Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
IqtidarFollow86.7%Win Rate +44.1%ROI 17Tips 1.83Avg Odds -
2
RinoandiFollow83.3%Win Rate +59.5%ROI 12Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
3
Rocco LambertiFollow81.8%Win Rate +42.7%ROI 35Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
4
Reece MccallumWon 17/20Follow80.6%Win Rate +38.4%ROI 32Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
5
Imad masiFollow80%Win Rate +47.8%ROI 15Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
6
JesseJT 🔴⚪Follow80%Win Rate +42.5%ROI 11Tips 1.94Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Jose CidHarvey Dev starts with a 4-2-3-1 formation at home, adopting a high-pressure tactic to take the initiative in ball control. The double defensive midfielders in the middle stabilize the defense, while the wingers continuously attack the young full-backs of Amagil. They frequently launch high balls, targeting the weakness of the opponents' center-backs in height. The tactical goal is to establish a goal advantage in the first half. In the second half, they will rotate the substitutes to maintain the intensity, mainly scoring from corner kicks and flanks penetrations. However, there are some potential issues. The full-backs' forward runs leave spaces for counter-attacks behind them. But Amagil has a poor finishing ability, so it's difficult for them to convert these opportunities into goals. Also, the team is slow to get into form at home, with a low shot conversion rate in the first 30 minutes. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming Amaguel adoAH
INT CF
Hvidovre IF
3-2 Fremad Amager
-
Noah WillHarvey Dev has had a rough season, finding themselves in a slump. Their win rate stands at a mere 20%, with a 30% draw rate and a staggering 50% loss rate. Their offensive and defensive stats are completely out of balance. In all their games, the team has only scored 10 goals while conceding 22, resulting in a goal difference of -12. They average just 1 goal per game and 2.2 goals conceded, clearly showing major defensive flaws. On the offensive end, their efficiency has been consistently low. Scoring only 1 goal per game is far below the league average. Despite having an average of 5.6 corner - kicks per game, they've failed to convert them into goals, which indicates a rigid offensive system. In contrast, Amagail has shown overwhelming competitiveness. They have a 70% win rate, no draws, and a 30% loss rate. In all matches, they've scored 13 goals and conceded 9, with a goal difference of +4. They average 1.3 goals per game and only 0.9 goals conceded, demonstrating excellent offensiO/UINT CF
Hvidovre IF
3-2 Fremad Amager
-
Nö Lie Män📵The recent form of the two teams shows a stark contrast. Harwedeve has a solid offensive and defensive system. In their last five matches, they scored 8 goals and conceded only 4. With an average of 1.6 goals per game in attack and 0.8 goals per game in defense, they are quite balanced. When playing at home, Harwedeve has a great record. They've scored in three consecutive home games. Their wing attacks have been very effective, contributing 6 goals, which accounts for 60% of their total goals. The midfield also plays a crucial role, with a passing success rate of 85%, providing strong support for the attack. On the other hand, Amager has a scattered attack and a fluctuating defense. In their last five games, they scored 7 goals and conceded 5. Their average of 1.4 goals per game mainly relies on individual efforts from the forwards. Four of their games saw goals from individual breakthroughs, which means their attack lacks continuity. In defense, Amager's full - backs are slow in gettAHINT CF
Hvidovre IF
3-2 Fremad Amager
INT CF
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post