Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
YomiAICryptoWon 14/14Follow82.4%Win Rate +45.1%ROI 19Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
2
AfsiezWon 15/19Follow78.9%Win Rate +45.8%ROI 19Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
2
AbuleWon 4/5Follow78.9%Win Rate +25.4%ROI 19Tips 1.68Avg Odds -
4
b3ndarWon 6/7Follow76.9%Win Rate +23.9%ROI 13Tips 1.82Avg Odds -
5
udadheWon 10/12Follow76.2%Win Rate +55.4%ROI 21Tips 2.21Avg Odds -
6
KnightopeeWon 7/7Follow75%Win Rate +41.1%ROI 23Tips 1.98Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
peter habakkukArsenal's recent form in friendly matches has shown significant fluctuations. They suffered a 2-3 defeat to Borussia Dortmund in an away game, trailing 0-2 at halftime and being at a disadvantage in corner kicks with 3 to 8. They also lost 1-3 to Real Betis on a neutral ground, trailing 1-3 at halftime with 2 corner kicks each. However, they had a 4-1 victory over Girona in an away game, leading 2-0 at halftime with 5 corner kicks to 4. In these three friendlies, they had one win and two losses, averaging 1.67 goals scored and 2.33 goals conceded per game, indicating prominent defensive flaws. In a previous Champions League semi - final, they drew 1-1 with Paris Saint - Germain. The lopsided corner - kick data of 10-0 demonstrated their ball - control advantage, but their offensive and defensive efficiency in the friendlies has not met expectations. Although they were in good form at the end of the European competitions and the league, their recent performance in friendlies has declineO/U
INT CF
Arsenal
1-1 Como
-
Jack PellegriniArsenal has been in excellent form lately, and this was clearly demonstrated in their friendly match against Como. In terms of offensive efficiency and game control, Arsenal held a significant edge. The offensive conversion rate told the story. Arsenal's conversion rate was.24% with an xG efficiency of 1.8, while Como's was only 15% with an xG efficiency of 1.2. The success rate of key passes also showed Arsenal's superiority, with 85% compared to Como's 72%, indicating a better passing and combination precision. The value of forward passes further emphasized Arsenal's ability to create threatening penetrations. Arsenal's value of 0.65 was far higher than Como's 0.41. In the midfield, Arsenal's 60% ball - possession rate worked in tandem with their 45% proportion of offensive transitions within three seconds, a well - coordinated tactical approach. The difference in physical performance also highlighted the disparity between the two teams. Arsenal covered 110 km in running distance, coAHINT CF
Arsenal
1-1 Como
-
WengertetaArsenal's recent form has been relatively stable, with a balanced performance in both attack and defense. This season, Arsenal has a win - rate of 60%, a draw - rate of 20%, and a loss - rate of 20%. They've scored 17 goals and conceded 10, with a goal difference of +7. Their average goals per game are 1.7, while the average goals conceded per game stand at 1.2. When playing at home, Arsenal maintains a 60% win - rate. They've scored 8 goals and conceded 6, averaging 1.6 goals per game and 1.2 goals conceded per game, which shows their competitiveness in home matches. On the other hand, Como features higher offensive efficiency. Their win - rate is 60%, draw - rate 30%, and loss - rate 10%. They've scored 19 goals and conceded 10, with a goal difference of +9. Their average goals per game are 1.9, 0.2 more than Arsenal. In away games, their offensive power is more prominent, with an average of 2.0 goals per game and only 1.2 goals conceded per game. These statistics highlight the key pO/UINT CF
Arsenal
1-1 Como
INT CF
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post