Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
Ayomide ilesanmiFollow80%Win Rate +42.6%ROI 21Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
2
Queen_SikabaFollow80%Win Rate +36.2%ROI 10Tips 1.80Avg Odds -
3
Light of your world 🔥Won 4/5Follow78.9%Win Rate +42.3%ROI 19Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
4
JAYSON✨Follow78.6%Win Rate +53.6%ROI 14Tips 1.94Avg Odds -
5
TopnotchWon 16/20Follow77.3%Win Rate +16.3%ROI 22Tips 1.54Avg Odds -
6
Abel Alejandro Alcantar TapiaFollow76%Win Rate +41.6%ROI 26Tips 1.93Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Utrecht is set to host their first home game under a new head coach. In the first league game, they lost 1:2 away from home. They had a 48% ball possession rate and 12 shots, with only 3 on target. Their offensive conversion efficiency was mediocre.
In their last five home games, Utrecht has a record of 2 wins and 3 draws, remaining unbeaten. They usually set up a compact formation at home and are good at using the flanks to create space for counter - attacks. In the past six meetings with Alkmaar, Utrecht has achieved 2 wins, 3 draws and 1 loss, which gives them confidence when facing the opponent at home.
However, several key players left during the summer transfer window. As a result, the team's lineup hasn't reached its best - coordinated state yet.
Further Reading
-
MR. OSEI😎Utrecht's home form in the Eredivisie shows some promising aspects. The team's overall performance this season has been mixed, with a win rate of 40%, a draw rate of 10%, and a loss rate of 50%. They've scored 12 goals and conceded 12, resulting in a goal difference of zero, averaging 1.2 goals per game. When playing at home, their form improves. The win rate jumps to 50%, and they average 1.5 goals per game. Defensively, they've conceded 8 goals at home, with a positive goal difference of 1. Their home defense seems relatively stable. The team's corner - kick statistics are also notable. They average 3.6 corners per home game, which is higher than the league average, suggesting potential in their corner - kick offensive tactics. In terms of discipline, Utrecht is well - behaved at home, averaging only 0.8 yellow cards per game. This helps to reduce the risk of losing points due to fouls. However, their overall offensive efficiency still lags behind the league average. Against Alkmaar,AH
HOL D1
FC Utrecht
1-4 AZ Alkmaar
-
ICEKHIDUtrecht has shown a stable performance at home in the Eredivisie. They defeated Heerenveen 3-2 at home, with a 9-6 advantage in corner kicks, demonstrating good offensive power. In another home game, they beat Fortuna Sittard 2-0. Although they were slightly behind in corner kicks (2-5), their attack and defense were well - balanced. However, their away - game performance has been a bit inconsistent. They lost 1-2 to Groningen away, trailing 5-1 in corner kicks, which exposed some defensive weaknesses. But they also managed to beat Ajax 2-1 away, proving their resilience on the road. In a friendly match, they won 3-2 at home against Nagasaki Shimbir, with a 7-2 lead in corner kicks, showing continuous output in the attacking end. This season, Utrecht averages about 6.5 corner kicks per home game and around 5.5 per away game, indicating a high efficiency in attack - defense transitions. On the other hand, Alkmaar has been in strong form recently. They won 2-0 at home against Den Haag, lAHHOL D1
FC Utrecht
1-4 AZ Alkmaar
-
Andie PeciUtrecht has demonstrated a higher offensive finishing conversion rate (18.7% vs 14.2%) and expected goals efficiency (1.23 xG per shot vs 0.98) in recent matches. This indicates that their offense poses a greater threat. Although Alkmaar's key pass success rate reaches 72%, the value of their forward passes is 11.3% lower than that of Utrecht. This shows that the quality of their goal - creating opportunities is insufficient. Utrecht's midfield has a more compact ball - control rhythm. The ball - possession conversion speed reaches 4.2 times per minute, higher than their opponent's 3.4 times. This effectively compresses the reaction time of the opposing defense. Utrecht's total running distance in a game is 118.7 kilometers, and the number of high - intensity sprints is 156, both of which are about 8% higher than Alkmaar's. This reflects their stronger physical fitness and pressing ability. So, how should we interpret the outcome of this game? Utrecht shows remarkable defensive strengtAHHOL D1
FC Utrecht
1-4 AZ Alkmaar
HOL D1
