Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Iqbal ahmad>

    Philippines VS Myanmar

    ASEAN Championship
    Analysis More Tips
    Philippines
    Philippines 1
    4 Myanmar
    Myanmar
    Further Reading
    • Erudite
      Erudite
      Looking at the historical head - to - head records between the Philippines and Myanmar, the Philippines have shown a remarkable edge in attack when playing at home. In an international friendly, the Philippines thrashed Myanmar with a score of 5 - 1. In that game, they led 1 - 0 in the first half and had a 6 - 3 advantage in corner kicks. This clearly demonstrated the home team's efficiency in ball control and offensive organization. In a Southeast Asian Games match, the Philippines played to a 1 - 1 draw with Myanmar at home. The lopsided 8 - 1 corner - kick count highlighted the home team's ability to control the game's pace. Even in an away game in Myanmar, the Philippines managed to win 3 - 2. With a 7 - 5 lead in corner kicks, it further confirmed the team's tactical execution in both attack and defense transitions. Overall, the historical data indicates that the Philippines are a formidable force in their home games against Myanmar. Looking at the historical performance, the home
      O/U
      ASEAN Cup Philippines 1-4 Myanmar
    • Samuel Luckhurst
      Samuel Luckhurst
      The Philippines has been extremely dominant at home in the Southeast Asian Championship. This season, their home record shows an 83.3% win rate, a 16.6% draw rate, and no losses. They've scored an average of 3.5 goals per game while conceding only 1.7, resulting in a total of 14 goal difference. Their offensive efficiency at home is remarkable, with 21 goals scored and only 7 conceded. They also average 2.9 corner - kicks per home game, which reflects their ability to control the game and run an effective offensive system. Looking at the overall statistics, the Philippines has a 70% win rate, scoring 2.9 goals and conceding 1.7 per game. Their balance between attack and defense ranks among the top in the league. Notably, the average of 3.5 goals per home game is significantly higher than the 2.9 on the road, clearly indicating the advantage of playing at home. Moreover, the team averages 1.7 yellow cards per game, suggesting good discipline in the defensive end and a stable efficiency
      O/U
      ASEAN Cup Philippines 1-4 Myanmar
    • Zerbest
      Zerbest
      The Philippines has shown a stable form at home in the Southeast Asian Championship. In the last five home games, they've secured 3 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss, averaging 1.2 goals scored and 0.8 goals conceded per game. Their offensive and defensive efficiency is in the middle of the league. However, their key striker, Malcolm, is out due to injury. His goal - scoring ability with 5 goals this season will directly affect the diversity of the attacking end. On the other hand, Myanmar's away record has been dismal. In their last five away games, they only had 1 win, 2 draws, and 2 losses, scoring 0.9 goals per game while conceding 1.5. Their defensive flaws are obvious. Moreover, Myanmar's midfield maestro, Surawi, is suspended for accumulating yellow cards. The absence of his organizational and dispatching skills will lead to a further decline in the team's midfield control. Looking at the historical head - to - head records, the Philippines remained unbeaten in the last two meetings, wit
      AH
      ASEAN Cup Philippines 1-4 Myanmar
    More Recommend
    • I'm a professional analyst with a team, dedicated to providing in - depth analysis of selected football matches. Zagreb Dinamo shows clear offensive superiority over Thun. In terms of the full - field offensive finishing conversion rate, Zagreb Dinamo's 28% is better than Thun's 19%. The xG efficiency ratio of 1.8:1.2 further highlights their offensive edge. When it comes to passing, Zagreb Dinamo has a key passing success rate of 62%, while Thun only manages 45%. The value of forward passes, at 12.3:8.7, reflects Zagreb Dinamo's better ball - control efficiency. Defensively, Zagreb Dinamo's midfield interception success rate is 48%, much higher than Thun's 35%. Their average transition speed is 1.8 seconds per play. The total team running distance of 112 km is 6 km more than Thun's, and the high - intensity sprint counts of 23:15 demonstrate their better physical reserves. Zagreb Dinamo also shows more defensive initiative, with 18 tackles compared to Thun's 10, and an 8.4 clearance r
      AH
      UEFA CL Dinamo Zagreb - Thun
    • In terms of offensive conversion, Tsereteli has an 18% conversion rate, higher than Egnatia's 12%, with an xG efficiency difference of 0.45. Egnatia leads in key - pass success rate at 61%, compared to Tsereteli's 54%. However, Tsereteli has an edge in the value of forward - field passes, with 12.3 against Egnatia's 9.8. In midfield control, Tsereteli averages 9.2 tackles and 8.4 interceptions per game. Their average transition speed is 1.8 seconds, better than Egnatia's 2.1 seconds. Egnatia makes 112 high - intensity sprints throughout the game, but Tsereteli's running distance of 118 km is more impressive. On the defensive end, Egnatia has 15 clearances. Tsereteli has 11 tackles and 9 interceptions, yet Egnatia's interception efficiency is 12% higher. In terms of offensive efficiency, Tsereteli creates 6.2 scoring opportunities on average per game, with a conversion rate of 22%, which is higher than Egnatia's 15%. The xG comparison shows Tsereteli at 0.78 and Egnatia at 0.61, indicat
      O/U
      UEFA CL NK Publikum Celje - Egnatia
    • I've analyzed the performance data of these two teams, and here are my insights. Hartz shows remarkable offensive efficiency. Their full - field offensive conversion rate stands at 18.3%, significantly better than Graz's 12.1%. The xG value of 1.8 compared to Graz's 1.2 further proves their stronger attacking ability. In terms of key passes, Hartz has a success rate of 67%, leading Graz's 59%. The value of their forward passes is 14.2, much more threatening than Graz's 9.8. In the midfield battle, Hartz has a clear edge. They have 14 interceptions compared to Graz's 7, and they control the ball for 58% of the time. The whole Hartz team has an average running distance of 11.3 km and 42 high - intensity sprints, indicating better physical fitness. On the defensive end, Hartz is also solid. They have 11 tackles, 9 interceptions, and 6 clearances, effectively curbing Graz's counter - attacks. Graz, on the other hand, relies heavily on wing crosses for their offense. Their shot - on - targe
      AH
      UEFA CL Heart of Midlothian - Sturm Graz
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.