Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Alexandre de Quadros
338
Articles
0
Like
1
Follower
48.6%
Win Rate
-10.3%
ROI
37
Tips
1.92
Avg Odds
Member Ranking
-
1
GoalwireHQWon 5/5Follow80%Win Rate +48.1%ROI 10Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
2
The french ladFollow77.8%Win Rate +54.8%ROI 18Tips 1.96Avg Odds -
3
LACOBRAAAFollow76.9%Win Rate +38.7%ROI 14Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
4
Victor足球Follow76%Win Rate +35.7%ROI 26Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
5
Emile Smith RoweFollow76%Win Rate +35.1%ROI 25Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
6
arpan paulWon 11/13Follow73.7%Win Rate +31.5%ROI 20Tips 1.83Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Ofuayoma Peterson DeMocrat 🇳🇬Trenčín Spartak's players are responsible for holding the ball at the back and distributing it. The midfielders on both sides look for opportunities to make forward runs and attack the weak areas on the flanks of the opponent's penalty area. Up front, the team conducts a tight press to force the opponents into hasty and error - prone ball - handling. In attack, they can flexibly switch between cutting in from the wing and crossing from the by - line. They also look to create goal - scoring opportunities from set - pieces after the opponent's clearances. With multiple European competition experiences, the team's players have a high - level of understanding and coordination in passing and movement. However, the team has some weaknesses. The full - backs' frequent forward runs lead to a significant lack of defensive depth on the flanks. When facing a fast counter - attack, it's easy for the back - line to lose its defensive rhythm. The long - term running and ball - circulation cause thAH
UEFA ECL
Spartak Trnava
0-0 CSKA 1948 Sofia
-
Liam 665 Won 4/5Trenčín Spartak shows better performance in various aspects compared to CSKA Sofia 1948. In terms of offensive efficiency, Trenčín Spartak has an overall offensive conversion rate of 18%, which is superior to CSKA Sofia 1948's 12%. The xG efficiency of 0.74 to 0.42 indicates that Trenčín Spartak is more productive in the offensive end. Regarding passing, Trenčín Spartak has a key - pass success rate of 62%, leading CSKA Sofia 1948's 48%. The value of forward passes, 1.32 to 0.89, suggests that Trenčín Spartak's attacks are more threatening. In midfield control, Trenčín Spartak holds a 58% possession rate compared to CSKA Sofia 1948's 42%, which helps maintain a better passing rhythm. The average transition speed of 1.8 seconds is faster than the opponent's 2.4 seconds. In terms of physical performance, the total running distance of Trenčín Spartak reaches 112 km, higher than CSKA Sofia 1948's 98 km. The number of high - intensity sprints, 23 to 15, shows their physical adAHUEFA ECL
Spartak Trnava
0-0 CSKA 1948 Sofia
-
Borja Jiménez “El mago” 🤠Trenčín Spartak shows a better performance in various aspects compared to CSKA Sofia. In terms of offensive efficiency, Trenčín Spartak has a 18% conversion rate of full - field offensive finishes, which is superior to CSKA Sofia's 12%. The xG efficiency of 0.74 to 0.42 indicates that Trenčín Spartak is more efficient in the offensive end. Regarding passing, Trenčín Spartak has a 62% success rate of key passes, leading CSKA Sofia's 48%. The value of front - field passes is 1.32 to 0.89, showing a more threatening attack. In midfield control, Trenčín Spartak has a 58% possession rate, ensuring a better rhythm of ball - playing. The average transition speed is 1.8 seconds, faster than CSKA Sofia's 2.4 seconds. In terms of physical performance, the total running distance of Trenčín Spartak is 112 km, higher than CSKA Sofia's 98 km. The number of high - intensity sprints is 23 times compared to 15 times, showing a physical advantage. On the defensive side, Trenčín Spartak hasAHUEFA ECL
Spartak Trnava
0-0 CSKA 1948 Sofia
UEFA ECL
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post