Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
ApoorvWon 16/18Follow85%Win Rate +49.7%ROI 20Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
2
arpan paulFollow83.3%Win Rate +37.6%ROI 12Tips 1.81Avg Odds -
3
TPG Football TipsterFollow81.8%Win Rate +39.1%ROI 11Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
4
AbuleWon 8/9Follow80%Win Rate +22.8%ROI 10Tips 1.65Avg Odds -
4
ConstanceWon 8/9Follow80%Win Rate +25.5%ROI 10Tips 1.64Avg Odds -
4
WissywaxplanetWon 8/10Follow80%Win Rate +25.6%ROI 10Tips 1.61Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Angela MurphySarpborg has made a strong comeback, winning 3 out of their last 4 matches. This resurgence has helped them overcome the poor start where they managed only 1 win in the first 7 games. Currently, with a record of 4 wins, 2 draws, and 5 losses, their performance has been inconsistent. At home, they have a solid record of 2 wins, 2 draws, and 1 loss, scoring 6 goals and conceding 5. They are a tough opponent with a good balance between attack and defense. On the other hand, Viking had a great start last season and were on track for the title. However, a series of win - less games in the middle allowed Bodø/Glimt to overtake them. They then staged a remarkable comeback with a 7 - game winning streak and eventually won the championship by a single point. But this season, they started with a 1 - 2 away defeat to HamKam. Is it a sign that the "sophomore slump" has hit them? Viking has shown a strong competitive edge this season, with its overall strength ranking among the top in the NorwegiaAH
NOR D1
Sarpsborg 08
1-0 Viking
-
Iqbal ahmadViking has been in great form recently. Their average offensive conversion rate stands at 18.2%, higher than Sarpsborg's 13.4%. Moreover, their expected goals efficiency (xG/attacking end) is 0.14, better than Sarpsborg's 0.09. In terms of key pass success rate, Viking leads with 72% compared to Sarpsborg's 64%. The passing value in the attacking third (PPDA) shows that Viking exerts 7.8 pressures per opponent pass, indicating a more efficient attacking organization. When it comes to midfield control, Viking boasts a 46% ball - possession rate and a faster transition speed. They take an average of 3.2 seconds to switch from defense to attack, less than Sarpsborg's 4.1 seconds. In terms of physical performance, Viking's total running distance per game averages 118.4 km, and they have 32 high - intensity sprints, both figures are ahead of Sarpsborg's (116.2 km/28 times), showing a clear physical advantage. I have a professional team and can provide in - depth analysis of selected matchesO/UNOR D1
Sarpsborg 08
1-0 Viking
-
Panji SuryonoSapporo plays a 4-3-3 formation, using a combined tactic of flanking breakthroughs and central penetration. They aim to control the game's tempo through continuous front - court pressure. However, the team has been in a slump recently, winning only 2 out of several matches. There are obvious defensive flaws. When the flanks are broken through, there's a lack of effective protection in the middle, exposing the defense to the opponent's offensive firepower. As a result, they can't fully utilize their home - field advantage. Viking's tactical style is based on a 4-2-3-1 formation. They focus on the battle for control in the side - midfield and rapid flanking transitions. Relying on the organizational and linking role of the core midfielder, the wingers play a crucial part... Sapporo's tactical style centers around high - frequency wing breakthroughs and continuous front - court pressure. The team aims to create gaps in the opponent's defense through wide left - right ball movement. HoweveAHNOR D1
Sarpsborg 08
1-0 Viking
NOR D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post