Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> JJ BEDDINGS>

    Philippines VS Myanmar

    ASEAN Championship
    Analysis More Tips
    Philippines
    Philippines 1
    4 Myanmar
    Myanmar
    Further Reading
    • ICEKHID
      ICEKHID
      The historical head - to - head records and recent data between the Philippines and Myanmar serve as the key basis for this analysis. The Philippines has a solid recent form. In their last five games, they achieved 2 wins, 2 draws, and 1 loss. At home, they have an unbeaten record of 1 win and 1 draw, with an average of 1.2 goals scored and 0.8 goals conceded per game. Their ball - possession rate is consistently above 65%. They showed excellent defensive skills when they defeated Thailand 1 - 0 at home, demonstrating their defensive capabilities. On the other hand, Myanmar's recent form is inconsistent. In their last five games, they had 1 win, 3 draws, and 1 loss. Their away - game performance is weak. In their last three away games, they only got 1 draw and 2 losses, scoring an average of 0.5 goals and conceding 1.3 goals per game. Looking at the historical head - to - head records, the Philippines has an edge, winning 2 out of the last 3 meetings. In the 2023 group - stage match, t
      AH
      ASEAN Cup Philippines 1-4 Myanmar
    • Samuel Luckhurst
      Samuel Luckhurst
      The Philippines has been extremely dominant at home in the Southeast Asian Championship. This season, their home record shows an 83.3% win rate, a 16.6% draw rate, and no losses. They've scored an average of 3.5 goals per game while conceding only 1.7, resulting in a total of 14 goal difference. Their offensive efficiency at home is remarkable, with 21 goals scored and only 7 conceded. They also average 2.9 corner - kicks per home game, which reflects their ability to control the game and run an effective offensive system. Looking at the overall statistics, the Philippines has a 70% win rate, scoring 2.9 goals and conceding 1.7 per game. Their balance between attack and defense ranks among the top in the league. Notably, the average of 3.5 goals per home game is significantly higher than the 2.9 on the road, clearly indicating the advantage of playing at home. Moreover, the team averages 1.7 yellow cards per game, suggesting good discipline in the defensive end and a stable efficiency
      O/U
      ASEAN Cup Philippines 1-4 Myanmar
    • Stockradamus
      Stockradamus
      The Philippines has been steadily improving its football level in recent years and currently ranks 135th in the world. The team has a diverse lineup with a total value of 3.05 million euros, making it a competitive force in Southeast Asia. Head coach Carlos Queirot emphasizes overall teamwork and tactical unity. In the past six matches of the FIFA World Cup and AFC Asian Cup qualifiers, the team remained unbeaten, with 4 wins and 2 draws. They scored 19 goals and conceded only 7, showing a balanced performance in both offense and defense. Notably, the Philippines has scored in nine consecutive games. When playing at home, their ball - possession rate and offensive efficiency increase significantly. However, they still sometimes struggle to break through a well - organized defense, which will be a key point to watch in this match. After unlocking, you can view details of the two teams' historical confrontations, analysis of key players' conditions, and data supporting the home - field a
      AH
      ASEAN Cup Philippines 1-4 Myanmar
    More Recommend
    • I'm good at analyzing unique issues and rare data. In terms of the game, Zagreb Dinamo shows clear advantages in multiple aspects compared to Thun. Zagreb Dinamo has a better offensive conversion rate. Their offensive end - conversion rate stands at 28%, while Thun's is only 19%. The expected goals (xG) value also reflects their offensive superiority, with Zagreb Dinamo at 1.8 and Thun at 1.1. In passing, Zagreb Dinamo's key - pass success rate is 62%, much higher than Thun's 45%. The value of their front - court passes is 12.3, compared to Thun's 8.7, which highlights their better ball - control efficiency. On the defensive side, Zagreb Dinamo is more aggressive. They have 14 midfield interceptions compared to Thun's 9, and 8 tackles against Thun's 5. In terms of physical performance, Zagreb Dinamo's total running distance is 112 km (assuming there might be a typo for Thun's 1.4km), and they have 18 high - intensity sprints, more than Thun's 12, indicating better physical reserves. Ov
      AH
      UEFA CL Dinamo Zagreb - Thun
    • The home team shows clear advantages in various aspects. In terms of offensive conversion rate, they achieve 18.2% throughout the field, outperforming the away team's 12.7%. The xG value of 1.32 against 0.89 indicates a more efficient offense. The value of forward passes is 1.73 compared to 1.21, posing a greater threat. The key pass success rate stands at 62%, leading the 54% of the opponent. In the midfield, they control 58% of the game and have a faster transition speed. Their total running distance is 112.4km, 3.6km more than the away team. The number of high - intensity sprints is 21, compared to 15 of the opponent, giving them an edge. On the defensive end, they are more active with 14 tackles against 9, 9.4 interceptions, and 6 clearances against 3. In offensive efficiency, the shooting accuracy rate is 41% against 28%, and the scoring chance conversion rate is 23% against 15%, reflecting a stronger finishing ability. The xG comparison of 1.32 - 0.89 further confirms the home te
      AH
      UEFA CL NK Publikum Celje - Egnatia
    • Hartz shows a clear edge over Graz in multiple aspects. In terms of offensive conversion rate, Hartz's 18.3% surpasses Graz's 14.1%. The xG value also indicates Hartz's superiority on the offensive end, with 1.28 compared to Graz's 0.91. Regarding key passing success rate, Hartz leads with 62%, while Graz only manages 55%. The value of forward passes, 14.7 for Hartz and 11.2 for Graz, reflects Hartz's control of the ball. In the midfield, Hartz outperforms Graz in interceptions, with 12 times compared to Graz's 8. Hartz also covers more ground, running 118km while Graz runs 112km. The high - intensity sprints are 17 for Hartz and 12 for Graz. On the defensive side, Hartz has 15 tackles and 21 clearances, while Graz has 9 interceptions and 14 clearances, showing a significant gap in the data. In terms of offensive efficiency, Hartz's scoring opportunity conversion rate of 27% is higher than Graz's 21%, and the xG comparison further validates the difference in offensive quality. The perf
      O/U
      UEFA CL Heart of Midlothian - Sturm Graz
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.