Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Brandon Mitchell
310
Articles
1
Like
1
Follower
52.9%
Win Rate
-5.5%
ROI
55
Tips
1.90
Avg Odds
Member Ranking
-
1
YomiAICryptoWon 14/14Follow82.4%Win Rate +45.1%ROI 19Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
2
AfsiezWon 15/19Follow78.9%Win Rate +45.8%ROI 19Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
2
AbuleWon 4/5Follow78.9%Win Rate +25.4%ROI 19Tips 1.68Avg Odds -
4
b3ndarWon 6/7Follow76.9%Win Rate +23.9%ROI 13Tips 1.82Avg Odds -
5
udadheWon 10/12Follow76.2%Win Rate +55.4%ROI 21Tips 2.21Avg Odds -
6
KnightopeeWon 7/7Follow75%Win Rate +41.1%ROI 23Tips 1.98Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Stef Olivier KArsenal has shown significant fluctuations in their recent friendly matches. In a series of pre - season games, their performance has been inconsistent. In one of the friendlies, they suffered a 2 - 3 defeat to Borussia Dortmund, trailing 0 - 2 at halftime and being outnumbered in corner kicks 8 - 3. Another loss came against Real Betis with a 1 - 3 score, also losing 1 - 3 at the break and having an equal number of corner kicks. However, they did manage a 4 - 1 victory over Girona, although they were 0 - 2 down in the first half. In these three friendlies, they achieved a record of one win and two losses, averaging 1.67 goals and conceding 2.33 goals per game. This indicates prominent defensive weaknesses. Previously, in the Champions League semi - finals, they drew 1 - 1 with Paris Saint - Germain. The lopsided corner - kick data of 10 - 0 demonstrated their ball - possession advantage. But in the warm - up games, their offensive and defensive efficiency has fallen short of expectatiO/U
INT CF
Arsenal
1-1 Como
-
GavinwangIn the club friendly match between Arsenal and Como, a comparison of offensive and defensive data reveals some key aspects. Como has been more efficient on the offensive end, averaging 1.9 goals per game, which is higher than Arsenal's 1.7. On the defensive side, they are also more solid, conceding an average of 1.1 goals per game, lower than Arsenal's 1.2. Looking at the overall data, Como scored 19 goals and conceded only 10 in all matches, with a goal difference of +9. Arsenal, on the other hand, scored 17 goals and conceded 10, with a goal difference of +7. Both teams have a winning rate of 60%. However, Como's draw rate of 30% is significantly higher than Arsenal's 20%, indicating a more stable result. Meanwhile, Arsenal's loss rate of 20% suggests that their ability to handle pressure in crucial moments may be slightly lacking. Como averages 4.5 corner kicks per game, leading Arsenal's 3.3. This indicates that they may have an edge in ball - control rhythm and set - piece attacksO/UINT CF
Arsenal
1-1 Como
-
Jack PellegriniArsenal has been in excellent form lately, and this was clearly demonstrated in their friendly match against Como. In terms of offensive efficiency and game control, Arsenal held a significant edge. The offensive conversion rate told the story. Arsenal's conversion rate was.24% with an xG efficiency of 1.8, while Como's was only 15% with an xG efficiency of 1.2. The success rate of key passes also showed Arsenal's superiority, with 85% compared to Como's 72%, indicating a better passing and combination precision. The value of forward passes further emphasized Arsenal's ability to create threatening penetrations. Arsenal's value of 0.65 was far higher than Como's 0.41. In the midfield, Arsenal's 60% ball - possession rate worked in tandem with their 45% proportion of offensive transitions within three seconds, a well - coordinated tactical approach. The difference in physical performance also highlighted the disparity between the two teams. Arsenal covered 110 km in running distance, coAHINT CF
Arsenal
1-1 Como
INT CF
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post