Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Igodo oyounvieWon 7/7Follow90%Win Rate +39.7%ROI 10Tips 1.63Avg Odds -
2
Steven MarleyFollow85.7%Win Rate +43.4%ROI 21Tips 1.82Avg Odds -
3
Sheikh HammadFollow84.6%Win Rate +50.5%ROI 15Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
4
ApoorvWon 7/7Follow82.1%Win Rate +42.9%ROI 28Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
5
RinoandiFollow81.8%Win Rate +55.4%ROI 11Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
5
Analysis VIP99Won 9/10Follow81.8%Win Rate +45.2%ROI 11Tips 1.80Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Elon MuskRiga FC has shown a dominant form at home this season. With a 100% win - rate, they're scoring 2.8 goals per game on average, conceding only 1 goal per game, and boasting a remarkable goal difference of 13. Their 5.2 average corner kicks and 1.8 average yellow cards per game indicate a comprehensive edge in controlling the game and offensive - defensive transitions. On the other hand, Alashkert Armenia has a 66.6% win - rate away from home. They score 1.66 goals per game on average and concede 2, resulting in a goal difference of just 3. This clearly shows that their offensive efficiency is restricted. Looking at the overall league statistics, the gap becomes even more evident. Riga FC has an 80% win - rate, scoring 2.29 goals per game on average and conceding 6 in total. In contrast, Alashkert Armenia has a 60% win - rate, scoring 1.5 goals per game on average and conceding 8. In the upcoming Champions League encounter, these differences in offensive and defensive data between the twoO/U
UEFA CL
Riga FC
3-2 FC Ararat Armenia
-
Alex RussellIn the recent head - to - head encounter between Riga FC and Alashkert Armenia in the UEFA Champions League, Alashkert Armenia hosted the game and triumphed with a 2 - 0 scoreline. The match had a distinct pattern. In the first half, both sides failed to break the deadlock, and the score remained 0 - 0. It was in the second half that the home team, Alashkert Armenia, secured their victory through two efficient attacks. Looking at the corner - kick statistics, Riga FC had a significant advantage in creating corner kicks. In fact, they had six more corner kicks than Alashkert Armenia throughout the game. However, this offensive edge in corner - kick creation did not translate into goals. This indicates that Riga FC struggled with finishing in front of the goal. Despite having more opportunities from corner kicks, they failed to capitalize on them, showing a lack of efficiency in converting their attacking efforts into goals. This situation will likely influence how both teams approach thAHUEFA CL
Riga FC
3-2 FC Ararat Armenia
-
RmAtrebiIn a previous UEFA Champions League encounter, Ararat-Armenia's performance against Riga FC was defined by crucial statistics. Ararat-Armenia triumphed 2-0 over Riga FC. The game remained goalless until the second half. Ararat-Armenia's efficient offensive transition was the deciding factor. Notably, Ararat-Armenia dominated in corner - kick statistics, outperforming Riga FC by six corners. This indicates their strong tactical execution in set - piece plays and control on the flanks. On the other hand, Riga FC's significant deficit in corner - kick numbers led to a continuous lack of offensive threat. In the first half, they managed to hold a 0 - 0 draw defensively. However, they failed to create effective opportunities through corner - kick strategies. In the second half, they were caught on the counter - attack, which exposed the structural flaws in their offense. Tactically, Riga FC lags behind in the efficiency of wing crosses and the ability to compete for headers from set - pieceAHUEFA CL
Riga FC
3-2 FC Ararat Armenia
UEFA CL
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post