Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
343Follow90%Win Rate +53.2%ROI 10Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
2
Sedinho ⚽️Follow83.3%Win Rate +49.7%ROI 13Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
3
ApoorvWon 8/8Follow83.3%Win Rate +46.5%ROI 12Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
4
arpan paulFollow81.8%Win Rate +37.9%ROI 11Tips 1.82Avg Odds -
5
GideonJIlposFollow81.3%Win Rate +47%ROI 18Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
6
saidramadhanFollow77.8%Win Rate +35.7%ROI 29Tips 1.90Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Marc MscIn this Belarusian Premier League encounter, the offensive situation is a key aspect to consider. Gomel has a rather low offensive efficiency. Their conversion rate at the end of attacks is only 10%, and the xG efficiency stands at 0.8. On the other hand, Liepaja is in a better position. They have a conversion rate of 14% and an xG of 1.2. In terms of passing, Liepaja also outperforms Gomel. Their key - pass success rate is 74%, while Gomel only manages 64%. Liepaja's passing in the front - field contributes significantly to their attack. When it comes to midfield control, Liepaja takes the lead. They have a 44% ball - possession rate, which helps them dominate the game's rhythm. They are also faster in ball - transition, and their quick counter - attacks can put pressure on Gomel. In addition, Liepaja shows an edge in running data. The whole team runs 110 km and makes 40 high - intensity sprints. This physical advantage allows them to maintain pressure throughout the game. Overall, LiO/U
BLR D1
FC Gomel
1-1 Neman Grodno
-
freekbassBoth Gomel and Levadia Tallinn have had a poor offensive efficiency this season, ranking among the lower tiers in the league. In their last five matches, their offensive conversion rates were 12.3% and 9.8% respectively, significantly lower than the Finnish Premier League average of 15.1%. In terms of key passing success rate, Gomel only achieved 61.4%, trailing Levadia Tallinn's 68.7%. The gap in the front - court passing value coefficient (0.81 for Gomel vs 1.03 for Levadia Tallinn) indicates a clear flaw in Gomel's offensive organization. Levadia Tallinn shows strong midfield control, boasting an average ball - possession rate of 62% and a passing success rate of 83% per game. However, the proportion of counter - attacks for both teams is less than 28%. The similar high - intensity running distances (108 km for Gomel and 105 km for Levadia Tallinn) suggest that the game is likely to have a steady pace. Overall, considering these factors, it's expected that the game will unfold in aAHBLR D1
FC Gomel
1-1 Neman Grodno
-
Boki 2KGomel has been struggling with a low offensive efficiency. Their conversion rate at the end of attacks is only 10%, and the xG efficiency stands at 0.8. On the other hand, Levengorod has shown better performance. Their conversion rate is 14%, and the xG is 1.2. In terms of passing, Levengorod leads with a 74% success rate of key passes, compared to Gomel's 64%. The team's forward passes have made significant contributions. In midfield control, Levengorod holds a 44% ball - possession rate, allowing them to dictate the game's rhythm. They have a faster transition speed and can effectively suppress the opponent with quick counter - attacks. Regarding running data, Levengorod's entire team runs 110 km and makes 40 high - intensity sprints. This physical advantage enables them to apply full - court pressure. Overall, Levengorod seems to have the upper hand in this match. The absence of the core forward due to injury will directly affect the offensive output of the home team. This player haAHBLR D1
FC Gomel
1-1 Neman Grodno
BLR D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post