FC Krasnodar vs Terek Grozny Tips and Predictions O/U Max Statman

Russia Cup

Analysis More Tips

FC Krasnodar

Terek Grozny

Further Reading

Iqbal ahmad

I've analyzed the performance of Krasnodar and Grozny Terek. In terms of offensive conversion, Krasnodar's rate of 18.3% outshines Grozny Terek's 14.1%. The xG efficiency, 0.78 to 0.52, also reflects Krasnodar's offensive superiority. Krasnodar leads in key passing success rate, with 62% compared to Grozny Terek's 49%. The value of their forward passes is higher, 12.4 to 9.7. In the midfield, Krasnodar shows better control. They've made 14 interceptions compared to 9 by Grozny Terek, and 9 tackles against 6. Their ball - possession rate of 58% to 42% is a clear sign of dominance. As for physical performance, the average running distance of Krasnodar players is 11.3 km, and they've made 42 high - intensity sprints, more than the 35 of their opponents. On the defensive end, the statistics are also in Krasnodar's favor. The clearance ratio is 11:7, interceptions are 14:9, and they've blocked 9.4 offensive finishes. In conclusion, Krasnodar has comprehensive advantages in various data aspe

O/U
RUS Cup FC Krasnodar - Terek Grozny
mayoritas

Krasnodar has been in good form recently, showing stability in several recent games. In contrast, Grozny Terek's performance has been mediocre and there is a certain gap compared to the home team. Grozny Terek lacks good wingers, which limits their offensive options on the flanks. Their main threat comes from central penetration, but they don't have a super - powerful striker. As a result, their scoring ability is relatively weak. Based on the comparison of the two teams' strength, Krasnodar clearly holds an advantage. When these two teams face off, it remains to be seen which team will claim the victory. Krasnodar has been in good form recently. In their recent matches, they've performed steadily and shown a high - level of stability. On the other hand, Grozny Terek's current form is mediocre. There is a certain gap between them and the home team. The away team lacks good wingers. Their main threat in attack comes from the middle - field penetration. Moreover, they don't have a super

AH
RUS Cup FC Krasnodar - Terek Grozny
BET ENSURED Won 6/9

FC Krasnodar Stats In the last games, FC Krasnodar has shown diverse performance statistics. They have a win rate of 50%, while their draw rate stands at 40%. On the other hand, they lost 10% of the games. Interesting aspects include a 40% rate of winning with over 1.5 goals scored and a 10% rate of losing while conceding over 1.5 goals. On average, FC Krasnodar scores 2 goals per game and concedes 1 goals per game. Their clean sheet rate is 30% of the games, and the team scored in 90% of the games. Goals were scored in both halves in 40% of the games, and both teams scored (BTTS) in 70% of the matches. The combination of winning and BTTS occurred in 30% of the games, while a draw with BTTS was seen in 30%, and losing with BTTS in 10%. The match total goals were 0 goals in 10% of the games, 1 goal in 10% of the games, 2 goals in 20% of the games, 3 goals in 20% of the games, and 4 or more goals in 40% of the games. Akhmat Stats In their recent games, Akhmat has demonstrated varied perf

1x2
RUS Cup FC Krasnodar - Terek Grozny

More Recommend

Looking at the historical head - to - head records between these two teams, in a previous match in the Finnish Second Division, Westersaari played to a 2 - 2 draw with Saepae at home. The score was 1 - 1 at half - time, and the corner kick ratio was 4 - 2. Going further back, in the Finnish First Division in 2023, Saepae hosted Westersaari to a 2 - 2 draw with a corner kick ratio of 5 - 8 on September 16. On July 15, Westersaari lost 0 - 1 at home to Saepae, with a corner kick ratio of 5 - 7. And on May 6, Saepae thrashed Westersaari 3 - 0 at home, with a corner kick ratio of 5 - 7. The data shows that when Saepae plays at home against Westersaari, they have achieved a big 3 - 0 win but also had a 2 - 2 draw. Westersaari, on the other hand, has suffered a 0 - 1 loss at home but managed to draw in the most recent encounter. This indicates that the two teams are in a closely - contested situation. In terms of offensive and defensive data, when Saepae plays at home, Vaasan Palloseura has

AH
FIN D3 A SalPa - Jyvaskyla JK
Moscow Spartak has been showing strong offensive and defensive performances at home recently. In a home game, they thrashed Rodina Moscow 3 - 0, with a corner - kick ratio of 12 - 4, which clearly demonstrated their ball - control and offensive - organization abilities. In another home match, they defeated Wings of Soviets 3 - 2, and the corner - kick data of 10 - 0 was a crushing proof of their dominance on the flanks. However, their away - game form has been rather inconsistent. They lost 1 - 2 to Grozny Terek. After a 1 - 1 draw at half - time, the 1 - 5 corner - kick deficit exposed problems in their defensive organization. In an away game against Makhachkala, they played a 0 - 0 draw, and the slightly inferior corner - kick data of 3 - 4 indicated a lack of defensive resilience on the road. In recent friendlies, at home, they played a 0 - 0 draw against Rubin Kazan, leading 7 - 2 in corner kicks. Although they failed to score, they showed strong control in the offensive end. They

AH
RUS Cup Spartak Moscow - Gazovik Orenburg
Voronеж Torpedo's recent home performances have shown an imbalance between attack and defense. In a home game, they lost 1-2 to Makhachkala. Although they were level 1-1 at half-time and had 8-2 corner kicks, indicating strong offensive firepower, their defense had obvious loopholes. In another match, they defeated Yenisey 2-0 at home with 5-1 corner kicks, showing high offensive and defensive efficiency. However, they drew 2-2 with Shinnik at home, having 5-4 corner kicks, which revealed a lack of defensive stability. In friendly matches, they beat Rostov 3-1 with 3-3 corner kicks, demonstrating offensive vitality. But in an away game, they lost 0-2 to Rostov with 0-0 corner kicks, showing a weak away form. Their away statistics are even more concerning. They lost 0-3 to Krasnodar with 2-4 corner kicks. In their last three away games, they had only 1 win, 1 draw, and 1 loss, with an average of only 3.0 corner kicks per game, facing continuous defensive pressure. The team's corner -

AH
RUS Cup Fakel - Dynamo Moscow

0 Comments

All

By Author

Add Comment

Post

FC Krasnodar VS Terek Grozny