Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Boris MoscosoWon 15/17Follow88.2%Win Rate +54%ROI 18Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
2
🔥🐸 THE FOOL 🐸🔥Follow80%Win Rate +29%ROI 12Tips 1.86Avg Odds -
3
OC TIPSTERFollow79.2%Win Rate +39.9%ROI 28Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
4
Luis Antonio Lomeli BonillaFollow78.6%Win Rate +53.3%ROI 14Tips 1.95Avg Odds -
5
imaagination✨🐣Follow76.9%Win Rate +31.1%ROI 31Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
6
Games_ Under_OverFollow76.9%Win Rate +45.5%ROI 16Tips 1.92Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Sfiso_93Tor has shown a strong dominance at home this season. In their last five home games, they've achieved a record of 3 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss. They average 1.8 goals per game while keeping the number of goals conceded at 1.2, placing them among the top five in both attack and defense efficiency in the league. The team's key forward, Olafur, has scored in three consecutive home games. His personal shot conversion rate is as high as 22%, making him a crucial pivot in the team's attack. Tor maintains a possession rate of around 55% at home, with a passing success rate of 82%. Their wing attacks contribute 52% of the goals, especially showing high - efficiency execution in fast counter - attacks, averaging 1.8 successful counter - attacks per game. Notably, Tor averages 5.2 corner kicks per home game, far higher than the league average, providing sufficient tactical options for set - piece attacks. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming Tor's receAH
ICE PR
Thor Akureyri
2-4 Valur Reykjavik
-
LIMITLESS™ 🔥🤍Tor has a clear edge in the offensive end. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 25% (5 out of 20), with an xG efficiency of 1.2. In contrast, Valur only manages 15% (3 out of 20) and an xG efficiency of 0.8. In terms of passing efficiency, Tor's key pass success rate is 85%, and the value of their forward passes is 0.8 according to Opta standards, outperforming Valur's 75% and 0.6. When it comes to midfield control, Tor dominates the rhythm with a 60% ball - possession rate. They have an average transition speed of 3 seconds, creating threats through quick counter - attacks. In terms of physical data, Tor's total running distance is 120 km, with 15 km of high - intensity sprints. This is significantly better than Valur's 110 km and 12 km, which can support high - intensity offense and defense. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming Tor has comprehensive defensive data. They've made 20 tackles with an 85% success rate, 15 of which were inO/UICE PR
Thor Akureyri
2-4 Valur Reykjavik
-
Adin ReportsRecently, Thor has shown a lackluster performance in offensive finishing. In their last five matches, their offensive finishing conversion rate was only 6.2%, with an average expected goals (xG) of just 0.81 per game. This indicates a significant weakness in their ability to convert offensive opportunities into goals. On the other hand, Valur has been much more efficient in the attacking third. Their offensive finishing conversion rate stands at 14.7%, with an xG efficiency 62% higher than Thor's. This shows that they are better at capitalizing on their chances in front of the goal. In terms of key passes, Valur also has an edge. Their key pass success rate is 78.3%, compared to Thor's 64.1%. The value of their forward passes is 3.2 points higher per 90 minutes, which means they are more effective in creating goal - scoring opportunities. Valur's midfield control is also remarkable. They have a 61.4% ball - possession rate in the midfield. Their fast - counter conversion speed is 18.3AHICE PR
Thor Akureyri
2-4 Valur Reykjavik
ICE PR
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post