Chelsea vs Juventus Tips and Predictions O/U JJ BEDDINGS

International Club Friendly

Analysis More Tips

Chelsea

Juventus

Further Reading

Garoux 777

Juventus has been struggling at home recently, with a home - game winning rate of just 33.3%. Their home record stands at 2 wins, 0 draws, and 4 losses. They average 0.83 goals per game and concede 1.33 goals, indicating clear defensive flaws. Looking at Chelsea's overall game statistics, their overall winning rate is 30%. They score 1.3 goals per game on average but concede 1.8 goals, with a goal difference of -0.5. This shows that while their offensive efficiency is decent, their defensive stability is lacking. On the other hand, Juventus has shown strong form as the away team. Their away record is 3 wins, 3 draws, and 0 losses, resulting in a high winning rate of 50%. They average 0.83 goals per game and concede only 0.33 goals, being highly efficient in both attack and defense. In terms of overall data, Juventus has a 50% winning rate, averaging 1 goal and conceding 0.5 goals per game, with a goal difference of +0.5. Clearly, Juventus has a much better balance between offense and d

O/U
INT CF Chelsea 0-1 Juventus
Andie Peci

Chelsea has been in excellent form recently, especially in attack. Their offensive end shows a higher offensive conversion rate (18.7% vs 13.2%) and expected goals efficiency (xG/shot 0.142 vs 0.111), which indicates that their offensive finishing quality is superior. The key pass success rate of Chelsea is as high as 82.3%, and the passing value index in the front field leads by 19%. This shows that their organization in the final third is more precise. In terms of midfield control, Chelsea completes 3.1 effective transitions per minute on average, 12% faster than Juventus. Moreover, the frequency of short - pass penetration when in possession is 27% higher, forming an efficient offensive rhythm. As for the running data, it's hard to predict how it will influence the game. It's a factor that could potentially turn the tables. I invite you to follow me for more match predictions. Chelsea has shown a remarkable defensive performance in recent matches. In a previous encounter, they compl

AH
INT CF Chelsea 0-1 Juventus
Diego 10

Chelsea's offensive and defensive efficiency has shown significant fluctuations in preseason friendlies. In a match against Tottenham Hotspur, Chelsea lost 1-2 at home. They only got one corner kick and failed to put effective pressure on the offensive end. After a 1-1 draw at half - time, they couldn't expand their lead, revealing problems with offensive efficiency. Before that, in an away game against Western Sydney Wanderers, Chelsea lost 4 - 6. Although they had a slight edge in corner kicks (8 - 7), they conceded six goals, indicating issues with defensive stability. Looking back at the latter stage of last season's Premier League, Chelsea won 2 - 1 against Tottenham Hotspur at home. However, they lost 1 - 3 to Nottingham Forest at home and conceded three goals. In the FA Cup, they lost 0 - 1 to Manchester City at home, with a 4 - 4 tie in corner kicks and lackluster offense. Based on comprehensive data, Chelsea has averaged 1.4 goals scored and 1.6 goals conceded in recent games.

AH
INT CF Chelsea 0-1 Juventus

More Recommend

Moscow Spartak has shown a clear edge in various aspects compared to Orenburg Gazovik. In terms of offensive efficiency, Moscow Spartak's conversion rate of offensive opportunities stands at 18.2%, significantly better than Orenburg Gazovik's 12.7%. The xG efficiency of 0.78 to 0.45 further demonstrates Moscow Spartak's offensive dominance. The home - team, Moscow Spartak, also leads in passing. The success rate of key passes is 62%, while Orenburg Gazovik only manages 45%. The value of forward passes is 1.32 for Moscow Spartak compared to 0.89 for Orenburg Gazovik, indicating a more threatening attacking approach. In midfield, Moscow Spartak has a 58% ball - possession rate, leaving Orenburg Gazovik with only 42%. The number of fast transitions is 14 for Moscow Spartak and 8 for Orenburg Gazovik, showing an advantage in game rhythm. Regarding physical performance, the total running distance of Moscow Spartak is 112.3 km, higher than Orenburg Gazovik's 98.6 km. The number of high - int

AH
RUS Cup Spartak Moscow - Gazovik Orenburg
Zenit St. Petersburg has an 18.3% conversion rate in full - field offensive finishes, lower than Batka's 24.1%. However, the xG efficiency values show that Zenit is more efficient, with a 1.21 to Batka's 0.89. In terms of passing, Batka has a better key - passing success rate of 67% compared to Zenit's 59%. Also, Batka has a higher value in front - court passes, with 1.83 against Zenit's 1.42. Zenit dominates in midfield ball - possession, holding 58%. But their conversion speed is only 1.2 times per minute, slower than Batka's 1.4 times. Regarding physical performance, Zenit runs a slightly longer full - field distance, 112.3 km compared to Batka's 109.8 km. Yet, Batka has more high - intensity sprints, 15 to Zenit's 12, indicating better physical fitness. I'm good at selecting matches daily with unique issues and rare data. Baltika shows a more aggressive defensive performance, with 14 tackles, 9 interceptions, and 6 clearances, compared to Zenit's 11, 7, and 4 respectively. In terms

AH
RUS Cup Zenit St. Petersburg - Baltika Kaliningrad
Ferencváros shows a significant edge in various aspects of the game. In terms of offensive conversion, their rate is 12% higher than the away team, with an xG value of 1.8, compared to the opponent's 1.2. Their passing in the front - field is also more valuable, leading by 23%. The success rate of key passes stands at 78%, outperforming the opponent's 65%. In the midfield, Ferencváros has 5 more interceptions and a 15% faster transition speed. The whole team runs a total distance of 112 km and the frequency of high - intensity sprints is 40% higher. On the defensive end, they make 18 tackles and have a clearance efficiency of 82%, which is much better than the opponent's 70%. In attack, they have a stronger ability to seize opportunities, with a difference of +0.6 between actual goals and xG. Overall, Ferencváros seems to be in a very good position in this game, showing comprehensive superiority over their opponents. Ferenecváros has been in excellent form recently, showing high ef

AH
UEFA EL Ferencvarosi TC - Gornik Zabrze

0 Comments

All

By Author

Add Comment

Post

Chelsea VS Juventus