Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Ethan BlackabyFollow90%Win Rate +60.1%ROI 10Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
2
RinoandiFollow83.3%Win Rate +59.5%ROI 12Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
3
Imad masiFollow82.4%Win Rate +48.9%ROI 17Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
4
IqtidarFollow81.8%Win Rate +38.2%ROI 13Tips 1.84Avg Odds -
5
Rocco LambertiFollow81.3%Win Rate +40%ROI 34Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
6
WissywaxplanetWon 12/15Follow80%Win Rate +38.2%ROI 15Tips 1.76Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
GideonJIlposIn recent matches, the offensive capabilities of Villanova and São Bernardo have shown distinct differences. Villanova has been more active in attack, with an average of 12.3 offensive terminations per game and a shot - on - target rate of 42%. In contrast, São Bernardo only manages 8.7 offensive terminations per game, and its shot - on - target rate is 31%. The offensive termination conversion rate also favors Villanova. It stands at 18.7%, significantly higher than São Bernardo's 12.4%. In terms of goal - scoring opportunities, Villanova creates 1.8 per game on average, while São Bernardo can only generate 1.2. In passing, Villanova has a clear edge. Its passing success rate is 87.4%, and the key passing success rate is 38.2%. São Bernardo lags behind with rates of 79.6% and 29.8% respectively. The front - court passing value index of Villanova is 2.1, compared to São Bernardo's 1.4. When it comes to midfield control, Villanova holds a 64.3% control rate, while São Bernardo haO/U
BRA D2
Vila Nova
2-1 Sao Bernardo
-
Okiem MadridistyIn this Brazilian Serie B encounter, a comparison of the two teams reveals some significant differences. Villanova has a relatively low offensive conversion rate this season, averaging only 9.8%, which is lower than São Bernardo's 12.3%. São Bernardo also leads in terms of the success rate of key forward passes, with 82% compared to Villanova's 75%. The xG (expected goals) value further indicates São Bernardo's stronger offensive quality, standing at 1.42 while Villanova's is 1.15. In terms of physical performance, São Bernardo outperforms Villanova. São Bernardo averages 17.3 high - intensity sprints per game, more than Villanova's 14.1. And their running distance is 112 km per game, while Villanova only covers 108 km, showing São Bernardo's physical advantage. Overall, São Bernardo seems to have the edge in various aspects of the game. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming Staying updated on the latest football matchups, I've been cO/UBRA D2
Vila Nova
2-1 Sao Bernardo
-
Terrace TheoryVillanova has been in good form recently, winning 5, drawing 2, and losing 3 in their last 10 matches. In their previous game, they played excellently. On the other hand, São Bernardo's performance has been mediocre. They have won 4, drawn 4, and lost 2 in their last 10 games. Their away - game performance is not very good. Looking at their past encounters, there have been quite a few goals. Villanova has a certain goal - scoring ability. In this match, both teams seem to be evenly matched. Every game is crucial for their recent records, so both sides are highly motivated. In their past head - to - head matchups, Villanova holds a clear advantage. The question is, can Villanova withstand São Bernardo's strong attack? Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming Villanova has been in excellent form recently, winning 5, drawing 2, and losing 3 in their last 10 matches. The team's outstanding performance is due to the improvements in both offense anO/UBRA D2
Vila Nova
2-1 Sao Bernardo
BRA D2
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post