FC Karpaty Lviv vs LNZ Cherkasy Tips and Predictions O/U Pi314

Ukrainian Premier League

Analysis More Tips

FC Karpaty Lviv

LNZ Cherkasy

Further Reading

Borja Jiménez “El mago” 🤠

Karpati has been in great form at home this season. In 6 home games, they have 4 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss, with a win - rate of 66.7%. They average 2.33 goals per game and only concede 0.83 goals, ranking among the top in the league in both offensive and defensive statistics. In the last 5 home games, they scored 14 goals and conceded only 5, with 3 clean sheets, showing excellent defensive stability. On the offensive end, they average 4.09 corner kicks per game, indicating high - efficiency wing play. An average of 1.3 yellow cards per game also suggests that the game rhythm is under control. On the other hand, LNZ Cherkasy's away performance has been mediocre. In the last 5 away games, they have 2 wins, 2 draws, and 1 loss, a 50% win - rate. However, they only average 1.5 goals per game, showing obvious inefficiency in attack. Although their away defense is solid (conceding only 0.5 goals per game on average), the lack of offensive firepower has led to 2 draws in the last 3 away game

AH
UKR D1 FC Karpaty Lviv - LNZ Cherkasy
Mr Well

Comparing the initial odds with the real - time ones. Although Kapadie is playing at home, its attacking efficiency is relatively low. In the last five matches, its offensive conversion rate is only 7.2%, and the expected goal efficiency is 18% lower than the league average. On the other hand, LNZ Cherkasy leads the Ukrainian Premier League with an offensive conversion rate of 12.4%. Its key passing success rate is as high as 83.6%, and the value of its forward passes is 31% higher than that of Kapadie. In midfield control, LNZ has an average ball - possession rate of 59% per game, a short - pass success rate of 91.4%, and a fast - counterattack speed of 18.7 km/h, significantly better than Kapadie's 14.1 km/h. I suggest setting up app message notifications to get timely recommendations and keep getting surprises every day！ LNZ Cherkasy has been showing a solid performance in recent games, especially in terms of their defensive and offensive capabilities. On the defensive end, LNZ Ch

AH
UKR D1 FC Karpaty Lviv - LNZ Cherkasy
Jose Cid

Kapardy opts for a 4 - 3 - 3 pressing formation at home. Right from the start, they take the initiative to control the ball. The front three launch high - intensity pressing on the spot, forcing the visiting team to make hasty clearances from their backcourt. The wingers on both flanks frequently make vertical runs, stretching the five - man defense of the away team. They create opportunities through a combination of crosses from the wings, penetrations in the middle, and set - pieces. In the first half, Kapardy steadily applies pressure and probes the opponent's defense without recklessly launching an all - out attack. LNZ Cherkasy adopts a defensive strategy of 5-4-1 away from home. They abandon ball possession, with nine players staying in front of the penalty area to form a dense defensive barrier. The midfielders are tasked solely with intercepting and disrupting the opponents' attacks, leaving only a single forward to wait for long passes from the back for sporadic counter - atta

AH
UKR D1 FC Karpaty Lviv - LNZ Cherkasy

More Recommend

Mura has been struggling in their recent offensive performance. In their last five matches, their average offensive conversion rate is only 6.2%, and their expected goals efficiency is 18% lower than the league average. Their attack often relies on individual players' solo efforts. On the other hand, Radomlje leads the league with an offensive conversion rate of 12.7%. Their expected goals per 90 minutes reach 1.43, far exceeding Mura's 0.89. They also have a key pass success rate of 83.4% and a front - field passing value index of 27.1, significantly better than Mura's 69.1% and 18.4. This shows that Radomlje has a more well - structured offensive organization. If you're interested in more in - depth analysis, you can follow me for continuous updates. Redomić shows remarkable performance on both offense and defense. In terms of midfield control, Redomić has a ball possession rate of 58.7% and a short - pass success rate of 91.3% per game. The speed of initiating fast - counter attac

AH
SLO D1 NK Mura 05 - Radomlje
In this Danish Superliga encounter, a comparison between Silkeborg and Odense reveals some key differences. Silkeborg has been struggling in the attacking department recently. Their conversion rate in the final third over the last five games is a mere 8.2%, significantly lower than Odense's 14.7%. Odense also boasts a better expected goals per game efficiency of 0.93, compared to Silkeborg's 0.61. In terms of passing, Odense shines. Their key pass success rate stands at an impressive 78.4%, and their attacking third pass value index is 1.82. These figures are far better than Silkeborg's 69.1% and 1.35 respectively. When it comes to midfield control, Odense is dominant. Their midfield interception success rate is over 85%, and they have an average transition speed of 12.7 meters per second when in possession, faster than Silkeborg's 10.1 meters per second. In terms of running statistics, Odense shows more energy. They have an average of 112 high - intensity sprints throughout the game,

AH
DEN SASL Silkeborg IF - Odense BK
Kluge is playing at home. In terms of the offensive end, its conversion rate of offensive finishes reaches as high as 18.7%, far exceeding Cluj University's 9.2%. Its expected goals efficiency (xG/Offensive Finish) is 0.16, ranking among the top five in the league. The key pass success rate of Kluge is 73.4%, and the front - court passing value index reaches 12.8, significantly better than the opponent's 61.1% and 8.9. In terms of midfield control, Kluge has a ball - possession rate of 62%. The average short - pass success rate is 91.3%, and the speed of fast - break advancement reaches 28.4 km/h, far exceeding the opponent's 21.1 km/h. In running data, Kluge has a total of 412 high - intensity sprints throughout the game, and the average running distance reaches 112.3 kilometers. Its physical fitness reserve and coverage density are clearly superior. Join me to stay updated on more match analyses！ Cluj has been solid at the back, averaging 8.7 tackles, 6.3 interceptions, and 14.1 cl

AH
ROM D1 CFR Cluj - Universitaea Cluj

0 Comments

All

By Author

Add Comment

Post

FC Karpaty Lviv VS LNZ Cherkasy