Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Eng. Ahmad Al-OqaidiWon 4/4Follow85.7%Win Rate +51.8%ROI 15Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
2
AbuleWon 6/6Follow77.8%Win Rate +28.9%ROI 18Tips 1.66Avg Odds -
3
ijuyunFollow77.8%Win Rate +52%ROI 11Tips 1.94Avg Odds -
4
LuksWon 4/4Follow76.2%Win Rate +39.9%ROI 22Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
5
えめるいFollow75%Win Rate +25.3%ROI 20Tips 1.86Avg Odds -
6
MarkZWon 6/6Follow75%Win Rate +32.4%ROI 12Tips 1.86Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Kombo Jnr.Brann has demonstrated a significant home - field advantage in their historical encounters with Rosenborg at home. Looking back at the last five meetings, Brann has achieved three wins, two draws, and one loss in their home games. Specific results include a 3 - 0 thrashing at home, a 3 - 1 victory, and a 2 - 2 draw. Brann's offensive efficiency at home is remarkable. In the last three home games, they have scored 8 goals while conceding only 3, with an average of 2.67 goals per game. They kept a clean sheet in one game and conceded only one goal in another, showing a solid defensive performance. The corner - kick data further validates Brann's tactical execution. In several home games, they had a significant lead in corner kicks, such as 10 - 2, 8 - 2, and 11 - 5. This reflects their dominance in ball - possession and positional attacks. Given these factors, Brann's home - field performance in future matches against Rosenborg is worth looking forward to. Rosenborg has been in poor formAH
NOR D1
Brann
3-2 Rosenborg BK
-
Iqbal ahmadIn comparing the offensive efficiencies of Brann and Rosenborg, Rosenborg has an edge. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 12.3%, better than Brann's 9.8%. Although both teams have relatively low xG efficiencies, Rosenborg's 0.78 xG per game gives them a slight lead. Looking at the passing statistics, Rosenborg's key - pass success rate of 41% outperforms Brann's 35%. The value of their forward - field passes is 1.23 compared to Brann's 0.91, indicating a more threatening attack. When it comes to midfield control, Rosenborg holds the upper hand with an average ball - possession rate of 58% and a transition speed of 1.8 times per minute. In terms of physical exertion, Brann runs more, with a total distance of 112 km and 52 high - intensity sprints, compared to Rosenborg's 108 km and 45 sprints. On the defensive end, Brann is also more active, recording 14 tackles and 21 interceptions. I have a professional team and can provide in - depth analysis of selected matches every day. RosO/UNOR D1
Brann
3-2 Rosenborg BK
-
Sports GazaBrann has shown a remarkable performance in recent matches, achieving an excellent record in six games with an increasing undefeated rate. However, their form has been inconsistent lately, with a poor defensive display. They concede more goals per game than they score, indicating a lack of defensive solidity. Despite the recent slump, Brann has maintained an unbeaten streak in several games. Compared to their opponents Rosenborg B, Brann, a mid - table team, doesn't have a significant gap in overall strength, but they have a better recent form. On the other hand, Rosenborg B has had a rather mediocre performance, with inconsistent results. They have struggled to maintain a stable level of play. In this encounter, Brann, full of fighting spirit, seems to have a stronger overall strength than Rosenborg B. It remains to be seen what the final outcome of this match will be. Both teams have strong offensive capabilities and high motivation as every game is crucial for their recent records.O/UNOR D1
Brann
3-2 Rosenborg BK
NOR D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post