Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Eng. Ahmad Al-OqaidiFollow91.7%Win Rate +65%ROI 12Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
2
GosugopFollow80%Win Rate +50.4%ROI 12Tips 1.97Avg Odds -
3
Colleen HensleyFollow76.2%Win Rate +48.8%ROI 26Tips 1.94Avg Odds -
4
LuksWon 14/19Follow72.7%Win Rate +34.3%ROI 23Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
5
KUNMI》💙《Won 3/4Follow72.7%Win Rate +31%ROI 11Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
5
MarkZWon 5/5Follow72.7%Win Rate +26.4%ROI 11Tips 1.84Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Afc Xylo MarqMinnesota United has been in great form recently, showing remarkable improvements in their offensive efficiency. Their conversion rate in the final third has climbed to 14.2%, which is notably higher than San Diego's 9.8%. In terms of key passing success rates, Minnesota United also holds an edge, with a 68.3% success rate compared to San Diego's 61.7%. The passing value index in the attacking third reveals that Minnesota United creates 3.1 high - value opportunities per 90 minutes, while San Diego manages only 2.4. When it comes to midfield control, Minnesota United dominates. They maintain an average ball possession rate of 56.4%. Moreover, their transition speed is a significant factor. They can move the ball at a speed of 4.2 meters per second, much faster than San Diego's 3.6 meters per second. All these aspects suggest that Minnesota United has a strong advantage in various aspects of the game. Minnesota United's home form in this season's MLS has been consistently poor. They'veAH
MLS
Minnesota United FC
1-1
San Diego FC
-
GideonJIlposMinnesota United has been in good form recently, showing strong offensive capabilities. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18.3%, higher than San Diego's 15.1%. However, San Diego has a slightly better xG value of 0.78 compared to Minnesota United's 0.72. In terms of key passing success rates, Minnesota United and San Diego have rates of 42% and 38% respectively. Minnesota United's forward - line passes hold more value. When it comes to midfield control, Minnesota United averages 12.4 tackles per game, while San Diego has 9.8 interceptions. In terms of physical performance, Minnesota United runs a total distance of 118.3 km and has 23 high - intensity sprints, outperforming San Diego. San Diego's offensive strategy relies heavily on wing crosses. Their shot - on - target rate is 24%, significantly higher than Minnesota United's 17%. On the other hand, Minnesota United has an impressive set - piece goal - scoring efficiency of 33%. Overall, both teams have their own strengths. MiO/UMLS
Minnesota United FC
1-1
San Diego FC
-
Runiverse IdleMinnesota United has shown significant weakness in their recent home performances. In their last five home games, they've only managed to score 3 goals, with an average of 0.6 goals per game. Meanwhile, they've conceded 5 goals, indicating prominent defensive flaws. Looking at the specific matches, they drew 0 - 0 with Vancouver Whitecaps, 1 - 1 with Real Salt Lake, lost 0 - 1 to Colorado Rapids, drew 2 - 2 with Austin FC, and lost 0 - 1 to Los Angeles FC. These results highlight the team's low offensive efficiency and lack of defensive stability at home. In terms of corner kicks, they average 5.5 per home game. However, in the last five matches, the corner - kick data were 5 - 2, 6 - 3, 5 - 5, 3 - 4, and 11 - 2 respectively. This shows that their conversion rate from set - pieces is not high. Minnesota United has been struggling at home this season in the MLS. In 8 home games, they've only managed 2 wins, 4 draws, and 2 losses, with a win - rate of 25.0% and 10 points, ranking 13th inO/UMLS
Minnesota United FC
1-1
San Diego FC
MLS
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post