan FC is a representative of the National Championship with a much higher quality foreign player roster. Historically, the two teams have rarely met due to the difference in league standings. The disparity in quality is evident, as Henan has always competed at the highest level with extremely demanding pressure. Jiangxi has been in relatively good form in the lower league, winning four of their last five matches. However, their opponents were too weak and cannot compare to the significant challenges Henan FC has faced recently. Henan FC are in excellent form, having won three of their last five matches, including convincing victories against Beijing Guoan and Tianjin. Their sharp go
      AH
      CFC Jiangxi Liansheng FC 0-2 Henan Football Club
    • Predict To Win
      Predict To Win Won 13/20
      Henan FC competes in the top-tier Chinese Super League (CSL). Meanwhile, Jiangxi Lushan plays in the lower division, creating a significant gap in squad quality and competitive intensity. In this season's domestic cup competition, Jiangxi has been quite productive, crushing Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong 7-0 in the second round and defeating Dalian K'un City 2-0 in the third round. However, facing a CSL team will be a much tougher test for their defense. Henan FC competes in the top-tier Chinese Super League (CSL). Meanwhile, Jiangxi Lushan plays in the lower division, creating a significant gap in squad quality and competitive intensity. In this season's domestic cup competition, Jiangxi has been quite productive, crushing Fujian Quanzhou Qinggong 7-0 in the second round and defeating Dalian K'un City 2-0 in the third round. However, facing a CSL team will be a much tougher test for their defense.
      O/U
      CFC Jiangxi Liansheng FC 0-2 Henan Football Club
    • GideonJIlpos
      GideonJIlpos
      Jiangxi Liansheng FC VS Henan Football Club In terms of recent form, the offensive conversion rate of Jiangxi Lushan is 18.5%, which is lower than Henan Team's 24.3%. The xG efficiency of Jiangxi Lushan is 0.87, showing a significant gap compared to Henan Team's 1.12. Henan Team has a key pass success rate of 42%, 11 percentage points higher than their opponent. The value of their forward passes reaches 15.6 times per game. In the midfield area, Henan Team completes 18 fast transitions per game, 2.3 seconds faster than Jiangxi. The average total running distance of Henan Team is 112 kilometers per game, and the number of high - intensity sprints is 14% more than that of Jiangxi. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming In this CFA Cup encounter, the Henan Team holds a clear edge over Jiangxi Lushan in terms of offensive efficiency and midfield control. The Henan Team's offensive conversion rate is as high as 22.3%, 8.6 percentage points higher
      AH
      CFC Jiangxi Liansheng FC 0-2 Henan Football Club
    More Recommend
    • Naftan Novopolock VS FC Baranovichi Baranovichi has shown greater stability in offensive efficiency. Their offensive conversion rate of 18.7% is higher than Naftan's 15.2%. Moreover, the xG efficiency value of 0.85 indicates that they create better - quality scoring opportunities compared to Naftan's 0.73. In terms of passing data, Baranovichi's key passing success rate of 82% is significantly better than Naftan's 74%. The value of forward - field passes, at 2.4 times per 90 minutes, suppresses Naftan's 1.8 times. Regarding midfield control, Baranovichi recovers the ball 14.3 times per game on average and initiates 11.6 counter - attacks. Their offensive - defensive conversion efficiency is 27% higher than Naftan's. In terms of physical fitness, Baranovichi's total team running distance exceeds 112 km, with 23 high - intensity sprints, leading Naftan by over 9% in both aspects. I believe that only by making careful recommendations can we achieve long - term development. Visit Nowgoal.n
      O/U
      BLR D1 Naftan Novopolock - FC Baranovichi
    • Ranheim IL VS Lyn Oslo Lanheims shows a stronger offensive performance this season. Their average offensive conversion rate is 12.8%, higher than Lian's 9.5%. The xG efficiency of 1.32 also indicates a better offensive quality compared to Lian's 0.98. In terms of key passing, Lanheims has a 78% success rate, while Lian only reaches 65%. This data gap shows that Lanheims' front - court organization is more penetrative. The value of front - court passes per game is 2.1 times for Lanheims, leading Lian's 1.6 times. Regarding midfield control, Lanheims has a 58% ball - possession rate and an average offensive transition time of 1.8 seconds. In contrast, Lian has a 42% ball - possession rate and a 2.5 - second counter - attack response time, which means Lanheims exerts more pressure. In terms of running data, Lanheims' total team runs an average of 112 kilometers per game with 195 high - intensity sprints, while Lian runs 105 kilometers and has 160 sprints, indicating that Lanheims has a ph
      O/U
      NOR AL Ranheim IL - Lyn Oslo
    • Waterford United VS Shamrock Rovers Watford United ended 12 attacks in the whole - field, scoring only 1 goal. Their xG value was 1.2, with a conversion rate of 8.3%, lower than the league average of 12.5%. Shamrock Rovers ended 9 attacks and scored 2 goals. Their xG value was 1.8, and the conversion rate reached 22.2%. In terms of the passing success rate in the front - field, Watford United had a 64% rate with 3 key passes, while Shamrock Rovers achieved 78% with 5 key passes. The front - field passing value index was 2.1:1.3 in favor of Shamrock Rovers. Watford United had a 53% midfield control rate, but their transition speed was only 0.45m/s. Shamrock Rovers, with a 47% midfield control rate, boasted a transition speed of 0.62m/s. Watford United led in the whole - field running distance, covering 107km, but they had 38 high - intensity sprints, fewer than their opponents' 51. I believe that only by making careful recommendations can long - term development be achieved. Visit Nowgo
      O/U
      IRE PR Waterford United - Shamrock Rovers
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.