Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Pi314>

    Malisheva VS Vllaznia Shkoder

    UEFA Conference League
    Analysis More Tips
    Malisheva
    Malisheva
    Vllaznia Shkoder
    Vllaznia Shkoder
    Further Reading
    • Mr. Future
      Mr. Future
      Marisheva has shown strong form at home this season. In their five home games, they've achieved a perfect record, scoring 14 goals while conceding only 6. With an average of 3.5 goals per game and 1.2 goals conceded per game, their offensive and defensive efficiency far exceeds the league average. They also average 2.8 corner - kicks and 1.2 yellow cards per home game, demonstrating efficient game control and good discipline. On the other hand, Vilasnia has been in poor form on the road. In five away games, they've only won one and lost four. They've scored 11 goals but conceded 18, with an average of 3.6 goals conceded per game, indicating obvious defensive weaknesses. Overall, Vilasnia's win rate is only 20%, with an average of 1.6 goals scored and 2.6 goals conceded per game, being at a disadvantage both offensively and defensively. Their away goal - conceding rate is nearly 1.8 goals higher than at home. Tactically, Marisheva has built an effective offensive system leveraging their
      O/U
      UEFA ECL Malisheva - Vllaznia Shkoder
    • CouprieJR
      CouprieJR
      Marisheva has been extremely impressive in their home games. They've maintained an undefeated record in five home matches this season, scoring 14 goals while conceding only 6. Their average of 3.5 goals per game and 1.2 goals conceded per game far exceed the league averages. With an average of 2.8 corner kicks and 1.2 yellow cards per home game, they've demonstrated excellent control of the game and good discipline. On the other hand, Vilasnia has struggled on the road. In five away games, they've only managed one win and suffered four losses. They've scored 11 goals but conceded 18, with an alarmingly high average of 3.6 goals conceded per game, indicating significant defensive flaws. Overall, Vilasnia has a low win - rate of just 20%, averaging 1.6 goals scored and 2.6 goals conceded per game, showing clear disadvantages in both offense and defense. Their away - game goal - conceding rate is nearly 1.8 goals higher than at home. In terms of tactics, Marisheva takes advantage of their
      O/U
      UEFA ECL Malisheva - Vllaznia Shkoder
    • Kei R🐉
      Kei R🐉 Won 5/7
      Marisheva hails from the second - tier league of Kosovo. With limited overall strength, they lost 1 - 2 to their opponents in the first leg away. In the second leg on a neutral ground, they have to win to reverse the result, facing great pressure to grab points. Recently, in the domestic league, their offense and defense have been inconsistent. They rely on flanks to attack, but there are obvious loopholes in the defense during the transition phase. The team lacks a top - notch striker. When facing a compact defense, their goal - scoring efficiency is rather low. Moreover, they must push forward actively in this game, which will leave space for counter - attacks and lead to a significant increase in physical exertion. Vllaznia is a team in the top - tier league of Albania. Their league status is higher than that of their opponents. Holding the advantage of two away goals from the first leg, they have flexible strategic choices in this game. A draw will be enough for them to advance smo
      AH
      UEFA ECL Malisheva - Vllaznia Shkoder
    More Recommend
    • The recent offensive efficiency of Universitatea Craiova has been quite dismal. In their past matches, the offensive conversion rate was only 6.2%, and the expected goals per shot (xG/shot) was as low as 0.08. On the other hand, Dnipro-1 boasts a much higher offensive efficiency. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 14.7%, and the xG/shot is 0.4, far outperforming Universitatea Craiova. In terms of passing, Dnipro-1 has a key passing success rate as high as 78%, and their front - field passing value index reaches 2.3, significantly overshadowing Universitatea Craiova's midfield organization. Dnipro-1 also controls the ball well in the midfield, with a possession rate of 61%. Their transition speed is 12.4 meters per second, better than Universitatea Craiova's 8.9 meters per second. In terms of running, Dnipro-1 has an average running distance of 118 kilometers per game and 142 high - intensity sprints, leading Universitatea Craiova by over 4%. They clearly have an edge in terms of
      O/U
      UEFA CL CS Universitatea Craiova - ML Vitebsk
    • In this UEFA Europa Conference League encounter, Dečić shows a significant edge over Liepāja in multiple aspects. Dečić's recent offensive efficiency is notably better than Liepāja's. The offensive conversion rate stands at 18.7% compared to Liepāja's 11.3%. The expected goals per 90 minutes are 1.92 for Dečić, while Liepāja only manages 1.21, indicating a higher quality of offensive finishing for Dečić. In terms of key passes, Dečić has a success rate of 76.4%, far exceeding Liepāja's 63.1%. The attacking passing value index is 14.8 for Dečić, compared to 9.3 for Liepāja, suggesting that Dečić's attacking organization is more threatening. When it comes to midfield control, Dečić has a ball possession rate of 48.3%. The average passing speed reaches 8.2 m/s, much higher than Liepāja's 6.1 m/s. The frequency of quick transitions is 42% higher. In terms of physical performance, Dečić's total running distance reaches 112.7 km, and the number of high - intensity sp
      O/U
      UEFA ECL Decic Tuzi - FK Liepaja
    • England shows a higher conversion rate in the offensive end (18.7% vs 14.2%) and xG efficiency (0.21 vs 0.17). The success rate of key passes reaches 83%, better than Argentina's 76%, and the passing value index in the front - field is 21% higher. In terms of midfield control, England completes 412 successful passes per 90 minutes, with a faster passing rhythm. The transition speed is 12% faster than Argentina's. In terms of running data, England's total running distance is 118.3 kilometers, and the number of high - intensity sprints is 47, both higher than Argentina's 112.1 kilometers and 39 times. England has obvious advantages in physical fitness and pressing intensity. Join us and be part of our core group! England has a more systematic defense. Their average statistics of 8.9 tackles, 6.3 interceptions, and 14.1 clearances per game are all better than Argentina's 7.2, 4.1, and 11.8 respectively. Their high - pressure pressing forces the opponent to increase the error rate in the
      O/U
      World Cup England - Argentina
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.