Jeju SK FC vs FC Anyang Tips and Predictions O/U Pi314

K League 1

Analysis More Tips

Jeju SK FC

FC Anyang

Further Reading

Erdem Bitik

Looking at the recent form of the teams, Jeju SK has shown a decent performance in recent matches. In the last 10 games, Jeju SK has 3 wins, 5 draws and 2 losses. On the other hand, FC Anyang has 5 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses in the last 10 games. Their away - game performance is not as good as at home. In historical match - ups, the home team, Jeju SK, holds an advantage. Although the two teams have had a relatively equal record in recent encounters, Jeju SK has demonstrated great tenacity. They are good at engaging in long - drawn - out battles against other opponents. In recent games, Jeju SK has not only played well but also ensured a certain goal - scoring rate. They have withstood various tests, which indicates that their ability to handle pressure is stronger than that of FC Anyang. Moreover, the main players of Jeju SK will be on the field for this game. The question is, can Jeju SK continue to strive for victory in this showdown against FC Anyang? Looking at the recent form, Je

AH
KOR D1 Jeju SK FC 1-0 FC Anyang
Umara Queen

In the K League, the battle between Jeju United and Anyang is a crucial one. Jeju United's home performance this season has been lackluster. With 3 wins, 5 draws, and 4 losses in 12 home games, they've scored only 12 goals and conceded 15, resulting in a negative goal difference of 3. Their 25% win - rate shows that both their offense and defense are weak, with frequent defensive lapses. On the other hand, Anyang has been strong on the road. In 11 away games, they've achieved 5 wins, 4 draws, and 2 losses, scoring 17 goals and conceding 13, a positive goal difference of 4 and a 45.5% win - rate. Their offensive and defensive efficiency away from home is significantly better. In terms of recent form, Jeju United has 3 wins and 3 draws in the last 6 rounds, scoring 11 goals and conceding 7. Their performance is stable, but their offensive efficiency is low. Anyang has 3 wins, 1 draw, and 2 losses in the same period, scoring 9 goals and conceding 9. They have a smooth attack - defense tra

AH
KOR D1 Jeju SK FC 1-0 FC Anyang
Itz Crossbow

Looking at the head - to - head record between Jeju SK and FC Anyang in the K League, Jeju has been at a slight disadvantage recently. In the last six official league encounters, Jeju only managed a 2 - 0 home victory once. The other five games ended without a win, including a 1 - 2 home loss. The corner - kick statistics are a key aspect. Jeju shows a remarkable corner - kick advantage at home. For instance, in the home games, they led 5 - 2 in May, 13 - 7 in November 2025, and had a 12 - 1 lead in the Korea Cup in April 2022. Even in the game where they lost the corner - kick count (3 - 4 in July 2025), they still won. This indicates that Jeju's home - game tactics focus on ball control and flank attacks, which effectively create set - piece opportunities. Moreover, the 0 - 0 score at half - time in July 2025 demonstrates the solidity of their defense. FC Anyang has generally been at a disadvantage in away corner - kick statistics. Their away - game results like 2 - 5, 4 - 5, and 3 -

AH
KOR D1 Jeju SK FC 1-0 FC Anyang

More Recommend

KFUM Oslo has been in a state where their offensive performance shows both quantity and inefficiency. In their recent five matches, they averaged 12.3 offensive terminations per game, yet their conversion rate was only 11%. On the other hand, Lillestrøm has a much better offensive efficiency. Their offensive termination conversion rate of 15% ranks third in the Norwegian Premier League. In terms of key passes, the success rate of KFUM Oslo is 62%, which is significantly lower than Lillestrøm's 71%, and the difference in the value of forward passes is as high as 1.8. In midfield control, Lillestrøm holds a clear lead with a 61% possession rate and a transition speed of 12.4 meters per minute. In terms of physical exertion, the visiting team, Lillestrøm, runs a total of 118 km during the game and makes 23 high - intensity sprints, 4 more than the home team. Defensively, Lillestrøm outperforms KFUM Oslo across the board. They record 18 tackles, 14 interceptions, and 9 clearances. In

AH
NOR D1 KFUM Oslo - Lillestrom
Maryport has shown greater efficiency at the offensive end. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18%, outperforming Seinäjoki's 12%. The xG efficiency is 1.3, 0.5 higher than the opponent. In terms of the passing network, Maryport is more efficient. Their key - passing success rate is 42%, leading Seinäjoki's 30%. The value of forward passes is 1.8 compared to Seinäjoki's 0.9, posing a greater threat. In midfield control, Maryport also has the upper hand. They average 11 tackles and 8 interceptions per game, and their transition speed is 1.2 seconds on average, faster than Seinäjoki. The whole team of Maryport runs a total distance of 112 km and has 45 high - intensity sprints, indicating more abundant physical reserves. Overall, Maryport seems to have more advantages in this game, and their performance is worth looking forward to. Mariehamn shows greater resilience in their defensive system. They average 14 tackles, 10 interceptions, and 7 clearances per game. Their intercept

AH
FIN D1 IFK Mariehamn - SJK Seinajoen
Alavés holds an edge over Getafe in several key offensive metrics. Their attack conversion rate stands at 18.6%, compared to Getafe's 14.3%. The xG efficiency of Alavés is 1.21, while Getafe lags behind at 0.98. In terms of passing in the front - field, Alavés has a higher passing value (4.7) than Getafe's 3.2. The key passing success rate of Alavés is 62%, outperforming Getafe's 51%. In the midfield, Alavés shows more stability. They have a 58% ball - possession rate and a conversion speed of 8.2 times per 90 minutes. Looking at the whole - team performance, Alavés runs more. Their total running distance is 112 km, and the number of high - intensity sprints reaches 89 times, both higher than Getafe's figures. On the defensive end, Alavés is also more active. They have 14 tackles, 21 interceptions, and 18 clearances, while Getafe only manages 12 clearances. Overall, based on these statistics, Alavés seems to be in a better position in this encounter. I invite you to follow me a

AH
SPA D1 Alaves - Getafe

0 Comments

All

By Author

Add Comment

Post

Jeju SK FC VS FC Anyang