Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
TopnotchFollow84.6%Win Rate +26.8%ROI 13Tips 1.50Avg Odds -
2
Bryon PrinceFollow76.5%Win Rate +43.1%ROI 18Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
3
Kon kha laFollow75%Win Rate +47%ROI 12Tips 1.97Avg Odds -
4
HisyampanjiFollow73.9%Win Rate +30.5%ROI 23Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
5
mata jalyWon 11/13Follow72.7%Win Rate +16.6%ROI 22Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
6
Queen_SikabaFollow72.7%Win Rate +14.1%ROI 11Tips 1.83Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Kombo Jnr.Thun's recent performance in matches has been quite volatile. Their win rate stands at only 20%, while the proportion of losses is 40%. The imbalance between attack and defense efficiency is particularly prominent. Statistics show that the team scores an average of 1.8 goals per game but concedes as many as 2.6. The negative goal difference of -0.8 highlights the persistent problems in their defense. Frequent gaps in the back - line make it difficult for them to maintain a lead in crucial games. An average of 2 yellow cards per game also indicates an overly high intensity of confrontation. Thun's ability to create corner - kicks is relatively weak, with an average of 4.2 corner - kicks per game, far lower than the league average. This lack of variety in offensive threats is a concern. The fact that draws account for 40% of their results shows that the team struggles to break the deadlock through efficient attacks against mid - level opponents. On the other hand, Vikingur has shown a moAH
UEFA EL
Thun
3-0 Vikingur Reykjavik
-
Iqbal ahmadThun holds an edge in offensive finishing conversion rate (18.3% vs 14.7%) and xG efficiency (1.24 vs 0.98). Their forward - passing value (1.72 vs 1.35) is also more efficient. Vikingur has a slight advantage in the key - pass success rate (62% vs 55%). However, Thun outperforms in midfield interceptions (14 times vs 9 times) and high - intensity sprints (11 times vs 7 times). The running distances of the two teams are quite close (112km vs 110km). But Thun's average of 12 successful tackles per game shows stronger defensive tenacity. I have a professional team and can provide in - depth analysis of carefully selected football matches every day. In this Europa Cup encounter, a detailed analysis of the two teams' performance reveals interesting insights. Vikingur RKVÍK shows greater offensive threat, with a higher conversion rate of scoring opportunities (29% vs 21%) and a better xG (1.12 vs 0.89). However, Thun has the upper - hand in the defensive department, boasting more clearanceAHUEFA EL
Thun
3-0 Vikingur Reykjavik
-
LACOBRAAAThun shows a significant disparity in home and away performances in the Swiss Super League. This season, they've had only one home game, ending up winless with a 0-1 defeat, conceding six goals and having a goal difference of -6. Their defense at home is full of holes, ranking last among home - standing teams. On the contrary, in their one away game, they achieved a complete victory, scoring three goals and conceding only one, showing high - efficiency in both attack and defense with a 100% win - rate. This extreme contrast between home and away games indicates that Thun has stability issues in their defensive system when playing at home, leading to excessive goals conceded. However, they can execute their tactics effectively on the road. In total, Thun has played two games, with a record of one win and one loss, a win - rate of 50%. In the last six games, they've won two, drawn one, and lost one, scoring three goals and conceding seven, with a goal difference of -4 and a win - rate ofAHUEFA EL
Thun
3-0 Vikingur Reykjavik
UEFA EL
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post