Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
JAYSON✨Follow78.6%Win Rate +53.6%ROI 14Tips 1.94Avg Odds -
2
Light of your world 🔥Won 4/5Follow76.5%Win Rate +39.3%ROI 17Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
3
Ayomide ilesanmiFollow75%Win Rate +31.5%ROI 16Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
4
bensalemFollow72.7%Win Rate +35.6%ROI 11Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
4
Queen_SikabaFollow72.7%Win Rate +23.8%ROI 11Tips 1.81Avg Odds -
6
Kei R🐉Won 9/11Follow70.6%Win Rate +22.2%ROI 17Tips 1.87Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
The Chicago Fire is in great form, winning multiple games recently. They're highly motivated in the playoff - spot race. At home, their offense is consistent. The midfield has good ball - control and can effectively organize attacks. The wingers' runs create numerous goal - scoring opportunities. However, the defense is troubled by injuries. Some key defenders are unavailable, and the reshuffled backline is less stable. They'll face pressure when dealing with opponents' quick counter - attacks.
The Portland Timbers are on the verge of the Western Conference playoffs, so they're desperate for points. Their attack is fairly potent, mainly relying on wingers' darts and counter - attacks to score. But their away - game performance is inconsistent. There are many defensive flaws on the road, and issues often arise in coordinated defending and covering. Overall, their ability to pick up points away from home is mediocre.
Further Reading
-
The Chelsea VerdictThe Chicago Fire shows a better offensive performance compared to the Portland Timbers. The Fire's offensive conversion rate is 12.3%, superior to the Timbers' 9.8%. The xG efficiency of the Fire reaches 1.82, while the Timbers only achieve 1.21. In terms of the success rate of key forward passes, the Fire leads with 67%, compared to the Timbers' 58%. The value of forward passes for the Fire is 14.2, more threatening than the Timbers' 9.6. Regarding midfield control data, the Fire averages 11.2 tackles and 8.4 interceptions per game, 20% more than the Timbers. The Fire also outperforms in terms of running distance and high - intensity sprints. They cover 112.3 km in a whole game and have 47 high - intensity sprints, higher than the Timbers' 108.1 km and 39 sprints. I can provide you with accurate analysis and recommendations for daily matches. In the defensive data comparison, Chicago Fire has 11.2 tackles per game and 8.4 interceptions, a 20% improvement over Portland Timbers. Their hO/U
MLS
Chicago Fire
2-1 Portland Timbers
-
Liam 665The Chicago Fire and the Portland Timbers both show inefficiency in their offensive ends. The Fire's offensive conversion rate is 12.3%, lower than the league average, while the Timbers' xG efficiency is only 0.62 per 90 minutes. In terms of key passes, neither team has a success rate exceeding 45%. The value of their forward passes is less than 1.8 times per 90 minutes, indicating a lack of creative organization. Regarding midfield control, the Fire have an average ball - possession rate of 58%, but their transition speed is only 1.2 times per minute. In contrast, the Timbers have a faster transition rate of 1.4 times per minute. In terms of running, the Fire cover a distance of 118 km and have 12 high - intensity sprints. However, in defense, their tackle rate is only 22%, interception efficiency is 0.8 times per 90 minutes, and the clearance error rate is as high as 35%. Both teams waste scoring opportunities. Their on - target shooting rate is only 24%, and the total xG is only 1.8AHMLS
Chicago Fire
2-1 Portland Timbers
-
LuksChicago Fire are hoping to win again after their last result, the 2-1 MLS triumph over Charlotte FC. Chicago Fire haven’t had any problems with scoring, netting in each and every one of their last 6 games. They have totted up the amount of 12 during that time while also conceding a total of 9. Still, we’ll just have to find out if such a trend shall be maintained in this next game. Portland Timbers Portland Timbers come into this meeting after a 2-1 MLS win with the eclipse of Seattle Sounders FC in their last outing. Indicating their involvement in action-packed encounters, we’ve had goals 22 times in the previous six matches in which Portland Timbers have taken to the field, yielding a mean average of 3.67 goals for each fixture. Their opponents haveAHMLS
Chicago Fire
2-1 Portland Timbers
MLS
