Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
GoalwireHQWon 5/5Follow80%Win Rate +48.1%ROI 10Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
2
arpan paulWon 9/9Follow77.8%Win Rate +38.4%ROI 19Tips 1.82Avg Odds -
3
Axel InsulanderWon 10/13Follow76.9%Win Rate +45.1%ROI 13Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
4
The french ladFollow76.2%Win Rate +47.8%ROI 21Tips 1.94Avg Odds -
5
Elvis Coleman 🙂↔️Follow75%Win Rate +30.3%ROI 21Tips 1.80Avg Odds -
6
SmolBeansFollow73.7%Win Rate +39%ROI 19Tips 1.91Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Yeorgava, currently sixth in the league, will host Riga Football Academy, who sit second on the standings.
Yeorgava has a relatively weak offensive output, with a low total number of goals. Their defense has many loopholes. In recent rounds, they've alternated between wins and losses. They mainly adopt a double - defensive - midfielder formation for a counter - attacking style. They create threats through wing crosses and set - pieces, but lack stability in breaking through the opponent's defense.
Riga Football Academy is in the title - contending group and has achieved multiple consecutive wins. They control the game rhythm with delicate passing and ball - control. They have strong offensive power on the wings and a balanced offense - defense system. However, after long - term high - pressing, there are obvious weaknesses in their wing back - defending and position - filling.
Further Reading
-
bensalemThe current form comparison between Jelgava and Riga Football Academy in the Latvian Higher League is quite distinct. Jelgava has shown significant fluctuations in recent performances. In their last 10 games, they have 3 wins, 3 draws, and 4 losses, with a win - rate of only 30%. Their defense has numerous flaws. In a Latvian Cup match, they suffered a 0 - 2 defeat to Riga Football Academy, revealing the fragility of their defense under high pressure. This season, at home, they had some bright moments, like a 2 - 0 win over Grobina and a 4 - 1 victory against Tukums. However, their away record is concerning. They lost 0 - 2 to Ogre United and only managed a 1 - 1 draw against Daugavpils on the road, highlighting the instability of their away - game defense. The fact that the big - goal rate in their last 10 games is only 30% indicates that their offensive efficiency is limited. Most of their goals are concentrated between 1 - 2, making it difficult for them to pose a continuous threat.O/U
LAT D1
Jelgava
0-1 FK Rigas Futbola skola
-
Yossi MedinaYelgava, currently sixth in the league, has been struggling with inconsistent results and a series of winless streaks. Their offensive output has been lackluster, with the forwards failing to convert chances effectively. Defensively, there are gaps in the backline's coordination and cover, and the team often resorts to a defensive - counterattack strategy at home, relying on the home - field advantage. Additionally, players commit too many fouls, and the midfield's interception ability is insufficient. On the other hand, Riga Football Academy, sitting second in the standings, is highly motivated to chase the league title and European competition qualifications. They have been on a winning streak and are in excellent form. Their gameplay focuses on ball control, penetration, and a combination of wing and central attacks. Their offensive and defensive systems are well - balanced and stable, and they have a high efficiency of getting points away from home. However, the mid - week EuropeanAHLAT D1
Jelgava
0-1 FK Rigas Futbola skola
-
LIMITLESS™ 🔥🤍In this Latvian Higher League encounter between Jelgava and Riga Football Academy, the latter shows strong signs of dominance. Riga Football Academy has a clear edge in offensive efficiency. Their offensive conversion rate stands at.24%, significantly higher than Jelgava's 15%. The xG efficiency is 1.2 compared to Jelgava's 0.8, indicating a better ability to finish high - quality scoring opportunities. In terms of passing, the key pass success rate of Riga Football Academy is 85%, while Jelgava only manages 70%. The value of their forward passes is 0.8 per pass, double that of Jelgava. This allows them to create more significant threats in the opponent's half. The midfield control rate of Riga Football Academy reaches 65%. They are also quick in transitions, with an average counter - attack time of just 8 seconds. When it comes to physical performance, Riga Football Academy runs 1.4 km in total, with 30 high - intensity sprints, outperforming Jelgava's 20 high - intensity sprints. ThiAHLAT D1
Jelgava
0-1 FK Rigas Futbola skola
LAT D1
