Ulsan HD FC vs FC Anyang Tips and Predictions O/U Iqbal ahmad

K League 1

Analysis More Tips

Ulsan HD FC

FC Anyang

Further Reading

Wellington Oliveira

Currently, Ulsan Hyundai is sitting in the fourth position in the K League standings. With a record of 9 wins, 4 draws, and 7 losses in 20 games, they've scored 30 goals and conceded 29, resulting in a goal difference of +1 and 31 points in total. However, their home form has been a bit lackluster. In 10 home games, they've managed only 4 wins, 1 draw, and 5 losses. They've scored 15 goals and conceded 17, with a goal - difference of -2 and a win rate of just 40%. The defense has been leaky, conceding an average of 1.7 goals per game at home, which poses a major threat to their performance on home turf. On the other hand, FC Anyang is ranked fifth. They have a record of 7 wins, 9 draws, and 4 losses, scoring 28 goals and conceding 23, with a goal difference of +5 and 30 points. Their away - game performance is quite remarkable. In 10 away games, they've won 5, drawn 4, and lost only 1. They've scored 16 goals and conceded 10, with a goal difference of +6 and a win rate of 50%. Their de

O/U
KOR D1 Ulsan HD FC 3-1 FC Anyang
Oscar El Monix〽️🐐

Ulsan Hyundai's home performance in this season's K League 1 has fallen short of expectations. In 16 home games, they've only managed 4 wins, 4 draws, and 8 losses, with a win - rate of just 40%. The team scores an average of 1.25 goals per home game while conceding 1.5 goals. The negative goal difference of -1 indicates a serious imbalance between attack and defense. Concretely, they've scored 5 goals and conceded 6 at home, showing obvious flaws in the defense. The average of 0.8 yellow cards per game suggests that the defense tends to commit fouls under pressure, putting the team in a passive position on the pitch. This unstable home - defense situation means that Ulsan often struggles to keep a clean sheet when facing teams with strong offensive firepower. The pressure on the defense increases even more when up against teams with good away - game records. Although Ulsan averages 4.2 corner kicks per home game, showing some ball - control ability, their conversion rate in attack is

O/U
KOR D1 Ulsan HD FC 3-1 FC Anyang
Ingram⚪🔴

The current standings put these two teams in close competition, with one vying for the crucial AFC Champions League playoff spot. The stakes are incredibly high in this direct encounter. Ulsan Hyundai, currently sitting in the 4th position on the league table, has 31 points from 20 games, with 9 wins, 4 draws, and 7 losses. However, they've been in a slump lately, managing just one win in their last four league matches. To make matters worse, they suffered a shocking 0 - 1 defeat to K3 - level Ulsan Citizen in the mid - week Korean Cup. Adding to their woes, their offensive linchpin will be absent, which could significantly hamper their attacking capabilities. On the other hand, FC Anyang, ranked 5th, has 30 points from 20 games, with 7 wins, 9 draws, and 4 losses. They're in excellent form, having won three consecutive league matches and only losing one game in their last ten. Their historical record against Ulsan is also favorable, with 2 wins, 2 draws, and 1 loss in the last five me

O/U
KOR D1 Ulsan HD FC 3-1 FC Anyang

More Recommend

Ole Gunnar Solskjaer's team, Aalesund, has shown superior offensive efficiency compared to Tromsø. Aalesund's conversion rate of offensive finishes stands at 18.3%, outperforming Tromsø's 14.1%. The xG efficiency of Aalesund is 0.78, while Tromsø only manages 0.52. In terms of key passes, Aalesund has a success rate of 62%, leading Tromsø's 55%. The value of Aalesund's forward passes is 1.23, higher than Tromsø's 0.97. Aalesund also dominates in midfield ball - possession, with a rate of 61% against Tromsø's 39%. The conversion speed of Aalesund is on average 12.7 seconds, faster than Tromsø's 15.3 seconds. In terms of physical performance, Aalesund runs 118.3 km in the whole game and has 42 high - intensity sprints, while Tromsø runs 109.8 km and has 31 high - intensity sprints. I have a professional team and provide in - depth analysis of carefully selected football matches every day. Tromsø had 15 tackles, 12 interceptions, and 9 clearances, while Ålesund had 12, 9, and 6

O/U
NOR D1 Aalesund FK - Tromso IL
In comparing the offensive efficiencies of Brann and Rosenborg, Rosenborg has an edge. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 12.3%, better than Brann's 9.8%. Although both teams have relatively low xG efficiencies, Rosenborg's 0.78 xG per game gives them a slight lead. Looking at the passing statistics, Rosenborg's key - pass success rate of 41% outperforms Brann's 35%. The value of their forward - field passes is 1.23 compared to Brann's 0.91, indicating a more threatening attack. When it comes to midfield control, Rosenborg holds the upper hand with an average ball - possession rate of 58% and a transition speed of 1.8 times per minute. In terms of physical exertion, Brann runs more, with a total distance of 112 km and 52 high - intensity sprints, compared to Rosenborg's 108 km and 45 sprints. On the defensive end, Brann is also more active, recording 14 tackles and 21 interceptions. I have a professional team and can provide in - depth analysis of selected matches every day. Ros

O/U
NOR D1 Brann - Rosenborg BK
Mexico's Club América shows a better offensive performance compared to Santos Laguna. América's offensive conversion rate is 18.2%, higher than Santos Laguna's 14.4%, and its xG efficiency stands at 0.78 against 0.59. In terms of key passes, América has a success rate of 62%, leading Santos Laguna's 55%. The value of its forward passes is 12.3, more efficient than 9.8. In midfield control, América holds a 58% possession rate and a transition speed of 6.2 times per 90 minutes. The whole team's average running distance is 11.3 km, with 42 high - intensity sprints, both figures surpassing the opponent. On the defensive end, América has 14 tackles, 9 interceptions, and 6 clearances, comprehensively outperforming Santos Laguna. In the offensive end, América is more capable of seizing opportunities. Its shooting accuracy is 28% compared to 19% of Santos Laguna, and the corner - kick conversion rate is 12%, double that of 6% of the opponent. The cumulative xG is 1.35 for América and 0.

O/U
MEX D1 Club America - Santos Laguna

0 Comments

All

By Author

Add Comment

Post

Ulsan HD FC VS FC Anyang