Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
YomiAICryptoWon 14/14Follow82.4%Win Rate +45.1%ROI 19Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
2
AfsiezWon 15/19Follow78.9%Win Rate +45.8%ROI 19Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
2
AbuleWon 4/5Follow78.9%Win Rate +25.4%ROI 19Tips 1.68Avg Odds -
4
b3ndarWon 6/7Follow76.9%Win Rate +23.9%ROI 13Tips 1.82Avg Odds -
5
udadheWon 10/12Follow76.2%Win Rate +55.4%ROI 21Tips 2.21Avg Odds -
6
KnightopeeWon 7/7Follow75%Win Rate +41.1%ROI 23Tips 1.98Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Soccer Som Won 3/4The difference in league standings between Manchester United and Leeds United adds tactical intrigue to their friendly match, despite it not counting towards official points. Manchester United, finishing sixth in the Premier League, demonstrated strong competitiveness last season, while Leeds United, ranked thirteenth, hovered in the middle - of - the - table, highlighting a gap in strength. This friendly serves as an opportunity for both teams to focus on squad integration and tactical drills in preparation for the upcoming season. Since neither team has recent official - game data due to the nature of this warm - up, the key is to test player form and make tactical adjustments. The Manchester United manager may concentrate on assessing how well the new signings fit into the attack. With their rich attacking options upfront, the team aims to enhance overall offensive efficiency. In recent history, Leeds United has held the upper hand in the head - to - head encounters with ManchesterO/U
INT CF
Manchester United
1-1 Leeds United
-
amvn Won 8/11I'm a well - established expert in football analysis, offering long - term high - quality insights. In a friendly match between Manchester United and Leeds United, there were clear differences in offensive efficiency. Manchester United led with an offensive conversion rate of 18.3%, compared to Leeds United's 14.1%. The expected goals (xG) efficiency of Manchester United was 2.4, while Leeds United's was 1.9. Moreover, Manchester United's success rate of key forward passes was 82%, better than Leeds United's 74%. In midfield control, Manchester United achieved quick transitions with a 68% ball - possession rate. Their average sprint speed was 34.2 km/h, 1.8 km/h faster than Leeds United. Both teams covered over 110 kilometers in running distance. However, Manchester United had 19 high - intensity sprints, significantly more than Leeds United's 14.O/UINT CF
Manchester United
1-1 Leeds United
-
MR. OSEI😎In this friendly encounter, the difference in the league standings between Manchester United and Leeds United adds value to tactical discussions. Manchester United, ranked sixth in the Premier League, finished in the top of the league last season, demonstrating strong competitiveness. On the other hand, Leeds United, ranked thirteenth, hovered in the middle of the table, and their lower position highlights the gap in strength. Although this match doesn't count towards the official league points, it serves as a crucial opportunity for both teams to focus on squad integration and tactical drills in preparation for the upcoming official season. Given the nature of the friendly, neither team has recent official - match data to rely on. So, the key of this warm - up game lies in testing the players' form and making tactical adjustments. The Manchester United manager may focus on assessing how the new signings fit into the attacking line - up. With their rich attacking options in the front,O/UINT CF
Manchester United
1-1 Leeds United
INT CF
More Recommend
-
Both Chicago Fire and Vancouver Whitecaps have shown strong competitiveness in the MLS with a 60% win rate. However, the detailed data reveals significant differences in their tactical styles. Chicago Fire has scored 22 goals and conceded 14, with a goal difference of 8 and an average of 2.2 goals per game. Vancouver Whitecaps also has 22 goals, but only 10 conceded, resulting in a goal difference of 12. They also average 2.2 goals per game. This indicates that both teams have similar offensive firepower, but Vancouver Whitecaps has a more outstanding defensive efficiency. Vancouver Whitecaps concedes only 1.0 goal per game, while Chicago Fire concedes 1.4, which directly widens the goal - difference gap. In terms of home - away performance, Chicago Fire has a 50% win rate at home. They average 2.0 goals and 1.8 conceded per home game, with a goal difference of 3. This shows that they lack stability when playing at home, as their loss rate is also 50%. Vancouver Whitecaps have a 33.3%O/U
MLS
Chicago Fire
-
Vancouver Whitecaps
-
Klubi has shown remarkable strength in recent home games. In the Romanian League, they thrashed Voluntari and Arges 5 - 0 and 3 - 0 respectively at home. They took a 3 - 0 and 2 - 0 lead in the first half of these matches. The corner - kick statistics, 10 - 0 and 13 - 5, clearly demonstrate their superiority in offensive organization and game control. After a 3 - 0 home win over Arges in the Europa Conference League, Klubi also secured a 3 - 1 away victory against Rapid București in the Romanian League. Despite a 0 - 5 away loss to Tromsø in the Europa Conference League, their home record proves their dominance on home soil. On the other hand, Universitatea Cluj has had a relatively stable away form. After a 3 - 1 away defeat to Brann in the Europa Conference League and a 1 - 0 away loss to Sfântu Gheorghe in the Romanian League, they managed a 0 - 0 draw against Dynamo Kyiv in the Europa League. The 10 - 4 corner - kick statistics highlight the discipline of their defensive tacticsO/U
ROM D1
CFR Cluj
Postp. Universitaea Cluj
MLS
ROM D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post