Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Pi314>

    Netherlands VS Sweden

    FIFA World Cup
    Analysis More Tips
    Netherlands
    Netherlands
    Sweden
    Sweden
    Further Reading
    • Sedinho ⚽️
      Sedinho ⚽️
      Netherlands VS Sweden The Netherlands started with a draw against Japan. They dominated with a 60% ball possession rate throughout the game, but conceding twice after taking the lead exposed their defensive concentration issues. They hold a significant aerial advantage. To secure their spot in the next round, they must win this game. The midfield linchpin, Frenkie de Jong, collided with Jurrien Timber during training, making his availability uncertain. Timber has been diagnosed with a concussion and will definitely miss the game. Meanwhile, Memphis Depay has recovered from his hamstring injury. Virgil van Dijk and Matthijs de Ligt will pair up at the center - back, combining experience with good recovery speed. Sweden, on the other hand, had a resounding victory over Tunisia in the first round. Alexander Isak had two assists and one goal, and Patrik Schick also had an assist and a goal. The team has no key players injured and can field a full - strength lineup. With a four - goal advan
      O/U
      World Cup Netherlands - Sweden
    • Freeman55
      Freeman55
      Netherlands VS Sweden My predictions have been highly accurate, with 7 out of 8 successful picks. I've dedicated two decades to football analysis. The head - to - head data between the Netherlands and Sweden clearly shows a significant difference in the offensive and defensive patterns depending on whether it's home or away. In the last three home games for the Netherlands against Sweden, the team won consecutively with scores of 2 - 0, 4 - 1, and 3 - 1. They averaged 2.3 goals per game while conceding only 1 goal, demonstrating absolute dominance at home. In the 2017 European Qualifier where the Netherlands defeated Sweden 2 - 0, the Dutch team established a 2 - 0 lead in the first half. They had a 62% ball - possession rate throughout the game and 12 shots, while Sweden only had 7 shots with a conversion rate of just 10%. On the other hand, Sweden's away performance has been lackluster. After a 1 - 1 draw in the 2016 qualifier, they lost 0 - 2 away in 2017. Their shot conversion rate
      AH
      World Cup Netherlands - Sweden
    • Smile Kyels
      Smile Kyels
      Netherlands VS Sweden The Netherlands dominates the game rhythm by controlling the ball in the midfield, while Sweden restricts the opponent's penetration through a compact formation and looks for counter - attack opportunities. The Netherlands usually adopts a 4 - 3 - 3 formation. In the front three lines, they maintain a close distance to implement high - pressure in the middle and front fields. The forwards retreat to assist the midfield in intercepting and cut off the opponent's short - passing lines from the backcourt. The two wingers are responsible for both dribbling breakthroughs and flanking pulls. The full - backs push forward in a timely manner to widen the offensive width. In the midfield, the two central midfielders have clear - cut division of labor. One is in charge of ball - holding, organizing, and distributing the ball to the flanks, while the other makes runs without the ball to attack the flanks of the penalty area. They use continuous short passes on the ground to
      AH
      World Cup Netherlands - Sweden
    More Recommend
    • FK Vitebsk VS Dinamo Brest Brest Dynamo has shown superior offensive efficiency in recent matches. In the last six games, their offensive conversion rate stands at 18.2%, significantly higher than Vitebsk's 9.7%. Their xG efficiency reaches 1.23 per game, compared to Vitebsk's 0.81. In terms of passing, Brest Dynamo's key pass success rate is 61%, while Vitebsk's is only 43%. The average value of their forward passes is 2.3 times per 30 minutes, far exceeding Vitebsk's 1.1. In midfield control, Brest Dynamo holds a 58% control rate, suppressing Vitebsk's 42%. They can complete counter - attacks in an average of 12 seconds, faster than Vitebsk's 18 seconds. In terms of physical performance, Brest Dynamo's total running distance in a game is 112 km, 3 km more than Vitebsk. Their high - intensity sprint ratio is 37%, compared to Vitebsk's 25%. Join our community to get more in - depth analysis! Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming Brest Dyna
      AH
      BLR D1 FK Vitebsk - Dinamo Brest
    • Palestino VS CD Magallanes In this Chile Cup encounter, a detailed analysis of the two teams' stats can offer insights into their performance. Palestino has a lower offensive conversion rate of 11.2% in the last five games compared to Magallanes' 15.8%. However, its xG efficiency of 0.82 is higher than Magallanes' 0.69, indicating that Palestino has a better ability to seize scoring opportunities. In terms of offensive organization, Palestino shows more threat. Its key pass success rate is 41% compared to Magallanes' 33%, and the front - field passing value index is 1.21 versus 0.98. Palestino also has an edge in midfield control, with a 54% control rate against Magallanes' 46%. But its offensive rhythm is hampered as its transition speed is only 2.3 times per 15 minutes, slower than Magallanes' 3.1 times. In terms of physical performance, Palestino runs 108km in the whole game, 12km more than Magallanes. Yet, it has 38 high - intensity sprints, fewer than Magallanes' 51, suggesting a
      O/U
      Chile Cup Palestino - CD Magallanes
    • CD Copiapo S.A. VS Univ Catolica Cobianpo shows a stronger offensive end compared to Universidad Católica de Chile. Its recent offensive conversion rate is 18.7%, 9.2 percentage points higher than that of its opponent. The xG efficiency is 0.82 per chance, 0.15 higher than the latter, indicating better finishing ability. In terms of midfield penetration, Cobianpo has a more significant threat. Its key pass success rate is 47%, and the value of forward passes is 12.3 times per 90 minutes, both leading the opponent by more than 12%. Cobianpo also has notable advantages in ball - possession and transition speed. The ball - possession rate reaches 56.3%, and the transition speed is 1.8 times per 15 minutes. It can achieve rapid offensive and defensive transitions through high - pressure pressing. In terms of physical fitness, the total running distance of Cobianpo in a game is 109 km, and the number of high - intensity sprints is 32 times, both exceeding the opponent by more than 15%. Thi
      AH
      Chile Cup CD Copiapo S.A. - Univ Catolica
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.