Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Okiem Madridisty>

    Newcastle United VS Everton

    International Club Friendly
    Analysis More Tips
    Newcastle United
    Newcastle United
    Everton
    Everton
    Further Reading
    • blume
      blume
      Newcastle United and Everton show a clear disparity in offensive efficiency. Newcastle's conversion rate in the final third in recent matches stands at 12%, higher than Everton's 9%. However, their expected goals (xG) averages are 1.2 and 0.9 respectively, and both teams have failed to meet their expected goal - scoring numbers. In terms of passing data, Newcastle's success rate of key passes is 78%, which is better than Everton's 70%. Newcastle also has an edge in the value of forward - field passes, with 1.4 passes per game compared to Everton's 1.2. This indicates that Newcastle has a stronger offensive organization ability. When it comes to midfield control, Newcastle is expected to have a 60% possession rate. Coupled with an average of 12 counter - attacks per game, their offensive threat from counter - attacks is much greater than Everton's, which only manages 8 counter - attacks per game. Newcastle United and Everton show a clear difference in offensive efficiency. Newcastle's o
      AH
      INT CF Newcastle United - Everton
    • Sachin Singh
      Sachin Singh
      The historical encounters between Newcastle United and Everton show distinct differences in offensive and defensive data. In the last ten meetings, Newcastle United's home performances have been quite volatile. They lost 2 - 3 in one match, with a 1 - 2 score at half - time and 7 - 2 in corner kicks. Another time, they suffered a 0 - 1 defeat, being level 0 - 0 at half - time and losing the corner - kick count 12 - 3. There was also a 0 - 0 draw where they had 0 - 10 in corner kicks, and a 1 - 1 tie with 7 - 3 in corner kicks. They managed a narrow 1 - 0 victory with 8 - 2 in corner kicks and a convincing 3 - 1 win with 6 - 2 in corner kicks. On the other hand, Everton's away performances have been somewhat consistent. They lost 1 - 4 in one away game with 8 - 7 in corner kicks, but also achieved a 3 - 0 victory with 5 - 2 in corner kicks. In another away match, they lost 1 - 4 with 3 - 14 in corner kicks. This historical data provides valuable clues for analyzing their future confront
      AH
      INT CF Newcastle United - Everton
    • Big Strongbull
      Big Strongbull
      Newcastle United has a remarkable edge when playing at home. This season, their home win - rate is as high as 75%. In their last four home games, they scored 10 goals while conceding only 4, with a goal difference of 6. They averaged 2.5 goals per game and 1.0 goal conceded per game. On the offensive end, Newcastle United is in full swing. Their average number of corner kicks per game is stable at 5.4. Their set - piece tactics are executed efficiently. Coupled with their high - efficiency offensive organization ability, they can effectively suppress the opponent's defense. In terms of defense, they show excellent discipline. The average number of yellow cards per game is only 1.1, which reflects that players focus on tactical execution and rhythm control on the pitch, reducing unnecessary fouls. In contrast, Everton performs poorly on the road. Their away win - rate is only 25%. In the last four away games, they scored 10 goals and conceded 10, with a goal difference of zero. They ave
      AH
      INT CF Newcastle United - Everton
    More Recommend
    • In this friendly match, the offensive efficiency between Manchester United and Leeds United shows a clear disparity. Manchester United leads with an offensive conversion rate of 18.3%, compared to Leeds United's 14.1%. Moreover, Manchester United's xG efficiency reaches 2.4, while Leeds United has 1.9. The success rate of key forward passes for Manchester United is 82%, better than Leeds United's 74%. In terms of midfield control, Manchester United achieves rapid transitions with a 68% ball - possession rate. Their average sprint speed is 34.2 km/h, 1.8 km/h faster than Leeds United. Both teams have a running distance of over 110 kilometers, but Manchester United's high - intensity sprints (19 times) are significantly more than Leeds United's 14 times. I believe that only by providing dedicated analysis can we achieve long - term development. Leeds United's defensive stats are concerning. They only managed 9 successful tackles in the whole game, fewer than Manchester United's 14. Also,
      O/U
      INT CF Manchester United - Leeds United
    • Arsenal has been in excellent form lately, and this is likely to be reflected in their friendly match against Como. In terms of offensive efficiency, Arsenal holds a clear edge. Their attacking conversion rate stands at 24% with an xG efficiency of 1.8, while Como only manages 15% and an xG efficiency of 1.2. The passing accuracy is also in Arsenal's favor, with a key - pass success rate of 85% compared to Como's 72%. This shows Arsenal's superior precision in passing and combination plays. Arsenal is better at creating threatening penetrations in the attacking third. The value of their forward passes is 0.65, much higher than Como's 0.41. In the midfield area, Arsenal controls the ball 60% of the time, and 45% of their attacks are initiated within 3 seconds, indicating a good tactical linkage. There are also differences in the physical aspects. Arsenal covers a distance of 110 km during the game, compared to Como's 102 km. The number of high - intensity sprints is 150 for Arsenal and
      O/U
      INT CF Arsenal - Como
    • In this friendly match, Leverkusen shows a significant edge in offensive efficiency. Statistics indicate that Leverkusen's average conversion rate of offensive finishes this season stands at 18.3%, higher than Nottingham Forest's 14.1%. Moreover, Leverkusen's xG (expected goals) efficiency reaches 2.1 per game, while Nottingham Forest only manages 1.6 per game. In terms of passing efficiency, Leverkusen's key pass success rate is 82%, and its PTV (passing value) in the front - field is +0.43, far exceeding Nottingham Forest's +0.21. When it comes to midfield control and transition speed, Leverkusen's average ball - possession rate of 62% combined with 15.8 high - speed sprints per game suppresses Nottingham Forest, which has a 54% ball - possession rate and 12.4 sprints. Under high - intensity running, Leverkusen's total running distance is 112 km, 3.2 km more than that of Nottingham Forest. I believe that only by making careful recommendations can we achieve long - term development. L
      O/U
      INT CF Nottingham Forest - Bayer Leverkusen
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.