Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Pi314>

    Polissya Zhytomyr VS Metalist 1925 Kharkiv

    Ukrainian Premier League
    Analysis More Tips
    Polissya Zhytomyr
    Polissya Zhytomyr 3
    1 Metalist 1925 Kharkiv
    Metalist 1925 Kharkiv
    Further Reading
    • FAYALORRRD
      FAYALORRRD
      Prykarpattya had an impressive performance in the Ukrainian Premier League last season. In 30 rounds, they achieved 18 wins, 5 draws, and 7 losses, scoring 51 goals and conceding only 21. They ranked third in the league with 59 points. In the first round of the new season, the team continued their good form, winning 2 - 1 away against Chornomorets to start the season with a victory. In their last 10 matches across all competitions, they've had 6 wins, 2 draws, and 2 losses, showing a rather stable trend. In head - to - head encounters, Prykarpattya holds a significant psychological edge over Metalist 1925. In the past six meetings, they remained unbeaten with 2 wins and 4 draws. In the last three meetings, they had 1 win and 2 draws, scoring 4 goals and conceding 3. As for the Uruguayan Reserve League, Montevideo Wanderers Reserve will face Albion Reserve, Juventud de La Costa Reserve will play against Defensor Sporting Reserve, and Nacional Reserve will take on Rampla Juniors Reserve.
      AH
      UKR D1 Polissya Zhytomyr 3-1 Metalist 1925 Kharkiv
    • Ethan Blackaby
      Ethan Blackaby
      Plesija has only completed one round of the new - season league, earning a draw and 1 point away from home. Currently, they sit in the 5th position in the league standings. In the first - round game, the team scored 1 goal and had their own goal breached, showing performance at both ends of the pitch. The attack has successfully opened their goal - scoring account, but there are also obvious flaws in the defense. As they haven't played a home game yet, this will be their season's first home fixture. Their home - game form remains untested, and there are uncertainties regarding the home - ground offensive and defensive rhythm as well as the players' adaptation level. Their only league experience is from the away game. On the road, they can create scoring opportunities, but their defensive stability needs improvement. Based on the first - round performance, the team has some offensive creativity, but their ability to withstand defensive pressure remains to be seen. For this home debut, P
      O/U
      UKR D1 Polissya Zhytomyr 3-1 Metalist 1925 Kharkiv
    • The Chelsea Verdict
      The Chelsea Verdict
      In terms of the current form of the teams, the offensive efficiency of Prykarpattia has been quite poor. In their last five matches, their offensive conversion rate was only 6.2%, and the expected goals per game (xG) were less than 0.8. This clearly indicates a significant shortage in their front - end finishing abilities. On the other hand, Metalist 1.24 holds a distinct edge. They have an offensive conversion rate of 12.4% and an xG of 1.3 per game. Their key passing success rate is as high as 81%, and the value of their front - field passes is 37% higher than that of their opponents. In terms of midfield control, Metalist 1.24 has an average ball - possession rate of 58% and a short - pass success rate of 92%. Their speed in counter - attacking transitions is 18% faster. Looking at the running statistics, Metalist 1.24 has 112 high - intensity sprints per game, 29% more than their opponents. This shows that they cover a wider area on the pitch and have better physical energy distrib
      O/U
      UKR D1 Polissya Zhytomyr 3-1 Metalist 1925 Kharkiv
    More Recommend
    • Both Kapadie and LNZ Cherkasy have shown an active performance on the offensive end recently. Their offensive conversion rates stand at 14.2% and 16.8% respectively, both higher than the league average. In terms of key pass success rate, LNZ leads with 78.3%, and the value of its front - field passes is 23% higher. In midfield control, LNZ has an average ball possession rate of 56.4%, a short - pass success rate of 89.1%, and a fast - counterattack speed of 12.7m/s, which is significantly faster than its opponent. Looking at the running data, LNZ has 156 high - intensity sprints throughout the game and covers a distance of 118.4 kilometers, far exceeding Kapadie's 132 sprints and 112.1 kilometers. LNZ clearly has an advantage in terms of physical fitness and pressing rhythm. I invite you to follow me and join the core group! LNZ has been in excellent defensive form recently. They average 8.9 tackles, 6.3 interceptions, and 11.7 clearances per game. These three defensive statistics ou
      O/U
      UKR D1 FC Karpaty Lviv - LNZ Cherkasy
    • Mura has been struggling in their recent offensive performance. In their last five matches, their average offensive conversion rate is only 6.2%, and their expected goals efficiency is 18% lower than the league average. Their attack often relies on individual players' solo efforts. On the other hand, Radomlje leads the league with an offensive conversion rate of 12.7%. Their expected goals per 90 minutes reach 1.43, far exceeding Mura's 0.89. They also have a key pass success rate of 83.4% and a front - field passing value index of 27.1, significantly better than Mura's 69.1% and 18.4. This shows that Radomlje has a more well - structured offensive organization. If you're interested in more in - depth analysis, you can follow me for continuous updates. Redomić shows remarkable performance on both offense and defense. In terms of midfield control, Redomić has a ball possession rate of 58.7% and a short - pass success rate of 91.3% per game. The speed of initiating fast - counter attac
      AH
      SLO D1 NK Mura 05 - Radomlje
    • In this Danish Superliga encounter, a comparison between Silkeborg and Odense reveals some key differences. Silkeborg has been struggling in the attacking department recently. Their conversion rate in the final third over the last five games is a mere 8.2%, significantly lower than Odense's 14.7%. Odense also boasts a better expected goals per game efficiency of 0.93, compared to Silkeborg's 0.61. In terms of passing, Odense shines. Their key pass success rate stands at an impressive 78.4%, and their attacking third pass value index is 1.82. These figures are far better than Silkeborg's 69.1% and 1.35 respectively. When it comes to midfield control, Odense is dominant. Their midfield interception success rate is over 85%, and they have an average transition speed of 12.7 meters per second when in possession, faster than Silkeborg's 10.1 meters per second. In terms of running statistics, Odense shows more energy. They have an average of 112 high - intensity sprints throughout the game,
      AH
      DEN SASL Silkeborg IF - Odense BK
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.