Abha vs Al-Hazm Tips and Predictions O/U Okiem Madridisty

Saudi Professional League

Analysis More Tips

Abha

Al-Hazm

Further Reading

MSsportsworldHQ

The historical encounters between Abha and Al-Hazem clearly reveal differences in tactical styles. In home games against Al-Hazem, Abha has an edge in corner kicks. In past matches, Abha won 2 - 1 at home with a 7 - 1 corner - kick advantage, and also drew 1 - 1 at home with a 5 - 1 corner - kick lead. On the other hand, Al-Hazem has shown strong performance on the road. In several away games, it achieved big wins, like a 4 - 1 victory with a 4 - 3 corner - kick record and a 2 - 1 win with a 4 - 4 corner - kick result. In the last three encounters, Al-Hazem has won all its away games, and the corner - kick data was at least 4 - 3, which highlights the efficiency of its away offensive system. In terms of offensive and defensive efficiency, Abha has a significant corner - kick advantage at home. In their last two home encounters, the corner - kick ratio was over 5 - 1, which reflects the stability of their wing attacks and set - piece tactics. Hashemite shows strong offensive firepower o

O/U
SPL Abha 1-2 Al-Hazm
Rowland🤍

Looking at the historical head - to - head records in the Saudi Professional League, Hassoun has a clear edge when playing away against Abha. The latest data shows that Hassoun has won all three of its most recent away games against Abha in the Saudi Professional League. Their offensive efficiency on the road has been extremely high. In all these three victories, they scored at least two goals and kept a clean sheet, demonstrating solid defensive stability. On the other hand, Abha has achieved only one win and two draws in their last three home games against Hassoun. Considering Hassoun's strong away - game performance and Abha's relatively mediocre home - game record in recent encounters, Hassoun seems to have a good chance in future match - ups with Abha. In recent encounters, Abha's offensive efficiency at home has notably declined when facing Al-Hazem. Since a win, they haven't managed another victory. The corner - kick statistics further highlight Al-Hazem's superiority. In previo

O/U
SPL Abha 1-2 Al-Hazm
freekbass

Al-Bukayriyah has had a mediocre performance in their last 10 matches, with 5 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses. The team's major issue might be the lack of squad depth. On the other hand, Al-Hazem has won 4, drawn 3 and lost 3 in their past 10 games, showing excellent defensive capabilities on the road. Al-Bukayriyah's current form is obvious to all. They are expected to put up a good fight in this game, demonstrating their combat ability. In terms of the comparison of strength, Al-Bukayriyah still holds an edge. Although Al-Hazem is the underdog, they have a positive attitude towards this match and are eager to grab points. However, Al-Hazem's point - grabbing momentum has been on the decline. They drew their last game and have failed to win in the last two rounds. When it comes to a head - to - head encounter between Al-Bukayriyah and Al-Hazem, Al-Hazem doesn't have many advantages. Overall, considering the situation, Al-Bukayriyah is more likely to perform better in this game. The home tea

AH
SPL Abha 1-2 Al-Hazm

More Recommend

In this Europa Cup encounter, let's analyze the performances of Sofia Central Army and Maccabi Tel Aviv. Sofia Central Army has a lower offensive conversion rate in the Europa League this season, at 12%, compared to Maccabi Tel Aviv's 14%. However, Sofia Central Army shows more stability with an expected goals (xG) value of 1.8 per game. In terms of key pass success rates, Sofia Central Army has an edge with 65%, while Maccabi Tel Aviv only manages 58%. But Maccabi Tel Aviv has a higher expected assists value of 0.8 from forward passes. Sofia Central Army's midfield maintains a 55% ball - possession rate and executes 15 counter - attacks per game, slightly outperforming Maccabi Tel Aviv's 12 counter - attacks. Both teams cover a running distance of over 110 km. Nevertheless, Sofia Central Army conducts 60 high - intensity sprints per game, 8 more than Maccabi Tel Aviv. I believe that only by making careful and well - thought - out recommendations can there be long - term development. I

O/U
UEFA EL CSKA Sofia - Maccabi Tel Aviv
In this Europa Cup encounter, a comparison between Anderlecht and Thessaloniki reveals some interesting insights. Anderlecht's recent offensive conversion rate stands at 12.3% per game, lower than Thessaloniki's 14.1%. However, Anderlecht has a better expected goals (xG) value of 1.8, compared to Thessaloniki's 1.4, indicating that they create higher - quality goal - scoring opportunities. In terms of key passing, Anderlecht has an edge. Their key passing success rate is 78%, outperforming Thessaloniki's 72%. The value of their forward passes is 0.45, while Thessaloniki's is 0.38, which shows that Anderlecht has a stronger ability to penetrate the opponent's defense. When it comes to midfield control, Anderlecht regains possession of the ball 58 times per game on average. This is 7 times more than Thessaloniki, and they can launch counter - attacks at a speed of 1.2 times per minute. In high - intensity running statistics, Anderlecht also shows superiority. The home team runs at a spri

O/U
UEFA EL Anderlecht - PAOK Saloniki
In the Europa Cup, the attacking efficiency between Glasgow Rangers and Bialystok Jagiellonia shows a significant disparity. Looking at the attacking conversion rate in recent matches, Rangers have been more effective. In their last 5 games, Rangers' offensive conversion rate reached 18.3%, higher than Jagiellonia's 12.7%. The expected goals (xG) average also reflects their stronger finishing ability, with Rangers at 2.1 compared to Jagiellonia's 1.6. In passing, Rangers have a better performance. Their key - pass success rate is 82%, outperforming Jagiellonia's 74%. The value of their front - field passes, 1.83, is also higher than Jagiellonia's 1.45, indicating a more efficient offensive organization. When it comes to midfield control, Rangers dominate. They average 61% ball possession per game, combined with 15.3 high - speed counter - attacks. In contrast, Jagiellonia only has 44% ball possession and 9.8 counter - attacks per game. In terms of physical data, Rangers have an edge in

O/U
UEFA EL Glasgow Rangers - Jagiellonia Bialystok

0 Comments

All

By Author

Add Comment

Post

Abha VS Al-Hazm