Mobile
APP
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    Soccer> Community> Mr Well>

    Alianza Lima VS UTC Cajamarca

    Peru Liga 1
    Analysis More Tips
    Alianza Lima
    Alianza Lima
    UTC Cajamarca
    UTC Cajamarca
    Further Reading
    • ForFun.exe
      ForFun.exe
      Lima Alliance is in red - hot form recently. Their overall offense - defense transition is smooth. They are good at leveraging their home - field advantage to apply high - pressing tactics. By constantly putting pressure on opponents, they disrupt the opponents' ball - playing rhythm and rely on the combination between the midfield and the wings to complete offensive connections. On the other hand, the current form of Caja Marca still needs adjustment. The team has a tough - playing style. When playing away, they mainly adopt a defensive - counterattack strategy. They rely on midfield interceptions to block the opponents' passing lines and then seize opportunities to launch quick long - ball counterattacks. Looking at the historical head - to - head records, Unión de Lima holds a significant advantage. In previous encounters, Unión de Lima won 1 - 0 away and 3 - 0 at home against Caja Marca. Caja Marca has a lack of away - game capabilities. It needs to enhance its resilience when fa
      AH
      PER L1 Alianza Lima - UTC Cajamarca
    More Recommend
    • When comparing the initial odds with the real - time data, the following analysis can be made. Konyaspor shows a clear edge in offensive efficiency. In their last five matches, their offensive conversion rate stands at 18.7%, significantly higher than Rizespor's 12.3%. The expected goals (xG) of Konyaspor reach 1.82, 0.45 more than their opponents, indicating a stronger scoring potential. In terms of passing statistics, Konyaspor's key passing success rate is 62.1%, ranking among the top five in the league. Their forward - field passing value is 8.7 times per 90 minutes, better than Rizespor's 6.2 times. Regarding midfield control, Konyaspor leads the league with an average ball - possession rate of 58.3%. Their transition speed of 1.2 seconds per possession is also the fastest in the league, effectively suppressing their opponents' rhythm. I've got in - depth insights into football matches. Follow me and set up app notifications to receive my regular recommendations and enjoy the surp
      AH
      TUR D1 Konyaspor - Caykur Rizespor
    • When comparing the initial odds with the real - time data, we can see some key differences between Viseu and Santa Clara. Viseu has a relatively poor offensive performance. Their offensive conversion rate is only 12%, which is lower than Santa Clara's 18%. The xG efficiency gap between them is 0.38. In terms of passing, Santa Clara shows better skills. Their key passing success rate is 67%, while Viseu's is only 54%. The value of Santa Clara's forward passes is 2.1 higher than Viseu's. In the midfield battle, Santa Clara has an obvious edge. They have 8 more midfield interceptions than Viseu, and their transition speed is 0.5 seconds faster. Regarding physical performance, Santa Clara runs 3.2 more kilometers in total and has 15% more high - intensity sprints. On the defensive end, Santa Clara's performance is also outstanding. They have 12 tackles, 9 interceptions, and their clearance data is 40% higher than Viseu's. I've been analyzing football matches for a long time, aiming to shar
      AH
      POR D1 Viseu - Santa Clara
    • Comparing the initial odds with the real - time data, here's an analysis. In terms of offensive efficiency, the conversion rate of goal - scoring opportunities for [Team 1] stands at 18.3%, which is better than [Team 2]'s 14.1%. The xG efficiency is 0.78 for [Team 1] compared to 0.55 for [Team 2]. When looking at passing in the attacking third, [Team 1]'s passing value is 12.4, higher than [Team 2]'s 9.2. The success rate of key passes is 62% for [Team 1] and 49% for [Team 2]. In the midfield, [Team 1] has 15 interceptions while [Team 2] only manages 10. The ball - possession rate is 58% for [Team 1] and 42% for [Team 2]. Regarding the overall running distance, [Team 1] runs 112.3 km, more than [Team 2]'s 108.6 km. The number of high - intensity sprints is 42 for [Team 1] and 35 for [Team 2]. [Team 1] also leads in terms of tackles with 18 compared to [Team 2]'s 12, and clearances with 9 against 5. In the attacking end, the on - target shooting rate is 22% for [Team 1] and 16% for [Tea
      AH
      BEL D1 Oud-Heverlee Leuven - Club Brugge
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Goaloo All Rights Reserved.