Start Kristiansand vs Fredrikstad Tips and Predictions AH The Chelsea Verdict

Norway Eliteserien

Analysis More Tips

Start Kristiansand

Fredrikstad

Further Reading

Kombo Jnr.

Stålkameratene has been struggling at home in this season's Eliteserien. In 7 home games out of 16 league matches, they've only managed 1 win, 3 draws, and 3 losses, with a win - rate of just 14.3%. They've scored 6 goals and conceded 13, resulting in a goal difference of -7. Their attacking efficiency is low, and there are obvious defensive flaws. Overall, the team has 2 wins, 4 draws, and 10 losses, with 10 points, currently sitting at the bottom of the league table. The total goal ratio is 16:37, and the goal difference is -21, indicating a serious imbalance in attack and defense. In the last 6 rounds, Stålkameratene had 2 wins and 4 losses, scoring only 6 goals and conceding 11. They average less than 1 goal per game, and on the defensive end, they concede 1.83 goals per game. When playing at home, the lack of offensive power and unstable defense have created a vicious cycle, making it difficult to generate effective attacks at home. On the other hand, Fredrikstad is currently ra

AH
NOR D1 Start Kristiansand - Fredrikstad
Analysis VIP99

Match Overview & Form Analysis IK Start host Fredrikstad FK at Sør Arena (Sparebanken Norge Arena) in Kristiansand for Round 17 of the Eliteserien season. • IK Start: Start have struggled for consistency in their return to top-flight action, losing 4 of their last 5 league matches—including back-to-back 0–3 home defeats against Viking FK and Rosenborg. Defensive vulnerabilities remain a major concern, as they average over 2 goals conceded per game across their recent stretch. • Fredrikstad FK: Fredrikstad enter the fixture following a 1–0 home victory over Sandefjord. While their overall scoring output has been modest, their organized defensive block makes them difficult to break down, particularly against teams struggling for creative fluidity. Head-to-Head (H2H) Record Fredrikstad hold a strong advantage in recent meetings against IK Start: • May 2026 (Eliteserien): Fredrikstad 2 – 1 IK Start • Jun 2023 (1st Division): Fredrikstad 3 – 1 IK Start • Sep 2023 (1st D

AH
NOR D1 Start Kristiansand - Fredrikstad
RhysPundit

Stålkameratene's home form this season has been far from impressive. They've managed just 2 wins, 2 draws, and 6 losses at home, translating to a mere 20% win rate. Their offensive output has been dismal, scoring only 4 goals while conceding 11, resulting in a -7 goal difference. With an average of 0.8 goals per game, their attack lacks the cutting - edge needed to turn the tide. On the defensive side, they're conceding 1.8 goals per game at home and picking up an average of 1.8 yellow cards. This indicates that their defense is prone to making mistakes under pressure. The 3.2 average corner kicks per game suggest they have some ball - possession ability, but their conversion rate is extremely low. Looking at their overall league performance, Stålkameratene have a 20% win rate, 10% draw rate, and a staggering 70% loss rate. They're averaging 1.1 goals and 2.6 goals conceded per game, clearly showing an imbalance between attack and defense. As for Fredrikstad, their away form is even

O/U
NOR D1 Start Kristiansand - Fredrikstad

More Recommend

In this EFL Cup encounter, a detailed comparison between Cheltenham and Charlton reveals interesting insights. Cheltenham has a better offensive conversion rate of 18% compared to Charlton's 12%. However, Charlton has a slightly higher xG value of 0.95. In terms of passing, Charlton leads with a key - pass success rate of 62% and a higher front - field passing value of 1.35, while Cheltenham's is 0.98. Defensively, Cheltenham has 14 midfield interceptions, and Charlton has 11 tackles. But Charlton's average of 12 high - intensity sprints per game gives it an edge. Although Cheltenham covers 112 km in a game and Charlton 108 km, Charlton's 6 clearances show greater efficiency. Charlton also boasts a higher offensive efficiency of 82% compared to Cheltenham's 74%. Yet, both teams have a lower conversion rate of scoring opportunities than expected. Their xG values are 0.82 for Cheltenham and 0.88 for Charlton, but both teams' actual goals are below these expected values. I can provide you

O/U
ENG LC Cheltenham Town - Charlton Athletic
In this Swiss Super League encounter, a detailed analysis of the two teams' performance reveals significant differences. Let's start with the offensive end. The conversion rate of Servette's attacks is 18%, which is lower than Grasshopper Club's 24%. The xG efficiency, 0.74 for Servette and 1.12 for Grasshopper Club, clearly shows the gap in their attacking capabilities. In terms of passing, Grasshopper Club has a key - pass success rate of 62%, notably higher than Servette's 49%. The value of forward - field passes, 1.87 for Grasshopper Club compared to 1.33 for Servette, reflects the former's organizational advantage. When it comes to midfield control, Grasshopper Club averages 9.2 tackles per game, while Servette only manages 6.4. This gives Grasshopper Club a 12% boost in transition speed. In terms of physical performance, Grasshopper Club runs 118 km per game, 1.4 km more than Servette. The number of high - intensity sprints, 23 for Grasshopper Club and 15 for Servette, highlights

AH
SUI SL Servette - Grasshopper
In this Brazilian Serie A encounter, let's take a detailed look at the comparison between Grêmio and São Paulo. From an offensive perspective, Grêmio has an edge. Their full - field offensive conversion rate stands at 22%, significantly better than São Paulo's 15%. The xG efficiency of Grêmio is 0.82, while São Paulo's is only 0.59. In terms of key passes, Grêmio's success rate is 68%, compared to 54% of São Paulo. And the value of their forward passes is 12.3, much more efficient than São Paulo's 8.7. In the midfield, Grêmio has a 58% ball - possession rate, leading the game. Their transition speed is also faster, averaging 1.2 seconds per turn, while São Paulo takes 1.6 seconds. When it comes to physical performance, Grêmio runs a total of 112 km, 3 km more than São Paulo. The number of high - intensity sprints is 18 for Grêmio and 12 for São Paulo. On the defensive end, Grêmio's performance is outstanding. They have 14 tackles, 9 interceptions, and 7 clearances, all

AH
BRA D1 Gremio (RS) - Sao Paulo

0 Comments

All

By Author

Add Comment

Post

Start Kristiansand VS Fredrikstad