Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Okiem Madridisty>

    Rosenborg BK VS Viking

    Norway Eliteserien
    Analysis More Tips
    Rosenborg BK
    Rosenborg BK
    Viking
    Viking
    Further Reading
    • MC James
      MC James Won 3/5
      Rosenborg has shown a mixed form in recent matches, with 5 wins, 1 draw, and 4 losses in their last 10 games. Their defense has been far from solid, full of gaps and incoordination. On the other hand, Viking has a better record, winning 7, drawing 2, and losing 1 in their past 10 games. They've scored 11 goals in total, with an average of 1.1 goals per game, and conceded 20 goals, averaging 2 goals per game. Rosenborg has demonstrated good performance in many aspects, indicating their strong fighting spirit in this game. They've withstood various challenges, suggesting that their ability to handle pressure is likely stronger than Viking's. Viking, however, struggles with a low - scoring rate while conceding a large number of goals. Rosenborg's current form is obvious to all. Although they haven't performed well in the last few matches, it's not because of their poor overall strength. In terms of the lineup for this match, Rosenborg holds a certain advantage. The question now is whether
      O/U
      NOR D1 Rosenborg BK - Viking
    • Diablos Rojos UY
      Diablos Rojos UY
      Rosenborg has had a dismal record, and the team's morale is currently at an all - time low. In terms of strength, Rosenborg and Viking are quite comparable. Although Rosenborg's past record was poor, they've recently been in good form, having secured multiple victories. They are a mid - table team, and the gap between them and Viking isn't significant. On the other hand, Viking isn't inferior to Rosenborg in various aspects. In this match, the two teams seem evenly matched. Rosenborg has shown good performance in this game, and their fighting spirit is beyond doubt. Moreover, they have an obvious advantage in terms of physical fitness. The question now is, which team will be able to showcase their true strength and emerge victorious in this game? Rosenborg has suffered a loss recently, and their current form is not ideal. In contrast, Viking's recent performance is quite different. Their results have greatly boosted the morale of the players, showing great tenacity. The team is good at
      AH
      NOR D1 Rosenborg BK - Viking
    • SmolBeans
      SmolBeans
      Rosenborg has been performing excellently in recent matches. In contrast, Viking has shown mediocre form. Both teams are currently experiencing a period of fluctuating form. Although Viking has had a poor run lately and is in a concerning state. Looking at their head - to - head record, Rosenborg holds a clear advantage. They have dominated their past encounters with Viking. Despite the two teams having similar overall strengths, Rosenborg has the upper hand in previous meetings. However, Rosenborg has just suffered three consecutive home defeats, which has dampened their morale. Given these circumstances, it's hard to predict which team will come out on top in this upcoming match. Rosenborg has shown a slight upward trend in form compared to their previous game. On the other hand, Viking has been in mediocre form, especially in away games. Although Viking is stronger on paper, Rosenborg has been in good shape recently and has decent goal - scoring ability at home. Despite Rosenborg's
      AH
      NOR D1 Rosenborg BK - Viking
    More Recommend
    • VPS Vaasa is in good form this season, showing significant advantages in various aspects compared to TPS Turku. In attack, VPS Vaasa has an average offensive conversion rate of 18.3% this season, higher than TPS Turku's 15.7%. Moreover, its xG efficiency value of 1.82 clearly outperforms TPS Turku's 1.45. In terms of key passing success rate, VPS Vaasa's 82% accuracy suppresses TPS Turku's 74%. The value of forward passes, 0.43 for VPS Vaasa and 0.31 for TPS Turku, reflects VPS Vaasa's stronger offensive organization ability. During matches, VPS Vaasa controls the midfield for 58% of the time, and its average number of transition attacks reaches 11.2 times per game, 3.4 more high - speed counter - attack opportunities than TPS Turku. In terms of players' running distance, the total running distance of VPS Vaasa's team is 112 km, and the number of high - intensity sprints is 214 times, both higher than TPS Turku's 106 km and 183 times. I believe that by making careful and well - thought
      O/U
      FIN D1 Vaasa VPS - TPS Turku
    • Both teams are struggling with low offensive efficiency. Warentari's average offensive conversion rate stands at just 9.8%, well below the league - average of 12.3%. Petrolul's expected goals (xG) value of 0.98 is also significantly lower than the 1.35 threshold of the top - five teams in the Romanian league. The passing statistics show a slow - paced game. Warentari's key pass success rate is 72%, and Petrolul's offensive passing value is a meager 0.43 passes per minute. These poor passing performances result in a lack of effective offensive plays. In the midfield battle, Petrolul has an edge in regaining possession, with an average of 13.2 ball recoveries per game, 2.7 more than Warentari. However, their counter - attack threat is weakened by a low counter - attack conversion rate of only 41%. I believe that careful analysis and sincere recommendations are the keys to long - term success. The defensive data sets the tone for this match. FCSB Warența averages 11.3 interceptions per g
      O/U
      ROM D1 FC Voluntari - Petrolul Ploiesti
    • The Eredivisie encounter between Telstar and Sparta Rotterdam shows a notable attacking tendency. In their last five games, both teams have a finishing conversion rate of over 18% (Telstar at 19.3% and Sparta at 18.7%). Their expected goals (xG) efficiency reaches 2.1 goals per game, far exceeding the league average of 1.6 goals. The success rate of key passes (82% for Telstar and 80% for Sparta) and the value of forward passes (Telstar averaging 3.8 high - risk passes per game and Sparta 3.4) indicate strong penetration ability in the middle and front fields. In terms of midfield control, the average ball - possession transition time for both sides is only 4.2 seconds, creating numerous opportunities through rapid attack - defense transitions. The physical data is also remarkable. Telstar runs an average of 118 km per game (ranked third in the league) and has 193 high - intensity sprints. Sparta maintains a rhythm of pressure with 1.4 km of running and 187 sprints per game. I believe
      O/U
      HOL D1 SC Telstar - Sparta Rotterdam
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.