Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> SUNYANI MAYOR🦉🎶>

    Philippines VS Myanmar

    ASEAN Championship
    Analysis More Tips
    Philippines
    Philippines 1
    4 Myanmar
    Myanmar
    Further Reading
    • Kingboss
      Kingboss
      Looking at the historical encounters between the Philippines and Myanmar, the home team, the Philippines, has shown a significant edge in corner kick creation and offensive efficiency. In an international friendly, the Philippines thrashed Myanmar 5 - 1. They also led 1 - 0 at halftime and had a 6 - 3 corner kick advantage, clearly demonstrating their dominance in ball - possession. In a Southeast Asian Championship, the Philippines played a 1 - 1 draw at home against Myanmar. However, they completely outperformed their opponents in corner kicks, with a staggering 8 - 1 record, constantly applying pressure in terms of ball - possession and offensive organization. When it comes to Myanmar's performance in their last three away games, in one of their losses, they conceded a 2 - 3 defeat with a 7 - 5 corner kick count, revealing obvious flaws in their defense. In another away game, they only managed to earn 1 corner kick, indicating a significant imbalance between attack and defense. The
      AH
      ASEAN Cup Philippines 1-4 Myanmar
    • MR SUPERPIDGE
      MR SUPERPIDGE
      Looking at the historical head - to - head records, the Philippines holds a significant home - field advantage when they take on Myanmar in the upcoming Southeast Asian Games. In their last encounter in an International Friendly, the Philippines dominated with a 5 - 1 victory. They led 1 - 0 at half - time and then extended the lead to 5 - 1 by the end of the game. The corner kick statistics of 6 - 3 clearly show the Philippines' control in possession and offensive power. When we review the past five meetings between the two teams, the results are diverse. The Philippines won the most recent one. Before that, it was a 1 - 1 draw in one game. Myanmar lost 2 - 3 on the road in another match, and there were also a couple of draws and a win for Myanmar in the earlier meetings. Given the Philippines' strong home - field performance in history, they are likely to put up a tough fight in this upcoming game. Looking at the historical head - to - head records, Myanmar has a poor record when pla
      AH
      ASEAN Cup Philippines 1-4 Myanmar
    • Iqbal ahmad
      Iqbal ahmad
      The Philippines has shown a clear edge in offensive efficiency. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18.7%, significantly higher than Myanmar's 12.3%. In terms of xG efficiency, the Philippines' expected goals for the whole game are 1.23, while Myanmar only has 0.68. This indicates that the former has a better ability to seize scoring opportunities. The key pass success rate of the Philippines is 62%, and their Passing Play Value (PPV) is 4.7. Both figures outperform Myanmar's 51% and 3.2 respectively. In midfield control, the Philippines averages 14 tackles and 9 interceptions per game. Their average transition speed is 1.8 seconds, 0.5 seconds faster than Myanmar. The number of high - intensity sprints of the Philippines reaches 82, and their total running distance is 112 km, both leading over Myanmar. I have a professional team and can conduct in - depth analysis of selected football matches. The Philippines' defensive performance has been dominant. They recorded 17 tackles, 12
      AH
      ASEAN Cup Philippines 1-4 Myanmar
    More Recommend
    • Thun is set to face Dinamo Zagreb away. Thun has an outstanding offensive efficiency. Their offensive conversion rate is 20%, higher than their opponents' 15%. The xG efficiency stands at 1.4 compared to 1.2. In passing, Thun leads with an 85% success rate in key passes, and the offensive threat is significantly enhanced by the value of their front - court passes. Regarding midfield control, Thun boasts a 60% ball - possession rate and a faster transition speed, which effectively connects offense and defense. In terms of running data, Thun has a total run of 1.4 km, with 15% more high - intensity sprints, indicating an obvious physical advantage. Thun's defensive system has comprehensively dominated the game. They had 24 tackles, 15 interceptions, and 30 clearances, all better than Dinamo Zagreb's 20 tackles, 10 interceptions, and 24 clearances. This effectively restricted Zagreb's penetration into the key areas. In attack, Thun's conversion rate of scoring opportunities reached 30%, f
      AH
      UEFA CL Dinamo Zagreb - Thun
    • In this Champions League encounter, I'm a professional in analyzing such matches. Let's focus on the performance of the two teams. The offensive efficiency of NK Celje is superior. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 13.3% (2 goals from 15 shots), significantly better than Egnatia's 10% (1 goal from 10 shots). The xG efficiency of 111% (2 actual goals vs 1.8 xG) shows their high - end finishing ability. In terms of passing efficiency, NK Celje's key pass success rate is 74%, higher than Egnatia's 65%. Their forward - field passes are more valuable, creating more threatening opportunities. When it comes to midfield control, NK Celje holds a 60% ball - possession rate and can quickly transition (average 8 seconds), effectively suppressing Egnatia's rhythm. During high - intensity running, the whole team of NK Celje runs a total of 1.4 kilometers, with 0.24 kilometers of high - intensity sprints. This physical advantage supports their full - game high - pressure pressing. In terms o
      AH
      UEFA CL NK Publikum Celje - Egnatia
    • In the Champions League encounter, Gratkorn Storm shows remarkable superiority over Heart of Midlothian. In terms of offensive efficiency, Gratkorn Storm has a clear edge. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 22%, while Heart of Midlothian's is only 18%. The xG efficiency of Gratkorn Storm is 1.35, compared to Heart of Midlothian's 1.05. Passing analysis reveals that the key pass success rate of Gratkorn Storm reaches 88%, much higher than Heart of Midlothian's 76%. The value of their forward passes is also higher (0.85 vs 0.65), which allows them to effectively break through the opponent's defense. In midfield control, Gratkorn Storm dominates with a ball - possession rate of 58%. They are faster in transitioning from defense to attack, taking an average of 7 seconds, while Heart of Midlothian takes 10 seconds. Running data further demonstrates Gratkorn Storm's physical advantage. Their total running distance is 118 km, while Heart of Midlothian runs 112 km. They have 150 high -
      AH
      UEFA CL Heart of Midlothian - Sturm Graz
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.