Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Okiem Madridisty>

    Vikingur Reykjavik VS Thun

    UEFA Europa League
    Analysis More Tips
    Vikingur Reykjavik
    Vikingur Reykjavik 1
    1 Thun
    Thun
    Further Reading
    • The Touchline | 𝐓
      The Touchline | 𝐓 Won 4/5
      Vikingur has been in good form recently, performing well in several recent matches, which has greatly boosted the morale of the players. In previous encounters, the two teams have had mixed results, but Vikingur holds an advantage in the head - to - head record. However, Vikingur has not been scoring well at home recently. Although the gap between home - game performance and its opponent is not significant. On the other hand, Thun's form has been mediocre and inconsistent. Thun is a team that performs better away from home than at home. In terms of paper strength, Vikingur is superior to Thun. Both teams will give their all in this game. It remains to be seen which team will emerge victorious.
      O/U
      UEFA EL Vikingur Reykjavik 0-1 Thun
    • Аrtur Silva
      Аrtur Silva
      Vikingur Reykjavik currently has a complete squad, with no significant injuries or suspensions. In the Icelandic Premier League, they've shown great dominance at home. They've won 9 and drawn 1 in their last 10 home games. In the last 6 home matches, they've achieved 5 wins and 1 draw, scoring 15 goals and conceding 6. They mainly adopt a 4 - 3 - 3 high - pressure formation, creating scoring opportunities through wing attacks and set - pieces. However, in defense, they've conceded at least 2 goals in each of the last 4 games. In the previous league round, they drew 2 - 2 with Vestmannaeyjar at home. On the other hand, Thun, as the Swiss Super League champion last season, achieved the "Kaiserslautern Miracle". But this summer, they suffered a loss of key players. Their top scorer, Lastord (15 goals), joined Panathinaikos, and Bertone (11 goals) moved to Lucerne. In the new season of the Swiss Super League, they've had a poor start, only getting 3 points from 3 rounds. They conceded 10 g
      AH
      UEFA EL Vikingur Reykjavik 0-1 Thun
    • imaagination✨🐣
      imaagination✨🐣
      Vikingur Reykjavik, a participant in the Europa Cup, has a well - defined playing style. They focus on short - passing ground attacks. The players have excellent teamwork in small - scale passing and cutting, and they can advance steadily in positional play with clear strategies and a well - controlled rhythm. The team has an average passing success rate of 63.7% recently. The midfield is very stable in ball - handling and passing, and they are good at gradually changing the opponent's defensive formation, steadily building up offensive advantages in the front - field. Their flank penetration tactics in the front - field are quite mature. However, Vikingur Reykjavik also has its weaknesses. The pace of their offensive - defensive transition is relatively slow. When facing a fast counter - attack from the opponent, the back - line players may not be able to quickly get back into position to defend. Vikingur Reykjavik has shown a solid defensive performance in recent games, which gives t
      AH
      UEFA EL Vikingur Reykjavik 0-1 Thun
    More Recommend
    • In this Europa Cup encounter, let's analyze the performances of Sofia Central Army and Maccabi Tel Aviv. Sofia Central Army has a lower offensive conversion rate in the Europa League this season, at 12%, compared to Maccabi Tel Aviv's 14%. However, Sofia Central Army shows more stability with an expected goals (xG) value of 1.8 per game. In terms of key pass success rates, Sofia Central Army has an edge with 65%, while Maccabi Tel Aviv only manages 58%. But Maccabi Tel Aviv has a higher expected assists value of 0.8 from forward passes. Sofia Central Army's midfield maintains a 55% ball - possession rate and executes 15 counter - attacks per game, slightly outperforming Maccabi Tel Aviv's 12 counter - attacks. Both teams cover a running distance of over 110 km. Nevertheless, Sofia Central Army conducts 60 high - intensity sprints per game, 8 more than Maccabi Tel Aviv. I believe that only by making careful and well - thought - out recommendations can there be long - term development. I
      O/U
      UEFA EL CSKA Sofia - Maccabi Tel Aviv
    • In this Europa Cup encounter, a comparison between Anderlecht and Thessaloniki reveals some interesting insights. Anderlecht's recent offensive conversion rate stands at 12.3% per game, lower than Thessaloniki's 14.1%. However, Anderlecht has a better expected goals (xG) value of 1.8, compared to Thessaloniki's 1.4, indicating that they create higher - quality goal - scoring opportunities. In terms of key passing, Anderlecht has an edge. Their key passing success rate is 78%, outperforming Thessaloniki's 72%. The value of their forward passes is 0.45, while Thessaloniki's is 0.38, which shows that Anderlecht has a stronger ability to penetrate the opponent's defense. When it comes to midfield control, Anderlecht regains possession of the ball 58 times per game on average. This is 7 times more than Thessaloniki, and they can launch counter - attacks at a speed of 1.2 times per minute. In high - intensity running statistics, Anderlecht also shows superiority. The home team runs at a spri
      O/U
      UEFA EL Anderlecht - PAOK Saloniki
    • In the Europa Cup, the attacking efficiency between Glasgow Rangers and Bialystok Jagiellonia shows a significant disparity. Looking at the attacking conversion rate in recent matches, Rangers have been more effective. In their last 5 games, Rangers' offensive conversion rate reached 18.3%, higher than Jagiellonia's 12.7%. The expected goals (xG) average also reflects their stronger finishing ability, with Rangers at 2.1 compared to Jagiellonia's 1.6. In passing, Rangers have a better performance. Their key - pass success rate is 82%, outperforming Jagiellonia's 74%. The value of their front - field passes, 1.83, is also higher than Jagiellonia's 1.45, indicating a more efficient offensive organization. When it comes to midfield control, Rangers dominate. They average 61% ball possession per game, combined with 15.3 high - speed counter - attacks. In contrast, Jagiellonia only has 44% ball possession and 9.8 counter - attacks per game. In terms of physical data, Rangers have an edge in
      O/U
      UEFA EL Glasgow Rangers - Jagiellonia Bialystok
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.