Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Side Eye NemoWon 4/4Follow84.6%Win Rate +62.2%ROI 14Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
2
Freeman55Won 9/10Follow84.6%Win Rate +47.8%ROI 13Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
3
VIAMOND💎Won 6/6Follow84.2%Win Rate +58.8%ROI 20Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
4
Boruto Otsutsuki ⭐⭐⭐🏳️🌈Follow80%Win Rate +44.1%ROI 10Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
5
Crypto BetManFollow75%Win Rate +30.4%ROI 23Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
6
ZacDFollow73.3%Win Rate +36.5%ROI 31Tips 1.91Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
JJ BEDDINGSSouth Melbourne shows remarkable superiority over Adelaide United in multiple aspects. In terms of offensive efficiency, South Melbourne's conversion rate of offensive finishes stands at 18.3%, significantly better than Adelaide United's 12.7%. The xG efficiency is 1.21 compared to 0.89. The value of front - field passes for South Melbourne is 1.73, much higher than 1.12 of their opponents. The success rate of key passes is 62% versus 48%. When it comes to the midfield performance, South Melbourne has a 58% ball - possession rate, leading the game. Their conversion speed is 1.8 times per minute, faster than Adelaide United's 1.2 times. In terms of physical exertion, the whole South Melbourne team runs 112.4 km and has 43 high - intensity sprints, both figures are higher than those of Adelaide United. Defensively, South Melbourne also has comprehensive advantages with 14 tackles, 11 interceptions and 9 clearances. On the offensive end, South Melbourne is more capable of seizing opportunAH
AUS CUP
South Melbourne
2-1 Adelaide United
-
vFxdiSouth Melbourne plays at home and is accustomed to using midfield passing combined with flank attacks to create offensive opportunities. The front - court players have a good understanding with each other, and they can continuously pose a threat to the opponent's goal at home. The team has a stable offensive end, but there are certain weaknesses in the defense. When the opponent launches a rapid vertical attack, the defenders may have problems in coordinated defense and filling positions, and there will be spaces behind them after a high - pressing strategy. Adelaide United has a well - developed tactical system. The midfielders have good running coverage, and the wingers are excellent at breaking through. They are good at seizing transition opportunities to advance forward, and the strikers are capable of capitalizing on chances. However, when playing away, their defense is not flawless. Facing the opponent's continuous flank attacks, the flank defense will be under considerable pressO/UAUS CUP
South Melbourne
2-1 Adelaide United
-
Iqbal ahmadSouth Melbourne shows a better attacking conversion rate of 18.2% compared to Adelaide United's 14.4%, and an xG efficiency of 0.78 against 0.59. The former team also leads in key pass success rate, with 62% against Adelaide United's 51%, and has a higher value of forward passes, 12.3 versus 9.7. In midfield control, South Melbourne averages 11.2 tackles, 8.4 interceptions, 6.3 clearances per game, runs a distance of 112.4 km, and makes 43 high - intensity sprints, all outperforming their opponents. Adelaide United's offensive efficiency is only 1.2 shots on target per 90 minutes, and their scoring chance conversion rate is 11.8%, lower than South Melbourne's 15.6%. The total xG of the two teams is 0.87 for South Melbourne and 0.66 for Adelaide United, indicating a significant gap in attack. On the defensive end, South Melbourne dominates in tackle and interception statistics. They have 33% more clearances than Adelaide United. There's a 10% difference in running distance and a 35% higO/UAUS CUP
South Melbourne
2-1 Adelaide United
AUS CUP
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post