Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
AfsiezFollow86.7%Win Rate +57.4%ROI 17Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
2
TopnotchFollow82.4%Win Rate +23.8%ROI 17Tips 1.50Avg Odds -
3
ConstanceWon 8/8Follow78.6%Win Rate +17%ROI 14Tips 1.58Avg Odds -
4
AbuleWon 9/9Follow75%Win Rate +14.9%ROI 24Tips 1.59Avg Odds -
5
Garoux 777Follow75%Win Rate +32.2%ROI 17Tips 1.84Avg Odds -
6
Philosopher TipsWon 7/8Follow75%Win Rate +26.6%ROI 12Tips 1.67Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Orlando Rodas DíazQueen's Park Rangers has been in good form recently. In their last 10 matches, they've won 5, drawn 1, and lost 4. They played well in recent games and won their last match. Currently, they're in a mid - table position in the league standings. On the other hand, Millwall's form has been mediocre. In their last 10 games, they've won 3, drawn 3, and lost 4. They've only managed one win in their last four games. Their performance is quite different from that of Queen's Park Rangers. They seem to have been affected by the opposing team's momentum, and their overall defensive ability is rather poor. Now, Queen's Park Rangers will play at home against Millwall, who has a decent record in head - to - head encounters. Given Queen's Park Rangers' recent good performance and the home - field advantage, can they continue their winning streak in this game? The recent form of Queen's Park Rangers has been quite impressive. In their last 10 games, they've won 5, drawn 1, and lost 4. Meanwhile, MillwAH
ENG LC
Queens Park Rangers (QPR)
1-1 Millwall
-
Mr WellIn the EFL Cup encounter between Queen's Park Rangers and Millwall, a comparison between the initial and real - time data reveals significant differences in the offensive efficiency of the two teams. The home team, Queen's Park Rangers, has an 18% offensive conversion rate, which is better than Millwall's 12%. However, Millwall has a slightly higher xG value of 0.95 compared to the home team's 0.82. In terms of passing data, Millwall shines. The away team's key passing success rate is 62%, significantly leading Queen's Park Rangers' 45%. Millwall's forward passes reach 11.3 times per 90 minutes, while the home team only manages 7.2 times. When it comes to midfield control, Millwall has an edge. They average 14 tackles and 9 interceptions per game, 30% more than the home team. In addition, the running data shows that Millwall has 42 high - intensity sprints, 15 more than Queen's Park Rangers, indicating a clear physical fitness advantage. I've been analyzing football matches for a longAHENG LC
Queens Park Rangers (QPR)
1-1 Millwall
-
u cant ansI've conducted in - depth research on this match. In this encounter, Queen's Park Rangers has shown better attacking efficiency recently. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18.2%, higher than Millwall's 14.4%. Also, their xG efficiency is 1.32, which outperforms Millwall's 0.98. In terms of passing, the home - team, Queen's Park Rangers, has a better key - passing success rate of 67%, compared to Millwall's 52%. The value of their forward passes is 3.8, while Millwall only manages 2.6. When it comes to midfield control, Queen's Park Rangers averages 12.3 tackles per game. Although their transition speed of 1.8 seconds per transition is a bit slower than Millwall's 1.4 seconds per transition, the overall performance in the midfield is still remarkable. The whole team runs an average of 11.2 kilometers, and the number of high - intensity sprints is 14 times, 3 more than Millwall. Based on these aspects, Queen's Park Rangers seems to have an edge in this match. Milwall has a signifAHENG LC
Queens Park Rangers (QPR)
1-1 Millwall
ENG LC
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post