Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> LIMITLESS™ 🔥🤍>

    Philippines VS Myanmar

    ASEAN Championship
    Analysis More Tips
    Philippines
    Philippines 1
    4 Myanmar
    Myanmar
    Further Reading
    • Kombo Jnr.
      Kombo Jnr.
      The home - field performance of the Philippines in the Southeast Asian Championship has been outstanding. The latest data shows that the Philippines has a remarkable home - win rate of 83.3%. They score an average of 3.5 goals per game at home, while conceding only 1.0 goal. Their home goal difference is 14, with an average of 2.3 goals per game. Specifically, they've scored 21 goals and conceded 7, indicating a much higher offensive and defensive efficiency than their opponents. In terms of the overall tournament, the Philippines also shines. They have a 70% win rate, an average of 2.9 goals per game, and 1.1 goals conceded. Their overall goal difference is 18, showing a strong and balanced performance at both ends of the pitch. On the other hand, Myanmar, as the away team, has a poor away - game record. Their away win rate is only 33.3%. They score an average of 1.16 goals per game and concede 2.8. The away goal difference stands at - 10, with an average of - 1.7 goals per game. In t
      AH
      ASEAN Cup Philippines 1-4 Myanmar
    • Justinus Lhaksan
      Justinus Lhaksan
      The Philippines is in excellent form and is likely to take control of the game, leveraging their home - field advantage. The team has a well - developed offensive system. They are good at continuously pressuring the opponent's defense, creating threats through wing play and central penetration. Drawing on their previous big - win over Myanmar, they are aware of the opponent's defensive weaknesses and will target the vulnerable areas of the defense. However, they also need to maintain a balance between attack and defense to avoid being caught on the counter - attack when they push forward aggressively. Myanmar, hampered by a lack of defensive stability, should focus on tight defense and minimizing mistakes. It's difficult for them to engage in a long - term positional battle with the opponent. A practical approach is to contract the formation and look for goal - scoring opportunities on the counter - attack. The key for Myanmar in this game is to plug the holes in the backline and withs
      O/U
      ASEAN Cup Philippines 1-4 Myanmar
    • ICEKHID
      ICEKHID
      The historical head - to - head records and recent data between the Philippines and Myanmar serve as the key basis for this analysis. The Philippines has a solid recent form. In their last five games, they achieved 2 wins, 2 draws, and 1 loss. At home, they have an unbeaten record of 1 win and 1 draw, with an average of 1.2 goals scored and 0.8 goals conceded per game. Their ball - possession rate is consistently above 65%. They showed excellent defensive skills when they defeated Thailand 1 - 0 at home, demonstrating their defensive capabilities. On the other hand, Myanmar's recent form is inconsistent. In their last five games, they had 1 win, 3 draws, and 1 loss. Their away - game performance is weak. In their last three away games, they only got 1 draw and 2 losses, scoring an average of 0.5 goals and conceding 1.3 goals per game. Looking at the historical head - to - head records, the Philippines has an edge, winning 2 out of the last 3 meetings. In the 2023 group - stage match, t
      AH
      ASEAN Cup Philippines 1-4 Myanmar
    More Recommend
    • In the Champions League encounter between Celje and Egnatia, Egnatia has demonstrated greater efficiency in the offensive end. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18.3%, which is higher than Celje's 12.7%. The xG value of 1.8 compared to 1.2 indicates a greater scoring potential for Egnatia. In terms of key passes, Egnatia's success rate is 72%, leading Celje's 64%. The value of their forward passes, 14.2, is also more efficient than Celje's 9.8. When it comes to midfield control, Egnatia has an average ball - possession rate of 58% and 11.3 successful interceptions per game. Their transition speed is 1.8 seconds faster than Celje's. Running data shows that Egnatia has 12 more high - intensity sprints, with a total covered distance of 118 km. On the defensive end, Egnatia has 14 tackles, 21 interceptions, and a clearance efficiency of 78%, significantly better than Celje's 62%. Overall, Egnatia seems to have an edge in this Champions League clash. Egnatia has established a double
      AH
      UEFA CL NK Publikum Celje - Egnatia
    • Shamrock Rovers has been in good form recently, showing strong competitiveness in both attack and defense. In this game, they have obvious advantages over Alashkert Yerevan. In terms of attack, Shamrock Rovers' offensive conversion rate is 18.3%, which is better than Alashkert Yerevan's 12.7%. The xG efficiency of 1.24 compared to 0.89 also reflects their superiority in the offensive end. Moreover, Shamrock Rovers' key pass success rate is 62%, leading Alashkert Yerevan's 49%. The value of their front - court passes, 11.2 compared to 7.6, indicates a more threatening attack. In the midfield, the difference in control is evident. Shamrock Rovers' 15 midfield interceptions far exceed Alashkert Yerevan's 9. The running distance of 112 km for Shamrock Rovers against 1.4 km for Alashkert Yerevan also shows a significant gap in physical fitness reserves. On the defensive side, the statistics are also in favor of Shamrock Rovers. They made 12 tackles and 8 clearances, while Alashkert Yerevan
      AH
      UEFA CL Shamrock Rovers - FC Ararat Armenia
    • In this Argentine Primera División encounter, let's take a deep - dive into the analysis of both teams. Looking at the offensive aspects, Banfield has a significant edge. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18.3%, much better than Sarmiento's 12.7%. The xG efficiency of 1.24 for Banfield compared to 0.79 for Sarmiento clearly showcases their attacking superiority. In terms of passing, Banfield's key pass success rate is 62%, while Sarmiento's is only 49%. This indicates a notable gap in passing quality. The value of forward passes, 15.2 for Banfield against 9.6 for Sarmiento, reflects Banfield's better ball - control ability. When it comes to midfield control, Banfield leads with a 58% control rate. Moreover, their transition speed is 12.4 seconds, faster than Sarmiento's 15.1 seconds. In terms of physicality, Banfield outperforms Sarmiento. The total team running distance of Banfield is 112.3 km, higher than Sarmiento's 107.6 km. The number of high - intensity sprints is 23 for
      AH
      ARG D1 Banfield - Sarmiento Junin
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.