Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
343Follow90%Win Rate +53.2%ROI 10Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
2
Sedinho ⚽️Follow83.3%Win Rate +49.7%ROI 13Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
3
ApoorvWon 8/8Follow83.3%Win Rate +46.5%ROI 12Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
4
arpan paulFollow81.8%Win Rate +37.9%ROI 11Tips 1.82Avg Odds -
5
GideonJIlposFollow81.3%Win Rate +47%ROI 18Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
6
saidramadhanFollow77.8%Win Rate +35.7%ROI 29Tips 1.90Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Stef Olivier KIn recent matches, Golomya has been struggling with a low offensive efficiency. Their offensive conversion rate stands at a mere 10%, with an xG efficiency of 0.8. On the other hand, Levengorodny has shown better offensive performance. Their conversion rate is 14%, and the xG is 1.2. In terms of passing, Levengorodny has a key - pass success rate of 74%, which is higher than Golomya's 64%. They have made significant contributions in the front - field passing. In midfield control, Levengorodny holds a 44% ball - possession rate, allowing them to dominate the game rhythm. They have a faster transition speed and can effectively suppress their opponents with quick counter - attacks. Regarding running data, Levengorodny's whole team runs 110 km and has 40 high - intensity sprints. This physical advantage enables them to apply pressure throughout the game. Both Gomel and Liepaja have relatively low offensive efficiency in the league this season. Their offensive conversion rates in the last fO/U
BLR D1
FC Gomel
1-1 Neman Grodno
-
Logan WinchesterGomel has been struggling with a low offensive efficiency. Their conversion rate in finishing attacks stands at just 10%, and the xG efficiency is 0.8. On the other hand, Liepaja is in a better offensive state. They have a conversion rate of 14% and an xG of 1.2. In terms of passing, Liepaja leads with a 74% success rate of key passes, compared to Gomel's 64%. Their front - court passes contribute significantly to the game. In midfield control, Liepaja holds a 44% ball - possession rate, which allows them to dominate the game rhythm. They have a faster transition speed, and their quick counter - attacks can put pressure on the opponent. Looking at the running data, Liepaja's whole team runs 110 km in a game and makes 40 high - intensity sprints. Their physical advantage enables them to maintain a full - game pressing strategy. Overall, Liepaja has more advantages in this match. Both Gomel and Liepaja have relatively low offensive efficiency this season, ranking at the lower end of theO/UBLR D1
FC Gomel
1-1 Neman Grodno
-
cansuzenogullariGomel is one of the long-established clubs in Belarusian football and under coach Andrey Gorovtsov, it has recently gained a team identity that is quite difficult to lose, completely result-oriented rather than eye-pleasing football. When I examine the squad structure, the presence of promising talents such as Timofey Simanenka on the offensive line and the overall tactical maturity, I see that they have a more stable system compared to their opponents. His first three struggles in the league (currently 4th with 25 points. they are next) I think that the green-whites who want to maintain prefer a controlled game that does not compromise on defensive discipline, especially on their own field. The 1-0 win away to BATE and the 2-0 home win against Dnepr Mogilev in recent weeks also clearly show me that the priority of the team is not to give up on defensive safety. Neman Grodno, on the other hand, is going through a very difficult period under the management of experienced coach Igor KovaO/UBLR D1
FC Gomel
1-1 Neman Grodno
1
BLR D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post