Mobile
APP
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Member Ranking
-
1
JAYSON✨Follow78.6%Win Rate +53.6%ROI 14Tips 1.94Avg Odds -
2
Light of your world 🔥Won 4/5Follow76.5%Win Rate +39.3%ROI 17Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
3
Ayomide ilesanmiFollow75%Win Rate +31.5%ROI 16Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
4
bensalemFollow72.7%Win Rate +35.6%ROI 11Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
4
Queen_SikabaFollow72.7%Win Rate +23.8%ROI 11Tips 1.81Avg Odds -
6
Kei R🐉Won 9/11Follow70.6%Win Rate +22.2%ROI 17Tips 1.87Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
MetaMaskChicago Fire has shown decent form, winning 7 out of their last 10 matches with 3 losses and no draws. However, it's worth noting that two of their victories were achieved at home, indicating a certain home - field advantage. On the other hand, Portland Timbers has won 5, drawn 2 and lost 3 in their last 10 games. The inconsistent performance of Portland Timbers can be attributed to the players' psychological state and form. In previous encounters, Chicago Fire held an edge. But recently, they've had a few lackluster performances. Their defense has been out of sync, which puts them at a disadvantage. Portland Timbers' forwards have been underwhelming, clearly not performing as well as Chicago Fire. Although Chicago Fire has a better win - loss record in the recent 10 - game span, they don't hold a significant advantage in this upcoming match. As the two teams meet again, it remains to be seen which side can maintain a normal level of play and seize the initiative in this game. The ChicO/U
MLS
Chicago Fire
2-1 Portland Timbers
-
Sup_99The recent form shows that there isn't a significant gap between Chicago Fire and Portland Timbers. Chicago Fire has a record of 7 wins and 3 losses in their last 10 games, while Portland Timbers has 5 wins, 2 draws, and 3 losses. In terms of strength, the two teams are closely - matched. Chicago Fire has put up a decent performance overall, especially in defense. They have played well in their last four games. On the other hand, Portland Timbers' performance is also okay, but slightly inferior to Chicago Fire in recent matches. Their defensive display is also good, yet their performance this season has been inconsistent. Both teams' form has been fluctuating, and their defenses seem vulnerable at times. Comparing their recent conditions, Chicago Fire is in better form than Portland Timbers. However, it won't be easy for either side to gain a clear advantage in this game. It remains to be seen what the outcome of this encounter will be. Chicago Fire has been in good form, winning 7 outAHMLS
Chicago Fire
2-1 Portland Timbers
-
Iqbal ahmadBoth Chicago Fire and Portland Timbers are struggling with inefficiency in their offensive play. Chicago Fire has a conversion rate of 12.3% in offensive finishes, which is below the league average. Meanwhile, Portland Timbers only manages an xG efficiency of 0.62 per 90 minutes. The key pass success rates of both teams fail to reach 45%, and the value of forward passes is less than 1.8 times per 90 minutes, indicating a lack of creative organization. In midfield control, Chicago Fire holds an average ball possession rate of 58%, but their transition speed is only 1.2 times per minute, contrasting sharply with Portland Timbers' rapid transition rate of 1.4 times per minute. Chicago Fire covers a running distance of 118 km and has 12 high - intensity sprints, yet their defensive performance is far from satisfactory. Their tackle success rate is only 22%, interception efficiency is 0.8 times per 90 minutes, and the clearance error rate is as high as 35%. Both teams are wasting scoring opO/UMLS
Chicago Fire
2-1 Portland Timbers
MLS
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post