Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Okiem Madridisty>

    Ham-Kam VS Tromso IL

    Norway Eliteserien
    Analysis More Tips
    Ham-Kam
    Ham-Kam 1
    4 Tromso IL
    Tromso IL
    Further Reading
    • richardᶜʳᶠ
      richardᶜʳᶠ
      Tromsø leads the league table with 28 points, boasting a record of 8 wins, 4 draws, and 2 losses, with a win - rate of 57.1%. Their home form has been particularly strong, winning 6 out of 9 home matches, with 2 draws and 1 loss. They've scored 18 goals and conceded 7, resulting in a goal difference of +11 and a win - rate of 66.7%. However, their performance on the road has been a letdown. In 5 away games, they've only managed 2 wins, 2 draws, and 1 loss, scoring just 4 goals while conceding 7, with a goal difference of -3 and a win - rate of 40.0%. This indicates significant defensive weaknesses when playing away. On the other hand, HamKam currently sits in sixth place with 18 points. They have a record of 5 wins, 3 draws, and 3 losses, a win - rate of 45.5%. Their home form is outstanding, with 5 wins and 1 loss in 6 home matches. They've scored 12 goals and conceded 7, a goal difference of +5 and a win - rate of 83.3%. Their 15 home points place them fourth in terms of home - game
      O/U
      NOR D1 Ham-Kam 1-4 Tromso IL
    • pepper4455
      pepper4455 Won 3/5
      Tournament Background & Official Fixtures: The match between HamKam and Tromso IL was originally scheduled for the end of June, but according to the updated official schedule of the Norwegian National Championship (Eliteserien 2026), the first leg of Round 14 will take place on July 18, 2026 at Briskeby Stadion. No match is scheduled between the two teams on May 22, 2026; instead, both teams were busy playing against other opponents in May (HamKam beat Lillestrom 2-0 on May 25, Tromso drew with Aalesund 1-1 on May 25). Eliteserien 2026 Standings: Tromso IL currently sits in first place with 28 points after 14 matches (8 wins, 4 draws, 2 losses). Meanwhile, hosts HamKam are ranked 6th with 18 points after 11 matches (5 wins, 3 draws, 3 losses). Investment assessment: Tromso IL has a strong motivation to defend their top spot, while HamKam is chasing the teams above them. The strength of league leaders Tromso is a reliable basis for investors. Head-to-head record (H2H): The head-to-head
      AH
      NOR D1 Ham-Kam 1-4 Tromso IL
    • Rocco Lamberti
      Rocco Lamberti
      Hanken has had a mediocre performance this season. After 11 league games, they've achieved 5 wins, 3 draws and 3 losses, accumulating 18 points and currently sitting in the 6th place. The team's greatest strength this season lies in their outstanding home - field performance, earning them the title of "home dragons". In the 6 home games this season, they've won 5 and lost only 1, with a staggering win - rate of 83%. They've scored 12 goals and conceded only 7, showing a strong ability to pick up points at home. On the other hand, Tromsø, the biggest dark - horse of this year's Eliteserien, is leading the league table with 28 points from 8 wins, 4 draws and 2 losses. The team has a well - balanced offense and defense. In 14 league matches, they've scored 22 goals and conceded 14, which demonstrates their high competitiveness. In the previous league game, they thrashed Valerenga 4 - 0 at home, so their morale is sky - high. Tromsø has shown dominant form this season, leading the Elites
      O/U
      NOR D1 Ham-Kam 1-4 Tromso IL
    More Recommend
    • Seinäjoki has an offensive conversion rate of only 12.3% this season, which is lower than the average in the Finnish Premier League. However, their xG efficiency stands at 1.42 per game, higher than KuPS' 1.14 per game. In terms of key pass success rate, the home - team Seinäjoki leads with 72%, compared to KuPS' 64%. The front - court passing value index is 8.3 for Seinäjoki and 6.1 for KuPS. There's a significant difference in midfield control between the two teams. Seinäjoki regains possession of the ball 41 times per game on average. With a running distance of 14.2 km per game and 83 high - intensity sprints, they can effectively connect between attack and defense. On the other hand, although KuPS has 12.4 interceptions per game on average, their 18.7 clearances per game expose the pressure on their defense. I believe that careful analysis and recommendation are essential for long - term success. The expected goals comparison shows a significant gap, with Seinäjoki's home xG o
      O/U
      FIN D1 SJK Seinajoen - KuPs
    • In recent matches, Oulu has shown a stronger offensive performance compared to Gnistan. Oulu's average offensive conversion rate stands at 18.3%, higher than Gnistan's 14.7%. The xG efficiency value also reveals Oulu's superior offensive quality, with 1.82 against Gnistan's 1.44. In terms of key passing, Oulu's success rate reaches 82%, significantly better than Gnistan's 74%. The front - court passing value index of 4.3 for Oulu against 3.1 for Gnistan indicates a more efficient offensive organization. In their recent head - to - head encounters, Oulu has an average ball possession rate of 47% and an average of 12.4 transition attacks per game, 3.2 more than Gnistan. Oulu's overall team also has a clear physical advantage. They run an average of 112 km per game and have 198 high - intensity sprints, surpassing Gnistan's 104 km and 172 sprints. I believe that by providing careful analysis, I can offer long - term value. In this Finnish Premier League encounter, I recommend that there w
      O/U
      FIN D1 AC Oulu - Gnistan Helsinki
    • In this Romanian League encounter, Cluj holds a significant edge in offensive efficiency. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18%, compared to Galati's 12%. The xG efficiency is 1.1 for Cluj, while Galati has 0.9. Passing analysis reveals that Cluj's key pass success rate is 78%. Their forward passes carry high value, creating four crucial goal - scoring opportunities. In midfield control, Cluj dominates with a 60% ball - possession rate. They can transition the ball quickly, with an average transition time of 7 seconds, effectively suppressing their opponents through fast counter - attacks. Running statistics also highlight Cluj's superiority. They cover a total distance of 118 km, with 210 high - intensity sprints, far outperforming Galati, which only covers 110 km and has 180 high - intensity sprints. This clearly shows Cluj's physical fitness advantage. I believe that by offering in - depth analysis, we can build long - term trust with you. In the defensive aspect, CFR Cluj h
      O/U
      ROM D1 FC Otelul Galati - CFR Cluj
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.