Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Iqbal ahmad>

    Indonesia VS Cambodia

    ASEAN Championship
    Analysis More Tips
    Indonesia
    Indonesia
    Cambodia
    Cambodia
    Further Reading
    • Oscar El Monix〽️🐐
      Oscar El Monix〽️🐐
      Looking at the historical encounters between Indonesia and Cambodia, the home - team has an overwhelming advantage on its home ground. Based on the data from the Southeast Asian Games and international friendly matches, Indonesia has won all six home games against Cambodia. The specific scores are as follows: 2 - 1, 4 - 2, 3 - 1, 1 - 0, 4 - 0, and 8 - 0. Cambodia's away performance has been weak. In six away games against Indonesia, they have only scored 4 goals while conceding 17. Their average goals per game is 0.67, and the average goals conceded per game is 2.83. In terms of offensive and defensive efficiency, Indonesia scores 3.67 goals on average per home game, conceding only 0.67 goals, indicating a solid defense. Historical corner - kick data further confirms Indonesia's advantage. For example, Indonesia led in corner - kicks with a 5 - 3 score and a 6 - 3 score in past matches. Notably, in 2004, Indonesia achieved an 8 - 0 victory, demonstrating its strong offensive firepower.
      AH
      ASEAN Cup Indonesia - Cambodia
    • Jay Shikoyeni
      Jay Shikoyeni
      Indonesia hosts the opening match of Group A in the 2026 Southeast Asian Championship at Pakansari Stadium. The team's recent warm - up game ended with a 3 - 0 victory over Bali United. Head coach John Herdman stated before the game that Cambodia is a well - organized and disciplined team that shouldn't be underestimated. Goalkeeper Nadio Algavernata also emphasized not to underestimate the opponent just because of their first - game defeat. Cambodia lost 1 - 2 away to Singapore in their previous group - stage match. They conceded a goal in the first half, but defender Ouk Sovann equalized with a long - range shot from outside the penalty area in the 55th minute of the second half. Singapore scored a last - gasp goal in added time. Throughout the game, Cambodia showed an aggressive tackling and tenacious defensive attitude. Japanese - Cambodian midfielder Ogawa Yuta started the game, helping the team compete with the opponent in terms of ball possession. Indonesia's key player, Marceli
      O/U
      ASEAN Cup Indonesia - Cambodia
    • FRANKLIN CHIGB
      FRANKLIN CHIGB
      Indonesia adopts an aggressive playing style, mainly focusing on proactive pressure in the midfield and front - court. Relying on their high - energy physical condition, they carry out intense front - court pressing. Their efficiency in on - the - spot ball interception is outstanding, enabling them to quickly regain the ball and take control of the game. Recently, the team has shown a balanced offensive and defensive performance. They achieve an average of 22.7 successful front - court presses per game. The frequent deep attacks on the flanks, combined with the multi - point linkage in the front - court, can continuously pose threats to the opponent's penalty area. However, the team has a weakness in midfield lateral positioning. When the opponent makes a quick lateral ball transfer, the defensive line is prone to leave gaps in their formation. In a high - intensity and protracted battle, their defensive concentration may slightly decline. Cambodia needs to seize these opportunities,
      AH
      ASEAN Cup Indonesia - Cambodia
    More Recommend
    • I'm a professional who analyzes football matches. In this analysis, let's focus on the performance differences between Andijon and Bukhara. In terms of offensive conversion, Andijon has a slightly higher conversion rate of 18% compared to Bukhara's 15%. However, both teams' xG values are below 0.8, indicating low - efficiency attacks. When it comes to key passes, Andijon has a success rate of 62%, better than Bukhara's 55%, and its forward - field pass value is 12% higher. In midfield control, Andijon leads with an average ball - possession rate of 58%. But its transition speed is only 1.2 times per 90 minutes, while Bukhara has 0.9 times. Both teams cover similar running distances, but Andijon has 15% fewer high - intensity sprints. I have a professional team and can provide in - depth analysis of carefully selected matches. Bukhara has shown better defensive stats, with 14 tackles, 9 interceptions, and 6 clearances, compared to Andijan's 11, 7, and 4 respectively. In terms of offensi
      O/U
      UZB D1 FK Andijon - Buxoro FK
    • Klubi shows a significant edge in offensive performance. Their offensive conversion rate is 12% higher than that of Voluntari. The xG efficiency of Klubi stands at 0.85, superior to Voluntari's 0.62. In terms of passing, Klubi's key pass success rate is 78%, compared to Voluntari's 65%. The value of their front - court passes is 15% higher. In the midfield, Klubi controls the ball 62% of the time, suppressing Voluntari. Their transition speed is on average 1.2 seconds faster. Regarding physical performance, the whole Klubi team runs 118 km, 3 km more than Voluntari. The number of high - intensity sprints is 124 for Klubi, while Voluntari only has 98, indicating a clear physical advantage for Klubi. I have a professional team and can provide in - depth analysis of carefully selected football matches every day. Warentari's defensive stats show 18 tackles, 14 interceptions, and 11 clearances, which are 20% lower than those of CFR Cluj. On the offensive end, their conversion rate is only 2
      AH
      ROM D1 CFR Cluj - FC Voluntari
    • I'm a professional analyst who selects and analyzes matches thoroughly every day. Rosenborg shows a clear edge in multiple offensive metrics. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18.3%, significantly higher than Fredrikstad's 12.1%. In terms of xG efficiency, Rosenborg's 0.62 outshines Fredrikstad's mere 0.38. The key passing success rate also favors Rosenborg, with 61% compared to Fredrikstad's 49%. Moreover, the value of their forward - field passes is 12.7, much higher than Fredrikstad's 9.3. In midfield control, Rosenborg is dominant, holding a 58% control rate. Their transition speed of 1.2 seconds is quicker than their opponents. When it comes to physical performance, Rosenborg covers 112 km in the whole - field running and makes 15 high - intensity sprints, demonstrating their superior physical fitness. All in all, Rosenborg seems to have a strong advantage in this game. Rosenborg has shown remarkable strength in defense. They've made 14 tackles, 9 interceptions, and 6 clea
      AH
      NOR D1 Rosenborg BK - Fredrikstad
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.